Saturday, July 21, 2007

MORE PICS & Video (30 s) – NAJIB stating Malaysia - an Islamic Nation spoken as a matter of fact; A Pragmatic truth to him influenced by his beliefs?

Sunday, UPDATE on: Najib Solid as a ROCK?

Sunday July 22, 2007

Najib stays on solid ground; STAR - INSIGHT; By JOCELINE TAN

Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak has been the target of a smear campaign over the Altantuya case but he may have cleared another turning point after the doctored photo episode backfired on its Parti Keadilan Rakyat creator. DATUK Seri Najib Tun Razak arrived for the Rompin Umno division meeting in a helicopter. The aircraft had to make an impromptu landing in a school field because the area where they were supposed to land was filled with tents erected for a jamuan rakyat that day. The meeting was at the modern Uniten campus and as the Deputy Prime Minister said in his speech that morning, Umno and Rompin have come a long way. Najib recalled visiting an Umno branch in Rompin more than 20 years ago. The village road was so bad he had to make his way on foot after the wheels of his car were stuck in the mud. He also recalled an elderly teacher from the area who had no qualms about ringing Tun Razak Hussein to speak his mind, quite unbothered that Razak was not just his MP but also the Prime Minister. More reminders of the early years came in the form of a framed drawing presented by Rompin Umno chief and long-time supporter Datuk Seri Dr Jamaludin Jarjis. It was an ink sketch of a teenage Najib with his parents and brothers, one of whom was still a chubby baby.

Najib has been on the go in the past weeks attending Umno division meetings all over the country and a number of themes have emerged from the speeches he made. First is the general election. The signs point to early polls and he has been urging the Umno grassroots to work towards ensuring a strong mandate for Barisan Nasional. Second is the Malay progress after 50 years of independence and the importance of keeping up with change, to be less reliant on the government, to be bold and to compete. Third, he has used the Umno forum to strike back at the opposition parties, particularly Parti Keadilan Rakyat. Najib has been the target of a PKR smear campaign from the day think-tanker Razak Baginda was arrested over the murder of the Mongolian woman. The PKR attacks reached a peak during the Ijok by-election where he was taunted with chants of “Altantuya! Mongolia!” at every turn. But the Barisan victory in Ijok became a turning point of sorts for Najib because it was the first time he directly rubbished allegations of a connection between him and the Mongolian case.

“Ijok was a real turning point. He went there knowing he would be the target. He had to roll up his sleeves and fight tooth and nail,” said a political insider. Najib has led five by-elections for Barisan since 2004 but Ijok was his toughest because he had to defend himself on a personal level. The latest and perhaps most controversial jab is the by-now infamous picture that originated in the weblog of PKR's unconventional information chief Tian Chua. The digitally composed photograph showed a grim-looking Najib flanked by a smiling Razak and a woman resembling the dead Altantuya Shaariibuu. It was such a poor effort that no one in his right mind would take it seriously. In fact, it has backfired on its creator.
Blogger Syed Azidi Syed Abdul Aziz, better known by his nom de guerre Kickdefella, did a digital match and found that the image of Najib in the doctored photo was actually a picture of Najib taken when he spoke at the World Economic Forum. Chua has admitted it was a digital job, so why the fuss, some had asked. For a start, this is not something that a party that claims a higher moral ground than Umno would resort to. Neither is it an act that a party aspiring to be taken seriously by the electorate would wish to be associated with. Chua's action also got a lot of attention because, as the information chief, he is ranked sixth in the party hierarchy. It would have been fine if he had, from the start, qualified it as a joke or, as claimed, an attempt at satire. But it was only after the furore erupted that he began rationalising the reason for publishing the picture.

DAP politicians have been quietly disapproving of the whole affair. They were victims of similar underhandedness and are still seething over the doctored photograph portraying a few of them with communist leader Chin Peng posted on the Umno Youth website. PAS leaders, on the other hand, were shaking their head in disbelief. They are seasoned politicians and their first reaction was that such clumsy deception would backfire should an actual photograph actually turn up. Besides, PAS politicians know only too well the cruel power of a tampered photograph. They still believe the opposition alliance would have won the 1990 polls were it not for the photograph showing then ally Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah wearing a Kadazan headgear bearing what looked like a crucifix. Politics, unlike football, is not a beautiful game. Those close to Najib have asked him point blank if he has met Altantuya. Najib is very certain he has never met the woman or even knew of her, let alone had a picture taken with her.We have asked him many times, and he is adamant about it. He is confident there is no picture because he has never met or seen the woman. Why is it so hard to believe that Razak is a smart and savvy think-tanker but that he is very private about his private life?” said a close associate of Najib’s.

Top Najib press aide Tengku Shariffuddin Tengku Ahmad said: “He did not even know of her existence. He is very confident there's no such photo in existence. “We did not say anything when the case started because our stand was to let the investigation take its course but the opposition kept playing it up. It came to a point in Ijok when we felt that enough was enough.” Najib made his strongest stand in Ijok when he declared: “As God is my witness, I have never met Altantuya. What I know is what I read in the newspapers.” The botched photo incident may be yet another turning point for Najib. “Najib has been under siege, a victim of innuendos and allegations,” said a Malay media consultant.

A pro-PAS friend of the consultant was so swayed by the conspiracy theories making the rounds that he was prepared to believe Najib was finished. “But after seeing the photograph, my friend thinks there is a political game to frame Najib. Personally, I did not think much of it because the allegations were so extreme. I've always believed his pedigree would determine his conduct,” said the consultant. Najib has told his aides that he would let people judge for themselves how low PKR politicians were prepared to go.

Said Umno Youth deputy chief Khairy Jamaluddin (ABOVE): “The problem among some people is that they just refuse to listen even when it comes from the horse's mouth. I went through the same thing. The best way is to make your case and get on with your work.” The Prime Minister, he added, was also the target of speculative attacks last year but he rode it out. The important thing is that the party accepts Najib's explanations. These are experienced men, they've been through it a lot – Pak Lah last year and Datuk Najib this year. They're handling it with great composure and that's what we want from our leadership,” said Khairy. Those trying to dislodge Najib have to understand that whatever the intensity of the storm blowing outside, he is on solid ground in Umno.

He enjoys the confidence of the Prime Minister and he commands the ground for he has built up support at every stop of his long career. “It is not something he needs to worry about. His network in the party goes back to his days as Umno Youth leader and everywhere he goes, people remember his father's contributions,” said Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Albar. Najib, he said, has never been stronger than now in the party. The PM has complete and absolute trust in him. He is very supportive of his deputy and that is an important plus factor. Don't waste time trying to instigate the PM about Najib, it's not going to work. It would be difficult for anyone to come between them,” said Syed Hamid. Another turning point: Those trying to dislodge Najib have to understand that whatever the intensity of the storm blowing outside, he has solid standing in Umno. Khairy: ‘The important thing is that Umno accepts Najib's explanations’ Syed Hamid: ‘Don't try to instigate the PM about Najib, it's not going to work’
= == = == = =
and from Jelas.info

Supremacist Bigotry: Who Can Defend Us?
Posted on July 22nd, 2007 by nathaniel tan

Much said on the case of Najib, Hisham, Islamic States and high-handed threats. The question on my mind is simple: who can defend us? If a secular state is what we believe in, who will stand up for it? Can MCA, Gerakan or MIC stand up for it? We've seen what happens when they try. Do you think MCA is going to openly defy Hisham? Nobody's stupid enough to believe that.

Let's briefly examine Hisham's calculations in this matter. He must have been perfectly aware that he was creating massive intra-BN tensions and that he was going to cost BN/MCA a few seats at least. Did he care? Not one hoot. Hisham wrongly believes that the BN grip on power is unassailable. But he rightly understands that only Umno is worth anything in this 'coalition.' He's perfectly happy to sacrifice some BN seats if it means strengthening his own intra-Umno position in the run-up to the Umno elections. After all, that's where the only avenue to real power is. What can we do as Hisham and gang conspires to screw us over? It is pivotal to realise that MCA/Gerakan/MIC can't do diddly squat in the face of big brother. I truly appreciate the support of certain BN individuals, but as far as I know, none of their politicians came out to publicly defend me while I was in prison.

Same is going to be for this Islamic state business. And if you don't dare criticise Umno and their arrogant bigotry in public, what good are you? Working 'behind the scenes' so as not to piss off your masters means perpetuating their ill-conceived supreiority complexes. Don't be fooled into thinking that all Malays are so arrogant- that's equally racist and inane. The BN formula has steadily and brutally destroyed race relations in this country, just ask any old timer. It needs to be thoroughly replaced wholesale. If not, these issues will be continued to be played as pawns in internal battles within the Umno hegemony, and it is the whole of Malaysia that will be wrecked. Vote BN out!

= = == == = == = == = ABOVE & BELOW: Delegates attending "International Conference on the Role of Islamic States in a Globalised World" - plenty of empty seats for any latecomers


ABOVE & BELOW: Malaysiakini has the latest reports on the Reaction to Najib’ s Assertion that Malaysia is an Islamic State and the “Shut-up” warning to MCA’s Replies. Details H E R E and H E R E


Watch the Video Clip (34 s) his exact words, on his reply - Malaysia is an Islamic State

= = == = == =

= = == = = ==

It was unfortunate, Datuk Najib Razak , the Deputy Premier “off the cuff” remarks were made are all influenced by his beliefs. From the Video Clip, it can be seen it was an automatic response to the question posed. He is holding strong beliefs to this issue. His reply was motivated by his beliefs and he seemed unaware of the influence of his beliefs; and was not paying attention to what he was saying in relation to the subjects that deemed to be significant or important.

In all these actions, he was NOT incorporating thought to think what he said might be hurtful to others – no tact you might say or insensitive. He was not thinking concerning all of these automatic actions (remarks) — he was doing. He might be thinking but not paying attention to the doing. Of course his beliefs are not absolute truth. His automatic responses that seemed to elude his notice and he identifies them as merely truths. Therefore, they are entirely unquestioned and challenged by others.

The problems and conflicts arise over philosophical differences in interpretation over arguments whether the nation is a secular or Islamic state. Even facts and other information which are more correct and more helpful, he would still cling and hold on to old beliefs, reject or doubt them because his ideas or theory seem contradictory to the new data.

And this is one of the problems we encounter in all our lives and in the world that has produced or given birth to many things, such as hatred, discrimination and conflicts between, between nations, between neighbors and between people.

Truths are mere beliefs, but as you identify them as truths, you do not see them as beliefs. So the problem is when trying to communicate your truth to somebody who is different, it almost … there becomes a question of honesty, rather than truth. You’re not being dishonest if you’re communicating your truth to another individual whose truth is different than yours, but they may perceive it that way. In a cultural setting, the physical location of a country, the mass beliefs expressed in that country which are reinforced by all of the people incorporate certain absolutes, which become their truths as in religious beliefs. What is significant is that we must recognize objectively that theses are NOT actually TRUTHS. They are strongly unquestioned BELIEFS. The belief systems that are strongest to us individually, we would call that a truth. You express it each day within your focuses. You associate with it continuously. Many of your automatic responses are associated within yourselves as truth.

= == == = =
July 17, 2007 12:15 PM
Malaysia Not Secular State, Says Najib


KUALA LUMPUR, July 17 (Bernama) -- Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak said Tuesday Malaysia is not a secular state but an Islamic nation with its own interpretation. He said the country had never been affiliated to secularism but was always driven by the fundamentals of Islam as it is clearly stated in the constitution that Islam is the official religion. "Islam is the official religion and we are an Islamic state. But as an Islamic state, it does not mean that we don't respect the non-Muslims. The Muslims and the non-Muslims have their own rights (in this country)," he told reporters after officiating the "International Conference on the Role of Islamic States in a Globalised World" on behalf of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi at a hotel here.

The conference is organised by the Institute of Islamic Understanding Malaysia (Ikim). Ikim chairman Tan Sri Ahmad Sarji Abdul Hamid and director-general Dr Syed Ali Tawfik Al-Attas (BELOW) were present.

-Najib was asked whether Malaysia was seemingly moving towards being a secular state. "I have to correct you. We have never been secular because being secular by Western definition means separation of the Islamic principles in the way we govern a country. "We have never been affiliated to that position. We have always been driven by our adherence to the fundamentals of Islam. So, your premise is wrong," he said.

Najib said Malaysia does not want to be stereotyped with the Western definitions of a secular and a non-secular state. The two-day conference beginning today aims to discuss specifically the strategic modus operandi of revitalising the Muslim ummah in the global context, particularly through a system of education, to harness quality human capital.

Earlier, Najib launched a book entitled "The Ijazah of Abdullah Fahim" authored by Mesut Idris and Syed Ali and published by MPH Group Publishing. It is available at major bookstores at RM59.90 per copy.
== = == = = = =
2007/07/19

MCA: We are a secular nation

By : Eileen Ng, NST
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia is a secular state, insists the MCA. It said the position was clear as evidenced by numerous historical documents, including the Reid Report, the Cobbold Commission and a 1988 Supreme Court decision. After reviewing the documents used in the process of drafting the Federal Constitution, the party’s secretary-general, Datuk Ong Ka Chuan (picture), said Malaysia was a secular state based on the consensus and social contract agreed upon by the nation’s forefathers.

"The documents showed that a secular state is the foundation of the formation of Malaya and this consensus was made by our forefathers," he said yesterday. He said this in response to the statement by Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak on Monday(Tuesday) that Malaysia is an Islamic nation that protects the rights of non-Muslims. Citing an example, Ong said according to the Alliance’s memorandum to the Reid Commission dated Sept 27, 1956, it was stated on Page 19 that "The religion of Malaya shall be Islam. The observance of this principle shall not impose any disability on non-Muslim nationals professing and practising their own religion, and shall not imply the state is not a secular state."

Ong said former prime minister Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra Al-Haj had said during a meeting on April 17, 1957, that "the whole constitution was framed on the basis that the federation would be a secular state". Ong said notes prepared by the Colonial Office dated May 23, 1957, at the London Conference Talks mentioned that "the members of the Alliance delegation stressed that they had no intention of creating a Muslim theocracy and that Malaya would be a secular state".

Additionally, Ong stated that when former MCA president, who was Finance Minister, Tun Tan Siew Sin spoke in parliament on July 10, 1957, in support of the Constitutional Bill, he said that although Islam would be the official religion, "this does not in any way derogate from the principle, which has always been accepted, that Malaya will be a secular state and that there will be a complete freedom to practise any other religion".

Ong added that all these documents showed a true picture of Malaysia, which is a secular nation. MCA central committee member and Kota Melaka MP Wong Nai Chee said Najib’s interpretation was "not in accordance with the spirit and intent of the Federal Constitution".

He said that the issue of Malaya as a secular state was vigorously debated again during the 1962 Cobbold Commission before the entry of Sabah and Sarawak, forming Malaysia. "Again, the secular nature of Malaysia was reiterated as having been stated in the Reid Commission. The secular nature of our Federal Constitution has been the basis for our nation building since 1957 and reinforced in 1963." The Malaysian Consultative Council of Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Sikhism and Taoism president, Datuk A. Vaithilingam, urged the government and all Malaysians to respect the social contract agreed to in 1957.

The council also strongly objected to attempts by the government to change the status quo. The Bar Council said that in the context of the country’s history and the constitution itself that proclaimed its supremacy, there was no doubt whatsoever that Malaysia was a secular state.

[…]
= = == = == == = == = the Facts from the BAR Council

PRESS STATEMENT -Malaysia a secular State

The statement made by the Deputy Prime Minister in this 50th year of Merdeka that Malaysia has never been a secular state is startling as it ignores the undisputed constitutional history of the country as well as the social contract by which the multi racial and multi-religious people of this nation came together. The Federal Constitution was a carefully thought out, carefully negotiated document that evolved after much debate and discussion. Some historical context is necessary. In 1956, Tunku Abdul Rahman had headed a Merdeka Mission to London to negotiate for independence. The
negotiations were conducted by 4 representatives of the Malay Rulers, 4 representatives of the then Alliance Government and representatives of the British Government. The Reid Commission was then appointed to draft a constitution for independent Malaya. The Reid Commission held 118 meetings in Malaya. It met a wide cross-section of people and
organisations and received 131 memoranda. One of the striking features of the Reid Commission report and the Federal Constitution is the inter-communal compromises. These compromises were essentially the result of proposals set out in a memorandum by the then Alliance party which had in turn been vigorously debated over many months by a core group from UMNO, MCA, and MIC under Tunku's chairmanship. The Alliance Memorandum referred to the issue of religion as follows:
"The religion of Malaya shall be Islam. The observance of this principle shall not impose any disability on non-Muslim nationals professing and practising their own religion, and shall not imply that the State is not a secular State

." (Emphasis added)
Subsequent to the issuance of the Reid Report, further reviews were carried out by a Working Party that again consisted of representatives from the Malay rulers, the Alliance party and the British Government. The Alliance party set up its own sub-committee chaired by its then deputy president, Datuk Abdul Razak. Again the Alliance maintained its position that they had no intention of creating a Muslim theocracy and that Malaya would be a secular State. A white paper subsequently issued by the British Government in June 1957 confirmed this by stating "This will in no way affect the present position of the Federation as a secular State". Since then Tunku himself, respected Academics, and our own Supreme Court in 1988 have reiterated in one way or another that we are asecular State and not an Islamic State. Thus for more than 40 years (until 2001), no-one had suggested that Malaysia is an Islamic State. One has to only look at the Articles in the Federal Constitution, our system of government and the administration of justice to know that we are not an Islamic State. The Civil Courts set up under the Constitution dispense secular justice on a daily basis to all the citizens of this country. Secular law governs contracts, commerce, international relations and trade and every aspect of the lives of a citizen. Islamic law governs specific matters set out in the Federal Constitution in relation to persons professing Islam.
In the context of our history and the Constitution itself that proclaims its supremacy, it is the Bar Council's view that there is no doubt whatsoever that Malaysia is a secular state and not an Islamic state. It is noteworthy that the Prime Minister in his speech delivered at the conference yesterday and in his propagating Islam Hadhari has never referred to Malaysia as an Islamic State. It is time that the proposition that Malaysia is not secular, (which is a rewriting of the Constitution), be put to rest once and for all and that there is due recognition and reaffirmation of the clear legal and constitutional position that Malaysia is, and has always been, a secular State.
Ambiga Sreenevasan’ President’ Malaysian Bar,18 July 2007

= = == =
18th July 2007,: Najib, Malaysia is not an Islamic state; DAP; Ronnie Liu Tian Khiew

Dear Malaysians, please do not take Najib Razak seriously. I personally believe that he does not understand or differentiate between an Islamic state, an Islamic nation and an Islamic country. Having Islam as the official religion does not make Malaysia an Islamic state. A government driven by Islamic fundamentals also would not make it an Islamic state. What more in Malaysia, we were not driven by Islamic fundamentals as claimed by the deputy prime minister. How could he call Malaysia an Islamic state when we still have licensed casino like the Genting, lotteries like Magnum, Toto, 3+1D and Bigsweeps?

And how about draconian laws that clearly go against the tenets of Islam like ISA (detention without trial) and OSA? Does Najib know that in an Islamic state, you cannot have Sultan or King as the supreme leader of the land has to be an ulamak ( religious guru)? I once pointed out to the former prime minister Dr Mahathir at a forum in Shah Alam one year after he unilaterally declared Malaysia as an Islamic State, that he may be the most powerful man in this country but he has no rights to declare Malaysia as an Islamic state.

I also pointed out to him that since he did not seek the approval from the Cabinet and the Parliament, I would regard his proclamation as null and void and purely his personal opinion. Besides, I also argued that both the Reid and Cobalt Commissions did not specify Malaysia as an Islamic state. And that besides DAP, the Consultative Council of Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism and Sikkhism had openly objected to the unilateral proclaimation of Dr Mahathir. Dr Mahathir was taken aback by my arguments. He was unable to give a satisfactory answer and being a seasoned politician; he quickly cut short the dialogue and adjourned for tea! (I was the second speaker from the floor) And I once again wish to tell Najib that Islam is our official religion (mainly ceremonial) but Malaysia is certainly not an Islamic state.We can accept that Malaysia is an Islamic nation or Islamic country, just like Indonesia and Brunei.

I would even go one step further to state that it’s totally acceptable to adopt certain Islamic values which are universal in nature into our system of governance. We have nothing to worry if the government of the day truly follows the tenets and values of religion.

= = == = =
July 17, 2007 12:47 PM

Abdullah Urges Muslims To Reclaim Their Lost Golden Legacy

ABOVE: Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak delivering the address on behalf of PM Ahmad Badawi

KUALA LUMPUR, July 17 (Bernama) -- Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi Tuesday outlined four imperatives, including renewing the spirit of unity among Muslims, for Islamic states to seek a wider and more active role in a globalising world and reclaim the golden legacy of the Islamic era. The prime minister said Muslims must also start to revive their economic position, invest in education and skills and establish social justices, based on timeless Islamic principles. He said that for more than a thousand years, Muslim civilisation was the zenith of human achievement with the Muslims as the leading philosophers, scientists, and innovators of their era and as such, they needed to reclaim this golden legacy that had been lost to the ages. Abdullah said Muslims often forgot that through the spread of the empire, they gave birth to a Muslim wave of globalisation more than a thousand years ago, where Muslim states were shining examples of economic progress, scientific innovation and social justice. "We cannot remain mere spectators in a world that is rapidly moving ahead. We must commit ourselves to enhancing our competitiveness in order to play a contributing role to the advancement of human civilisation, as was the legacy of Islamic states in the past" he said.

He said this in his address at the Institute of Islamic Understanding Malaysia's (IKIM) international conference on "The Role of Islamic States in a Globalised World" here. His speech was delivered Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak. Touching on the need to renew the spirit of unity among Muslims, Abdullah said Islam is a global faith that binds many races together, but today Muslims find themselves pitted against each other, such as Sunnis against Shias and most tragically Palestinians against Palestinians. In this context, he stressed that Muslims must also renew their understanding of Islam and put aside any sectarian differences which could lead to division and conflict among them.

"Ultimately, we must begin to move beyond politics and conflict, and focus on the issues that truly concern us as an ummah -- tackling poverty, eliminating illiteracy, combating ignorance and raising the quality of life. This is the immediate concern for us all, as Muslims," he said. On another key imperative, Abdullah said Muslim nations must begin to revive their economic position because Muslims' share of the global economy was poor and even the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC) member countries had collectively recorded a declining share of trade within developing countries. In 2005, the OIC's collective Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was less than five per cent of the total world figure, and intra-trade volume -- at about US$800 billion -- was only about six to seven per cent of total global trade.

Abdullah said that when Malaysia took over the chairmanship of OIC, one of the objectives Malaysia set out to achieve during its tenure was to expand and deepen the economic linkages between Muslim countries of "what I call putting an economic face to the OIC". "I believe that we are already on our way towards promoting the revival of the global Muslim economy. In 2005, the World Islamic Economic Forum was launched under the aegis of the OIC. We have endeavoured to promote economic links and entrepreneurs within the Muslim ummah, particularly among women entrepreneurs as well as young leaders," he said. Abdullah, who is the current chairman of the OIC, said he had spearheaded a capacity-building programme within the OIC to build capabilities in commercially-driven and income-generating projects, particularly in the lower-income countries, adding that these initiatives were among the many efforts the OIC would continue to undertake to further promote trade and economic cooperation among the Muslims.

Abdullah also said that there was a need for Muslim countries to invest in education and skills because the rise of every nation was preceded by the acquisition of knowledge. He said Muslims need to build a knowledgeable society -- an "Ulul Al Bab" community -- in which real and true knowledge is the governing principle of all human activity. "We must be willing to invest towards educating the next generation of great scholars -- the ulama that will light our way -- in every spectrum of the sciences. Of the great scholars that we already have today, we must honour them and their contributions. We must build a generation of Muslims that recognises and honours knowledge. This is the way of success," he said.

Speaking on the need to establish social justice, based on timeless Islamic principles, Abdullah said Muslim countries must liberate good, human capabilities so that every Muslim and individual citizen could positively participate in our system of governance.

"We must remember that the governed possess the right to be governed as free men, as human beings governed by consent. This is true, not only through the prism of western frameworks of human rights, (but) it is also true from the tawhidic concept of justice," he said. Abdullah pointed out that the four imperatives must be undertaken within a cohesive framework of Islam, which promotes a proper appreciation of Islam as a force for progress and development, adding that this approach may be found in the principles of Islam Hadhari, which he introduced in Malaysia and promoted globally. Abdullah pointed out that while globalisation has led to many positive outcomes such as rapid advancement in trade, communications and transportation, it has also contributed to a host of global ills such as loss of jobs and unfair terms of trade. He said that as such while the global challenges confronting the world's 1.6 billion Muslims were tremendous, playing the role of a global player was not something completely new to Muslims as they have played that very role centuries ago.

The prime minister said that unfortunately the reality today was that Muslim countries were woefully unprepared to face the challenges of globalisation where many of them were still grappling with basic developmental issues at a time when many other nations were finding ways to become more competitive. "It is quite clear that some Muslim countries today are in a state of confusion and even desperation. In fact, for some Muslims, they have even begun to see globalisation as a conspiracy to undermine Islam. This leads many of them to espouse radical views and even commit extremist acts and for many other Muslims, they remain resigned to their sorry fate, deprived and dejected. "Nevertheless, we need to realise that the phenomenon of globalisation is here to stay. Simply opposing globalisation -- adopting the attitude of withdrawal or taking the path of obscurantism -- is clearly not a wise option. In fact it is not an option at all," Abdullah said.

Friday, July 20, 2007

MORE PICS & Video – Day 22 Altantuya Murder Trial; Azilah led Police (Defense objected Evidence) to Crime Scene; Sirul led Cops Recover Her Valuables

ABOVE & BELOW: Malaysiakini two news reports on the same day as Trial. Get a subscription to read it HERE and H E R E

ABOVE: An artist impression of Court on Day 22 Trial

Sirul led cops to recovery of Altantuya’s valuables
R.Surenthira Kumar and Maria J.Dass, from SUN
Day 22
SHAH ALAM (July 19, 2007): A police officer told the court today Cpl Sirul Azhar Umar had led a police team to his apartment in Kota Damasara where a pair of earrings, a ring and a watch believed to have belonged to Altantuya Shaariibuu were recovered from a jacket in his wardrobe.


C/Insp Koh Fei Cheow (ABOVE) from the Kuala Lumpur police contingent headquarters (IPK KL) serious crimes division told the court Sirul, the second accused in the Altantuya murder trial, had led a team from his division to his apartment in Jalan Chmar, Gugusan Semarak, Section 4, Kota Damasara, where the team recovered a pair of earrings, a ring and a watch from a jacket in his wardrobe.

ABOVE & BELOW: Looking Left or Right?
Koh said the day before that, first accused Azilah Hadri, 31, had led them to the crime scene in Puncak Niaga Empangan Tasik Subang where he identified the place where Altantuya’s body was blown up. "We stopped in a jungle clearing and after looking around, Azilah led me into the jungle and told me: "This is the place where the Mongolian woman was blown up." "I then checked the area and found bone fragments believed to be that of human," said Koh. However he said it was not a full skeleton. "After this, he took me to a clearing about 30 feet away from the place where the body was blown up and told me this was where the (Mongolian) woman was shot," said Koh. He also told the court that the surrounding jungle foliage was withered. Koh said Azilah had told him that he would take him to the crime scene during an interview on the evening of Nov 6.

Following this Koh and his officers took Azilah in a police four-wheel drive and he led them to the crime scene. "He did not know the name of the place and was unsure of the location," he said. The team had gotten lost several times before they arrived at the scene at 6.50pm, he said. Koh said that although it was getting dark, he could still see and that later on, the headlights of the police vehicles were used to improve visibility. He said five minutes after Azilah had shown him around the crime scene, he saw a vehicle approching.
"It was ASP Tonny Lunggan and his team who were led to the place by Sirul," said Koh. "I then took Azilah back to the place where my vehicle was parked and watched while ASP Tonny and his team conducted their investigations," he said.

"It was only after ASP Tonny had completed his investigations that both the accused were allowed to meet," said Koh. He said the forensics team arrived later. "After this I secured the place and handed it over to ASP Tonny Lunggan," said Koh, adding he was at the scene until 8.45pm after which the forensics team could not continue their investigations as it was dark.
Azilah was brought back to IPK KL and was placed in the lock-up, he said.
"The next day ASP Zulkarnain and I interviewed Sirul at about
2pm," said Koh adding that Zulkarnain had read out a caution statement to Sirul first. He said during the questioning Sirul had provided some information on some jewellery belonging to the Mongolian woman (Altantuya). Koh said Sirul then led him, C/Insp Syawal and some D9 personnel to his flat on the fifth floor in Gugusan Semarak, Kota Damasara. "A UTK (Special Action Unit) personnel Sgt Rosli handed me the keys to Sirul’s apartment," said Koh who however could not confirm the set of keys produced in court was the same one which Rosli handed him. ASP Zulkarnain then entered the premises.

ABOVE: Sirul's Apartment entrance in Kota Damansara

ABOVE: The black jacket found at Sirul's Apartment and BELOW: Altantuya's valuables

"When in his bedroom, Sirul opened a wardrobe and showed us a black jacket," said Koh adding that ASP Zulkarnain then took out the jacket and placed it on the bed. "I also saw him remove a pair of earrings and a watch from pocket inside the jacket," he said. Koh said they continued to search the room and the rest of the house but did not find anything else. Koh identified the ring, the earring and the watch as the items seized from Sirul’s house.

= == = = == = == =


ABOVE & BELOW: Sirul looking left or right?

During examination in chief DPP Tun Majid Tun Hamzah asked Koh if Azilah was handcuffed when he was brought out of the lock-up and Koh said yes. Asked if Azilah was beaten up, spoken to in a harsh manner, if he was beaten, tortured, threatened and if any promised were made to him, Koh disagreed. Koh said he was assisted by two other personnel, C/Insp Kamarulzaman and C/Insp Jafri as they were more familiar with the case background, than he was as he (Koh) had just returned from his leave.
Hearing continues on Monday, when submissions will be heard to decide on when a trial-within-a-trial should be held at the re-examination level or before cross-examination of the the witness (Koh).The trial-within-a-trial is to decide on the admisability of the statement pertaining the accused leading the police to the scene of crime.
The court will decide whether to exclude it if it was made involuntarily.
= = == = == == == = = == = = =

Defence objects to claims Azilah led cops to murder scene

ABOVE: The dirt road leading to the crime scene BELOW
= = == = = = == = == = == = == = = == = ==
ABOVE & BELOW: Closer views of the explosive blasing scenes

SHAH ALAM (July 19, 2007): A defence lawyer today objected to a witness’ testimony that Chief Insp Azilah Hadri had led the police to the site where Altantuya Shariibuu was allegedly murdered. Azilah’s lawyer, Hazman Ahmad, raised the objection during the examination-in-chief of Chief Insp Koh Fei Cheow by Deputy Public Prosecutor Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah.


Hazman called for a trial-within-a-trial to be held to determine if the testimony can be admitted as evidence.

Hazman: Objection. This statement comes under Section 27 (Evidence Act). Based on the Francis Anthonysamy case, the most appropriate way is for the court to exclude the evidence and it has to be done through a trial-within-a-trial.
Hazman’s co-counsel, J. Kuldeep Kumar, told judge Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yasin it was "an unfair statement".

Kuldeep: According to the Francis case, page 406 para 32, in the circumstances, it amounts to unfairness, and we ask for a trial-within-a-trial to be conducted.
Mohd Zaki: You read again this case during the lunch break and then you may re-submit.
Before that, Koh testified he was instructed to arrest Cpl Sirul Azhar Umar by
Kuala Lumpur police contingent headquarters (IPK KL) serious crime division (D9) head Supt Zainol Samah at 3.40pm on Nov 6, 2006. He said Sirul Azhar was at the D9 information counter, and after introducing himself, he told Sirul Azhar he was under arrest and the reason for it, before asking him to hand over his belt, his handphone and his wallet. After making the arrest, Koh said, he lodged a report on the arrest of the Special Action Unit (UTK) personnel at IPK KL at 4.01pm and later handed over Sirul Azhar to a team from the D6 (Interrogation Division) based aint the federal police headquarters in Bukit Aman.


Koh said Sirul Azhar was then handed over to investigating officer ASP Tony Lunggan before he was sent back to the lock-up. He said at about 5.20pm, he was instructed by Lunggan to fetch Azilah from the lock-up as they wanted to look for the location where Altantuya was allegedly murdered.
Tun Abdul Majid: After fetching the first accused, did he provide any information or reveal anything?
Koh: Yes.
Tun Abdul Majid: Did you take any action based on the information?
Koh: Yes.

Tun Abdul Majid: What did you do?
Koh: I took the first accused and together with my team began to search for the incident site, based on what he disclosed.
Tun Abdul Majid: Can you state the steps taken by you, from the beginning to the end.

Koh: After getting the information at 5.26pm, I and my team and the first accused started our mission to search for the place. We left IPK KL in a Pajero (4WD) and headed to the area.
Tun Abdul Majid: At IPK KL, before leaving, who else was there?
Koh: Before leaving, I saw Supt Zainol Samah and informed him about our mission.
Earlier, Zainol continued with his testimony and Hazman continued with his cross-examination.
Asked who had instructed Azilah to go to the Brickfields police station, Zainol said he did not know. Hazman asked several other questions about Azilah’s arrest and the other subsequent arrests in relation to the case.

Zainol (ABOVE)either answered that he did not know or "unsure" and this agitated Hazman and the other defence lawyers who took turns to cross examine.
He also said there were five vehicles involved in the search for the murder site and they consisted, Koh’s team, the police vehicle carrying him, ASP Tony’s team, the IPK KL and Bukit Aman forensics team and DSP Gan’s team.
During re-examination Tun Abdul Majid, who was also perplexed with Zainol’s inability to recall his memory, asked him to explain why he had answered earlier that he did not know who had instructed Azilah to go to the Brickfields police station when Lunggan had told him that he will be taken to IPK KL after Azilah turned up at Brickfields.

Zainol said he did not understand the question properly.
Lawyer Wong Kian Kheong also grilled Zainol, who answered in the same manner, "can’t remember or don’t know" when asked if any investigations were undertaken following the submission of an affidavit by his client, Abdul Razak Abdullah Baginda.
= = == = = = =

ABOVE: The boxes of evidence on Day 22 Trial

July 19, 2007 22:33 PM
Azilah Not Abused, Beaten Or Encouraged During 'Interview'

SHAH ALAM, July 19 (Bernama) -- Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri was not beaten, abused, threatened, encouraged or promised something in an "interview" during which he allegedly disclosed the location where Altantuya Shaariibbu was shot and blown up.Chief Inspector Koh Fei Cheow, 38, from the Kuala Lumpur police headquarters' major crime investigation division told this to the High Court here Thursday.He said Azilah was physically healthy and in "normal condition" when he and his two staff interviewed the first accused in the murder of the Mongolian woman at his office on Nov 6 last year.
When examined by Deputy Public Prosecutor Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah, Koh said Azilah did not make any complaint to him or his two staff on the treatment received during the interview.
He said although Azilah and him were of the same rank, he was more senior than Azilah and during the interview, Azilah was handcuffed.

Tun Majid: "Did you hit him?"
Koh: "No."
Tun Majid: "Used rough language?"
Koh: "No".
Tun Majid: "Abused him?"
Koh: "No"
Koh said his two staff also did not encourage, give promise or threaten Azilah "because they were under my command" and they were present during the interview as "escorts and to assist him on the facts of the murder case because he had just returned from leave".
Asked whether the two staff knew about the facts of the case, he said: "More or less."

Tun Majid: "Did they suggest anything to the first accused about the case?"
Koh: "No."Tun Majid: "What do you mean by 'assisting'? What are their roles?"
Koh: "They conducted the interview on the location of the incident. I have no knowledge when, where or how it happened. That was why I asked the two staff to assist me on this matter."Koh said they did question Azilah but he did not remember the questions posed by them to Azilah
= = == = == = =

What happened yesterday (Day 22)
>
Kuala Lumpur police contingent headquarters special investigations unit head Supt Zainol Samah was cross-examined by the defence and re-examined by the prosecution;
> The next prosecution witness was Chief Insp Koh Fei Cheow of the Serious Crimes Investigation Division of IPK KL. He was the one who arrested both murder accused, and later went to the alleged crime scene; and
> The hearing resumes on Monday (July 23).

ABOVE & BELOW: Abdul Razak arriving on Day 22 Trial

BELOW: The hooded one could be either Azilah or Sirul

= == = == == = = =from Bernama

July 19, 2007 18:13 PM
Azilah Points To Spot With Human Bones

SHAH ALAM, July 19 (Bernama) -- An investigating officer from the Kuala Lumpur police headquarters Major Crime Division said he found what were believed to be human bones and bone fragments at an area pointed to him by Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri. Chief Inspector Koh Fei Cheow said the bones could be clearly seen among some undergrowth on a hill known as Puncak Niaga Empangan Tasik, Subang, Selangor.In his testimony in the High Court here Thursday, he said the discovery was made at 6.20pm on Nov 6 last year.

Koh said Azilah, also told him that the spot where the bones were found was also where a Mongolian woman (Altantuya's name was not mentioned) was blown up.

Azilah, the first accused in the Altantuya Shaariibuuu murder trial, also brought Koh to an open space about 30 feet (nine metres) away from the first spot, and he (Azilah) told him that this was where the Mongolian woman was shot earlier.He said policemen who brought Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar along arrived at the place five minutes later.
Azilah, 31, and Sirul Azhar, 36, both from Bukit Aman Police Action Squad, are charged with murdering interpreter and part-time model Altantuya, 28, at a location between Lot 12843 and Lot 16735, Mukim Bukit Raja, here between 10pm on Oct 19 and 1am on Oct 20, 2006.
Political analyst Abdul Razak Abdullah Baginda, 47, is charged with abetting the two policemen in the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur between
9.54am on Oct 18 and 9.45pm on Oct 19, 2006.

= = == = =Watch the 1 min 46 s Video Clip - Day 22 Trial





= = == = == = = = == =

Thursday, July 19, 2007

MORE PICS & Video – Day 21 Trial –Altantuya Murder Trial; Court Visited the Crime Scene on a Rainy Day; Her Ghost was there from the Blasted Energy

UPDATE: Day 22 Trial; Jul 198 2007,

This update is also available in next post H E R E on Day 22 Trial
ABOVE: An artist impression of Court on Day 22 Trial

Sirul led cops to recovery of Altantuya’s valuables

R.Surenthira Kumar and Maria J.Dass, from SUN

Day 22
SHAH ALAM (July 19, 2007): A police officer told the court today Cpl Sirul Azhar Umar had led a police team to his apartment in Kota Damasara where a pair of earrings, a ring and a watch believed to have belonged to Altantuya Shaariibuu were recovered from a jacket in his wardrobe.


C/Insp Koh Fei Cheow (ABOVE) from the Kuala Lumpur police contingent headquarters (IPK KL) serious crimes division told the court Sirul, the second accused in the Altantuya murder trial, had led a team from his division to his apartment in Jalan Chmar, Gugusan Semarak, Section 4, Kota Damasara, where the team recovered a pair of earrings, a ring and a watch from a jacket in his wardrobe.
Koh said the day before that, first accused Azilah Hadri, 31, had led them to the crime scene in Puncak Niaga Empangan Tasik Subang where he identified the place where Altantuya’s body was blown up. "We stopped in a jungle clearing and after looking around, Azilah led me into the jungle and told me: "This is the place where the Mongolian woman was blown up." "I then checked the area and found bone fragments believed to be that of human," said Koh. However he said it was not a full skeleton. "After this, he took me to a clearing about 30 feet away from the place where the body was blown up and told me this was where the (Mongolian) woman was shot," said Koh. He also told the court that the surrounding jungle foliage was withered. Koh said Azilah had told him that he would take him to the crime scene during an interview on the evening of Nov 6.

Following this Koh and his officers took Azilah in a police four-wheel drive and he led them to the crime scene. "He did not know the name of the place and was unsure of the location," he said. The team had gotten lost several times before they arrived at the scene at 6.50pm, he said. Koh said that although it was getting dark, he could still see and that later on, the headlights of the police vehicles were used to improve visibility. He said five minutes after Azilah had shown him around the crime scene, he saw a vehicle approching.
"It was ASP Tonny Lunggan and his team who were led to the place by Sirul," said Koh. "I then took Azilah back to the place where my vehicle was parked and watched while ASP Tonny and his team conducted their investigations," he said.

"It was only after ASP Tonny had completed his investigations that both the accused were allowed to meet," said Koh. He said the forensics team arrived later. "After this I secured the place and handed it over to ASP Tonny Lunggan," said Koh, adding he was at the scene until 8.45pm after which the forensics team could not continue their investigations as it was dark.
Azilah was brought back to IPK KL and was placed in the lock-up, he said.
"The next day ASP Zulkarnain and I interviewed Sirul at about
2pm," said Koh adding that Zulkarnain had read out a caution statement to Sirul first. He said during the questioning Sirul had provided some information on some jewellery belonging to the Mongolian woman (Altantuya). Koh said Sirul then led him, C/Insp Syawal and some D9 personnel to his flat on the fifth floor in Gugusan Semarak, Kota Damasara. "A UTK (Special Action Unit) personnel Sgt Rosli handed me the keys to Sirul’s apartment," said Koh who however could not confirm the set of keys produced in court was the same one which Rosli handed him. ASP Zulkarnain then entered the premises.

ABOVE: Sirul's Apartment entrance in Kota Damansara

ABOVE: The black jacket found at Sirul's Apartment and BELOW: Altantuya's valuables - a watch, a pair of earrings and a broken ring from a broken relationship.

"When in his bedroom, Sirul opened a wardrobe and showed us a black jacket," said Koh adding that ASP Zulkarnain then took out the jacket and placed it on the bed. "I also saw him remove a pair of earrings and a watch from pocket inside the jacket," he said. Koh said they continued to search the room and the rest of the house but did not find anything else. Koh identified the ring, the earring and the watch as the items seized from Sirul’s house.

During examination in chief DPP Tun Majid Tun Hamzah asked Koh if Azilah was handcuffed when he was brought out of the lock-up and Koh said yes. Asked if Azilah was beaten up, spoken to in a harsh manner, if he was beaten, tortured, threatened and if any promised were made to him, Koh disagreed. Koh said he was assisted by two other personnel, C/Insp Kamarulzaman and C/Insp Jafri as they were more familiar with the case background, than he was as he (Koh) had just returned from his leave.
Hearing continues on Monday, when submissions will be heard to decide on when a trial-within-a-trial should be held at the re-examination level or before cross-examination of the the witness (Koh).The trial-within-a-trial is to decide on the admisability of the statement pertaining the accused leading the police to the scene of crime.
The court will decide whether to exclude it if it was made involuntarily.
= = == = == == == = = == = = =

Defence objects to claims Azilah led cops to murder scene

ABOVE: The dirt road leading to the crime scene BELOW
= = == = = = == = == = == = == = = == = ==
ABOVE & BELOW: Closer views of the explosive blasting scenes

SHAH ALAM (July 19, 2007): A defence lawyer today objected to a witness’ testimony that Chief Insp Azilah Hadri had led the police to the site where Altantuya Shariibuu was allegedly murdered. Azilah’s lawyer, Hazman Ahmad, raised the objection during the examination-in-chief of Chief Insp Koh Fei Cheow by Deputy Public Prosecutor Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah.


Hazman called for a trial-within-a-trial to be held to determine if the testimony can be admitted as evidence.
Hazman: Objection. This statement comes under Section 27 (Evidence Act). Based on the Francis Anthonysamy case, the most appropriate way is for the court to exclude the evidence and it has to be done through a trial-within-a-trial.
Hazman’s co-counsel, J. Kuldeep Kumar, told judge Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yasin it was "an unfair statement".

Kuldeep: According to the Francis case, page 406 para 32, in the circumstances, it amounts to unfairness, and we ask for a trial-within-a-trial to be conducted.
Mohd Zaki: You read again this case during the lunch break and then you may re-submit.
Before that, Koh testified he was instructed to arrest Cpl Sirul Azhar Umar by
Kuala Lumpur police contingent headquarters (IPK KL) serious crime division (D9) head Supt Zainol Samah at 3.40pm on Nov 6, 2006. He said Sirul Azhar was at the D9 information counter, and after introducing himself, he told Sirul Azhar he was under arrest and the reason for it, before asking him to hand over his belt, his handphone and his wallet. After making the arrest, Koh said, he lodged a report on the arrest of the Special Action Unit (UTK) personnel at IPK KL at 4.01pm and later handed over Sirul Azhar to a team from the D6 (Interrogation Division) based aint the federal police headquarters in Bukit Aman.


Koh said Sirul Azhar was then handed over to investigating officer ASP Tony Lunggan before he was sent back to the lock-up. He said at about 5.20pm, he was instructed by Lunggan to fetch Azilah from the lock-up as they wanted to look for the location where Altantuya was allegedly murdered.
Tun Abdul Majid: After fetching the first accused, did he provide any information or reveal anything?
Koh: Yes.
Tun Abdul Majid: Did you take any action based on the information?
Koh: Yes.
Tun Abdul Majid: What did you do?
Koh: I took the first accused and together with my team began to search for the incident site, based on what he disclosed.
Tun Abdul Majid: Can you state the steps taken by you, from the beginning to the end.

Koh: After getting the information at 5.26pm, I and my team and the first accused started our mission to search for the place. We left IPK KL in a Pajero (4WD) and headed to the area.
Tun Abdul Majid: At IPK KL, before leaving, who else was there?
Koh: Before leaving, I saw Supt Zainol Samah and informed him about our mission.
Earlier, Zainol continued with his testimony and Hazman continued with his cross-examination.
Asked who had instructed Azilah to go to the Brickfields police station, Zainol said he did not know. Hazman asked several other questions about Azilah’s arrest and the other subsequent arrests in relation to the case.

Zainol (ABOVE)either answered that he did not know or "unsure" and this agitated Hazman and the other defence lawyers who took turns to cross examine.
He also said there were five vehicles involved in the search for the murder site and they consisted, Koh’s team, the police vehicle carrying him, ASP Tony’s team, the IPK KL and Bukit Aman forensics team and DSP Gan’s team.
During re-examination Tun Abdul Majid, who was also perplexed with Zainol’s inability to recall his memory, asked him to explain why he had answered earlier that he did not know who had instructed Azilah to go to the Brickfields police station when Lunggan had told him that he will be taken to IPK KL after Azilah turned up at Brickfields.

Zainol said he did not understand the question properly.
Lawyer Wong Kian Kheong also grilled Zainol, who answered in the same manner, "can’t remember or don’t know" when asked if any investigations were undertaken following the submission of an affidavit by his client, Abdul Razak Abdullah Baginda.
= = == = = = =

ABOVE: The boxes of evidence on Day 22 Trial

July 19, 2007 22:33 PM
Azilah Not Abused, Beaten Or Encouraged During 'Interview'

SHAH ALAM, July 19 (Bernama) -- Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri was not beaten, abused, threatened, encouraged or promised something in an "interview" during which he allegedly disclosed the location where Altantuya Shaariibbu was shot and blown up.Chief Inspector Koh Fei Cheow, 38, from the Kuala Lumpur police headquarters' major crime investigation division told this to the High Court here Thursday.He said Azilah was physically healthy and in "normal condition" when he and his two staff interviewed the first accused in the murder of the Mongolian woman at his office on Nov 6 last year.
When examined by Deputy Public Prosecutor Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah, Koh said Azilah did not make any complaint to him or his two staff on the treatment received during the interview.
He said although Azilah and him were of the same rank, he was more senior than Azilah and during the interview, Azilah was handcuffed.

Tun Majid: "Did you hit him?"
Koh: "No."
Tun Majid: "Used rough language?"
Koh: "No".
Tun Majid: "Abused him?"
Koh: "No"
Koh said his two staff also did not encourage, give promise or threaten Azilah "because they were under my command" and they were present during the interview as "escorts and to assist him on the facts of the murder case because he had just returned from leave".
Asked whether the two staff knew about the facts of the case, he said: "More or less."

Tun Majid: "Did they suggest anything to the first accused about the case?"
Koh: "No."Tun Majid: "What do you mean by 'assisting'? What are their roles?"
Koh: "They conducted the interview on the location of the incident. I have no knowledge when, where or how it happened. That was why I asked the two staff to assist me on this matter."Koh said they did question Azilah but he did not remember the questions posed by them to Azilah
= = == = == = =

What happened yesterday (Day 22)
>
Kuala Lumpur police contingent headquarters special investigations unit head Supt Zainol Samah was cross-examined by the defence and re-examined by the prosecution;
> The next prosecution witness was Chief Insp Koh Fei Cheow of the Serious Crimes Investigation Division of IPK KL. He was the one who arrested both murder accused, and later went to the alleged crime scene; and
> The hearing resumes on Monday (July 23).

ABOVE & BELOW: Abdul Razak arriving on Day 22 Trial

BELOW: The hooded one could be either Azilah or Sirul

= == = == == = = =from Bernama

July 19, 2007 18:13 PM
Azilah Points To Spot With Human Bones

SHAH ALAM, July 19 (Bernama) -- An investigating officer from the Kuala Lumpur police headquarters Major Crime Division said he found what were believed to be human bones and bone fragments at an area pointed to him by Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri. Chief Inspector Koh Fei Cheow said the bones could be clearly seen among some undergrowth on a hill known as Puncak Niaga Empangan Tasik, Subang, Selangor.In his testimony in the High Court here Thursday, he said the discovery was made at 6.20pm on Nov 6 last year.

Koh said Azilah, also told him that the spot where the bones were found was also where a Mongolian woman (Altantuya's name was not mentioned) was blown up.

Azilah, the first accused in the Altantuya Shaariibuuu murder trial, also brought Koh to an open space about 30 feet (nine metres) away from the first spot, and he (Azilah) told him that this was where the Mongolian woman was shot earlier.He said policemen who brought Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar along arrived at the place five minutes later.
Azilah, 31, and Sirul Azhar, 36, both from Bukit Aman Police Action Squad, are charged with murdering interpreter and part-time model Altantuya, 28, at a location between Lot 12843 and Lot 16735, Mukim Bukit Raja, here between 10pm on Oct 19 and 1am on Oct 20, 2006.
Political analyst Abdul Razak Abdullah Baginda, 47, is charged with abetting the two policemen in the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur between
9.54am on Oct 18 and 9.45pm on Oct 19, 2006.

Watch Video Clip - Day 22 Trial

Loaded, see Next post fr the Video Link

= = = == = == = = =

= = == == = == = =Below Day 21 Trial Report

Believe in Altantuya’s ghost? No, call her spirits. (see Below details)

ABOVE & BELOW: Malaysiakini Early news (by Subscription) with updated Video on Day 21 Trial
= = == = == = == = The Visit to pay their respect and appease her spirit??

ABOVE: The gang of Lawyers at the site visit and BELOW: notable faces K K Wong & Kamarul Hisham
= == = == == = == = == = == = == = = =

ABOVE: Police personnel guarding the 4WD (where through the tinted windows, the accused can be seen)

Court visits Altantuya murder scene
R.Surenthira Kumar and Maria J.Dass from SUN

DAY 21

ABOVE & BELOW: The location spot of the crime scene visited by the court on 18th Jul 07

SHAH ALAM (July 18, 2007): Accompanied by a battery of press photographers and reporters, the High Court today visited the jungle clearing off the Puncak Alam road where Altantuya Shaariibuu's body was allegedly blown up with explosives. It was drizzling at about 3pm when more than 15 four-wheel drive vehicles arrived at the scene, carrying judge Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yasin, the prosecution team, defence lawyers and the three accused.

ABOVE: The Judge Datuk Mohd Zaki was there and BELOW: looked grimed looking at the spot

The clearing, which had been cordoned off for the visit, was nondescript and the only items alien there were a blue silk shawl (BELOW) tied around a young tree and a discarded crucifix.


The shawl had apparently been used during a prayer ceremony for the Mongolian. There were no visible burn marks on the ground or on the trees to indicate an explosion had taken place. The clearing was also covered with undergrowth. At hand to explain what had happened there were DSP Gan Teck Guan and ASP Tony Lunggann, the case investigators. The team spent about 15 minutes at the site. DPP Hanim Rashid told reporters the visit aimed to give the court a clear picture of what happened there. Except for DPP Manoj Kurup, who wore sports shoes, and DPP Noorin Badaruddin, who wore slippers, the others were in their usual court attire, minus their robes.


Noorin (ABOVE) had a red plastic bag which looked like a shower cap covering her head, while the others huddled under the few umbrellas available. Only Mohd Zaki had an officer holding an umbrella up for him.

ABOVE: The police cordoned off the area and photographers were prevented from doing their jobs

Some photographers scrambled to get shots of the lawyers at the site but had to keep behind a police cordon, while others tried to get shots of Cpl Sirul Azhar Umar and Chief Insp Azilah Hadri, who were brought to the scene. They did not alight from their vehicles and had their faces covered with their jackets, as usual.

ABOVE: Lead DPP Tun Abdul Majid being briefed by one of the investigating officer and BELOW: The dashing Lawyer Kamarul was also there
Reporters were taken by surprise this morning when DPP Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah announced plans to visit the crime scene in the afternoon. The site was located off the road from Guthrie Corridor to Puncak Alam. The access road to the scene is about 2km long and is badly maintained. By 1.30pm, most of the reporters were at the scene and some photographers positioned themselves behind trees to take shots of the murder accused. To their dismay, it started to rain heavily at about 2.30pm, and they scrambled for shelter. To keep their spirits up, some reporters sang Rianna's hit song Umbrella.

ABOVE: Is this the ACTUAL Burnt out Spot?? Mow Compare the photos BELOW - taken on Nov 8 06 AFTER the Crime was exposed


The whole court was there and so was Altantuya Shaariibuu spirit; She spoke in a dream to Susan Loone: (see H E R E for details)

“This is where I died (image on the left). In a jungle clearing in Puncak Alam in Shah Alam, Selangor, not very far away from the court house where you hear my name everyday. The men, who I believed bundled me away on the night that I died, now show you the way, to the place where I was so brutally attacked, blasted away, into a thousand pieces”.
“But what is the point of returning to this place, which holds nothing specific but memories of me, memories, no one can relate, for it was too cruel, too inhuman, too brutal, beyond imagination”
“Now judges, prosecutors, defense lawyers, reporters and drivers have come to visit me, in a place where they can no longer find my body. But what is the point of all these, when they have yet to find my murderers?”.

Believe in Altantuya’s ghost? No, call her spirits. A spirit is a soul that's still here on earth without its casing or body. Energy is not a spirit. It's a residue of a large amount of energy left behind upon the death of a person. When she was about to be murdered her fear, panic, anger and other emotions blasts out from her body until she really got killed which releases vast energy around that area she died at. Now, a psychic or a person who can feel energy (NOT those Court people) would be able to sometimes see the event happening again, but the spirit is not really there.

The easiest way to give a difference is that a spirit does not really repeat its actions, while energy will repeat its actions.
Remember "Everything" that exists, be it physical or non-physical, is made up of energy. And Energy can neither be created nor destroyed. It simply "IS". She will always be there in Puchak Alam.

Her Death is just only a night to her Soul

She had lived before, and will again, and her new life, in her terms, springs out of the old, and is growing in the old and contained within it as the seed is already contained within the flower.

= = == = = == = =

Delay in answering annoys judge

ABOVE: Supt Zainol Samah caught saying his daily prayers on Day 21 Trial outside the courtroom

SHAH ALAM (July 18, 2007): A senior police officer testifying in the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder trial earned the judge's displeasure for taking a long time to answer a defence lawyer's question. Head of the Kuala Lumpur police contingent headquarters' special investigations unit Supt Zainol Samah had earlier told the court that besides the three accused, the other suspects who were initially arrested and remanded included L/Cpl Rohaniza Roslan, private investigator P. Balasubramaniam and his assistant K. Suras Kumar. Zainol said this when answering a question from accused Chief Insp Azilah Hadri's defence lawyer, Hazman Ahmad. Judge Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yasin was noticeably annoyed when Zainol took some time to answer Hazman's question on whether they were considered suspects in the case when they were detained.

ABOVE: The evidence wheeled to court on Day 21 of Trial

Mohd Zaki asked Zainol:
"Can the police arrest people, if they are not suspects? Can the police arrest people at their whims and fancies?" Zainol, who was continuing his testimony which started yesterday, had told the court Azilah had turned up in the Brickfields district police headquarters before his arrest in the
Kuala Lumpur police contingent headquarters (IPK KL). He was unsure if Azilah had surrendered himself in Brickfields after being summoned there. To questions from Hazman, Zainol said Azilah was directed to go to Brickfields on Nov 1, before being taken to IPK KL where he was arrested. He also told the court a convoy of police vehicles, numbering about five, departed from IPK KL, along with Azilah and Sirul Azhar to the alleged crime scene located somewhere in Puncak Alam along the road to Kuala Selangor.

Among the police team were ASP Tony Lunggan, ASP Zulkarnain Samsudin, Chief Insp Koh Fei Cheow and Supt Amidon Anan and his forensics unit personnel. He said there were other police personnel but could not remember their names. DPP Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah asked Zainol about the location of the crime scene. He requested the court's permission to visit the site so they could better visualise the scene. Arrangements were made for four-wheel-drives to transport the parties to the site as the road was inaccessible by cars.
What happened today (Day 21)
* Head of the
Kuala Lumpur police continent headquarters' special investigations unit Supt Zainol Samah continued his examination-in-chief by DPP Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah;
* He was then cross-examined by Chief Insp Azilah Hadri's lawyer, Hasman Ahmad; and
* Court visited alleged crime scene in Puncak Alam, Shah Alam, at
3pm, staying for about 15 minutes.

= = == == = == = = === = == = = == Bernama’s account
July 18, 2007 21:20 PM
Judge Visits Scene Of Altantuya's Murder
SHAH ALAM, July 18 (Bernama) -- The prosecution Wednesday took judge Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yasin and members of defence team to the site where Mongolian woman Altantuya Shaariibuu was said to have been killed.
All those involved in the murder trial were taken in 10 police vehicles including eight four-wheel-drive, escorted by seven police outriders, to a hill near Puncak Alam at about 3.10pm.There, Deputy Public Prosecutor Noorin Badaruddin told the judge, during heavy rain, that a bush with trees averaging three metres in height was where the "object" was believed blown up. She also showed a clearing where the "object" was believed placed before it was taken into the bush. She also showed the trees where Altantuya's hair and flesh were found when bomb and forensic experts conducted investigations after Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri and Constable Sirul Azhar Umar disclosed the location.
Witnesses would be called to produce all the evidence, she said.
Azilah, 31, and Sirul Azhar, 36, are charged with murdering Altantuya, 28, between
10pm on Oct 19 last year and 1am the following day. Political analyst Abdul Razak Abdullah Baginda, 47, is accused of abetting them.
The three accused, who were taken to the site separately, did not get down from the vehicles. Azilah and Sirul Azhar still had their faces covered while Abdul Razak looked calm.
The visit took about 15 minutes. All those who were there wore slippers because of the rain. Only judge Mohd Zaki had an umbrella over his head while Noorin covered hers with a plastic bag.
Lawyer Karpal Singh who holds a watching brief for the Mongolian government and Altantuya's family, was not there but was represented by his son, Ram Karpal Singh. In the area, there was a tree with a long blue shawl tied around it. Also seen were several joss sticks, candles and two gold-coloured broken sticks.
== = == =

July 18, 2007 12:27 PM
Altantuya Murder Trial Accused To Be Taken To Crime Scene

SHAH ALAM, July 18 (Bernama) -- The accused in the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder trial will be taken to the crime scene Wednesday. High Court judge Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yasin, who is hearing the trial, and the prosecution team headed by deputy public prosecutor Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah and the defence team will also be going there at 2pm. Tun Majid told the court that only four-wheel-drive vehicles could access the area. Yesterday,
Kuala Lumpur police special investigation officer Supt Zainol Samah told the court that the accused, Chief Insp Azilah Hadri and Cpl Sirul Azhar Umar, had led police to the murder scene on the fringe of an open area in Puncak Alam heading towards Kuala Selangor.
Azilah, 30, and Sirul Azhar, 36, are charged with murdering Altantuya, 28, at a location between Lots 12843 and
Lot 16735 in Mukim Bukit Raja between 10pm on Oct 19 last year and 1am the following day.Political analyst Abdul Razak Abdullah Baginda, 46, is accused of abetting them in the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur between 9.54am on Oct 18 and 9.45pm on Oct 19 last year.

== == = == =Watch the Video Clip (1`min 7 sec) - Day 21 of Trial - She will Always be there in Punchak Alam


= === = = =

Check on the latest UPDATED Post on NAJIB H E R E

ON
More details & Watch and listen (34 s) his actual words and manner when he spoke as a matter of fact that Malaysia is an Islamic State

and also Khairy's View on Najib's Position within UMNO now:


Wednesday, July 18, 2007

MORE PICS & Video– RM3.6 Million Microchips Robbery - Malacca Schenker Logistics Warehouse; Chips arrived from Kulim for Electronic Factory

ABOVE: Warehouse and BELOW: The main gate

The computer microchip heist took place at 5.30 am on Tuesday after the consignment arrived at 3 am. The six masked robbers armed with machetes gained entry at the back after cutting the fencing and then overpower 3 Guards and a Lorry Driver & Attendant there. Police are unable ascertain the vehicle used in the robbery.

ABOVE: The cut fencing

The chips consignment arrived at 3am from Kulim and was for an electronic company in Batu Berundum. The police are trying to ascertain why the consignment was NOT sent direct to the factory on arrival

ABOVE: The cut telephone and BELOW: the empty van

= = == = == = == = = == = == =

= = == = == = =Watch Video Clip (39 sec) on Scene of robbery

= = = == = == = = =

MORE PICS – Day 20 Altantuya Murder Trial; Sirul & Azilah Led Police - Crime Location; Defence Queries Discrepancies - Overlapping Dates in CCTV Tapes

The appearance of the date 11-11-06 on a tape handed out on 10-11-06 should be a normal occurrence in any CCTV recording using tapes as the recording is continuous. Tapes are NOT changed at midnight exactly daily so this overlapping of the tape sequence time is expected. Also when recycled tapes are used, these are not completely rewind to the end and impressions of old recordings are left behind when these are not completely erased.

The figure 00:23:25 appearing should signify a new day 23 min 25 sec after midnight. So what is the fuss over these discrepancies. In the case of CCTV recording using DVR (Digital Video Recorder) on a hard disc; the recordings for a particular day can be retrieved exactly without overlap.See below, a better coverage from the STAR on the tapes controversy

DAY 20 Trial -17 2007, Tuesday, Court Views CCTV footage with new Video Equipment
ABOVE & BELOW: Malaysikini Headlines at midday-17 Jul 07
= == = = == = == = == = == = = == = == = == = =
ABOVE & BELOW: Malaysiakini Evening Updates
= = == == = == = =
ABOVE & BELOW: The accused arriving in Court on Day 20 Trial

Defence pounces on discrepancies in tape recordings

R. Surenthira Kumar and Maria J. Dass; from SUN
DAY 20
SHAH ALAM (July 17, 2007): The defence in the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder trial today pounced on stark discrepancies which appeared during a prosecution witness's testimony on Hotel Malaya's closed-circuit television (CCTV) recordings.

ABOVE: Loo, leaving court at Day 20 of Trial after being cross-examined on the CTTV footages

Cross-examining the hotel's operations manager Loo Mow Chan, Hasnal Rezua Merican, who is defending murder accused Chief Insp Azilah Hadri, zeroed in on the three video tapes taken by the police from the 50-year-old hotel employee.

Loo had previously testified he handed over the three VHS videotapes to the police on Nov 10 last year and he only saw the tapes again some time in May this year when the police asked him to replay the tapes so they could take photographs. One of the three tapes was replayed in court yesterday morning, using equipment supplied by the police forensics department and this time, the images were clear.

Hasnal Rezua asked Loo whether he remembered the time the recording started.
Loo: I think it was 00:48 or 00:49 on Oct 18, 2006. Hasnal Rezua: At the beginning of the tape, the number 11-11-06 appears, correct?
Loo: Yes. Hasnal Rezua: Would that be a recording for Nov 11, 2006?
Loo: Yes.
Hasnal Rezua: But it was your testimony that the tapes and documents were handed to Sgt Amran (Ab Aziz) on Nov 10, 2006?
Loo: Yes.
Hasnal Rezua: This is very bizarre. You handed the tapes on the 10th, but the recording on 11th appears. I do not propose to ask a question on that.
Loo had previously testified that due to the incompatibility of the playback system with the tape, there was a discrepancy in the timing which appeared on the top of the screen of the monitor used in court.
Hasnal Rezua: Yesterday, when the figure 00:23:25 appeared on the screen, you offered an explanation that the system used in the court could not read the time. Agree that you were venturing a guess on how the figures appeared?
Loo: I wouldn't know.
Datuk Mohd Zaki: You do not know how that figure appears?
Loo: Yes, I do not know.
Hasnal Rezua: And when viewing the image of the 7th floor, the figure was 00:26:42. Given that you have no technical expertise, you were again venturing a guess that the system could not read the time?

Loo: I did not say, yesterday, that the system cannot read the time.
Mohd Zaki: The counsel is saying that you were guessing since you did not have the technical expertise.
Loo: I said that the system was incompatible
Hasnal Rezua: But it is your guess that the system was incompatible?
Loo: Then, I will agree.
Hasnal Rezua also questioned Loo's explanation that the discrepancy in the timing of recorded images could be due to incompability of the player.
He said Loo was not an expert to say this.
Hasnal Rezua also asked Loo if he had noted the details of the three tapes seized by police and whether he had viewed them before the police took them.
Loo said he did not.
To another question on the different dates appearing on the tapes during replay, he said it was because the tapes were re-used.
Earlier, Loo told the court the hotel's recording system had never broken down since the inception of the CCTV system in 2001.
He had earlier testified that the system had broken down, as a result of which the tapes could not be played back in the hotel for the court to view.
He told Hasnal Rezua, upon being questioned, that the system malfunctioned sometime in June.

The lawyer also pointed out that the accidental erasure tab on the three video tapes had been broken and that the tapes were capable of recording up to 180 minutes only.
Loo said the tape supplier had told him the tapes could record for 24 hours.

What happened today (Day 20)
* Hotel Malaya operations manager Loo Mow Chan was cross-examined by the defence. CCTV recordings were played back in court using new equipment and this time, the images were clear;
* After lunch, Loo was re-examined by the prosecution; and

* After Loo stood down, Supt Zainol Samah (ABOVE), Kuala Lumpur police contingent headquarters' special investigation unit head, was called. He was the one who gave the instruction to arrest Chief Insp Azilah Hadri. He will continue his testimony today.

= = == = = =from the STAR, a better report on the confusion of several dates on the tapes due to recycling.

Wednesday July 18, 2007
Recording stamped ‘Nov 11’ queried
SHAH ALAM: The presence of a recording, date stamped Nov 11 last year, of the closed-circuit television system in Hotel Malaya left many with a sense of curiosity. This was because the videotape (footages taken by the hotel's surveillance cameras from
12.48am on Oct 18 to 12.49am the next day) had been surrendered to the police on Nov 10. When this videotape was being shown in court yesterday, the first few seconds had a date stamp of Nov 11.
Asked by DPP Manoj Kurup to explain the anomalous situation, the hotel's operations manager Jimmy Loo Mow Chan said: “This is my personal opinion. It could be a technical fault with the timing.”
Loo, 50, earlier agreed to a suggestion by counsel Hasnal Rezua Merican, for Kpl Sirul Azhar Umar, that the recording dated Nov 11 would have been made on the same day (Nov 11 itself).
He agreed with Hasnal that it was a “bizarre” occurrence because the recording appeared in the tape one day after it had been handed over to the police to facilitate the investigations into the case.
Cross-examined on the same point by counsel Hazman Ahmad, for C/Insp Azilah Hadri, Loo agreed that although the tape was meant for Oct 18, it also contained recordings made on several other days such as Sept 19, last year as well as on Aug 18 and 19, last year.
He said the reason was because the tape had been recycled many times.

The same tape is used on the same date every month but not always started at the correct time, which is at midnight. That's why we tend to get leftovers from previous months,” he said.

The trial continues today
= == = =

July 17, 2007 21:22 PM
Azilah, Sirul Agreed To Bring Police To Crime Scene, Court Told

SHAH ALAM, July 17 (Bernama) -- C/Insp Azilah Hadri and Koperal Sirul Azhar Umar agreed to bring and show to the police the place where Mongolian part-time model Altantuya Shaariibuu was killed in Puncak Alam, Shah Alam on Nov 6 last year, the High Court here was told today. Supt Zainol Samah, 42, a special investigations officer attached to the Kuala Lumpur Police, said he was informed by ASP Tonny Lunggan on Nov 5 that the two accused had "confessed". Supt Zainol, the prosecution's 19th witness on Day 20 of the Altantuya murder trial, said he then contacted Supt Amidon Adnan of the forensics department to arrange a team to be ready at the UITM building in Shah Alam. He said he then left his office and followed Tony's car to Shah Alam in his.

Zainol told the court that in Tony's car were Sirul Azhar, DSP Gan Tack Guan and other police officers, names of whom he could not remember. During examination-in-chief by Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah, Zainol said he left from the Kuala Lumpur police headquarters at 5.30 pm on Nov 5, 2006.

= = == =

ABOVE & BELOW: New Equipment used to playback the tapes on Day 20 of Trial

July 17, 2007 19:12 PM

Defence Disputes CCTV Recording In Altantuya Murder Case
SHAH ALAM, July 17 (Bernama) -- The defence in the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder trial in the High Court here today questioned the authenticity of the Hotel Malaya closed-circuit television (CCTV) recording of the images of two men, believed to be the accused. Hasnal Redzua Merican, counsel for the second accused, Cpl Sirul Azhar Umar, said it was bizarre that the video tape with the recording also contained images captured on Nov 11 last year, when the 17th prosecution witness, Jimmy Loo Mow Chan, had testified earlier that he handed over the video tape to a police officer the day before, that is Nov 10 2006. However, in the afternoon session, Loo, 50, Hotel Malaya's operations manager, explained under re-examination by deputy public prosecutor Manoj Kurup that the discrepancy was due to a technical fault.
Manoj: You notice that at the beginning of the tape it is printed 11-11-06 at time 17:04. Can you explain why that recording is on the tape if it had been handed to the police on the Nov 10 2006?
Loo: My opinion it that it could be a technical fault as to the timer.
Manoj: Timer or date?
Loo: As far as I know, it is the same.
Earlier, Loo admitted that he did not have the technical expertise to explain why there was a discrepancy in the CCTV recording.
Sirul Azhar, 35, and the other accused, Chief Insp Azilah Hadri, 30, are charged with murdering Altantuya, 28, at a location between Lots 12843 and 16735, Mukim Bukit Raja, between 10pm on Oct 19 last year and 1am the following day.
Political analyst Abdul Razak Abdullah Baginda, 47, is accused of abetting them.
Yesterday, Loo testified that there was a discrepancy in the time displayed on some of the images as the audio visual equipment used to play the tape in court was not compatible.
However, today he agreed that he was guessing when he said that.

= = = =Watch the Video Clip (1 min 25 sec) - Day 20 Trial




= = == = = =

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

MORE PICS & Video – Day 19 -Altantuya Murder Trial; 8 CCTV Images of Accused in White & Yellow-Blue T-shirts at Hotel lobby & lift areas, Oct 18 06

ABOVE & BELOW: Malaysiakini always had the story out on the same day (before others), get a subscription to read more H E R E

= == = == = == = = == =

ABOVE: The Court Room Scene - Day 19 Trial (trying to view the CCTV Footages, but the Equipment used was not compatible for VHS tapes)-with two monitors - one for the Judge and the other for the prosecution

DAY 19 TrialJul 16 2007

Enhanced - 8 CCTV Images loaded see below- they are real extracted from the tapes shown on TV

July 16, 2007 19:32 PM
Images Of Two Men- Believed To Be Azilah And Sirul Captured On Hotel's CCTV

SHAH ALAM, July 16 (Bernama) -- The Altantuya Shaariibuu murder trial was shown eight images of two men believed to be the accused, Chief Insp Azilah Hadri and Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar, which were captured on the closed-circuit television (CCTV) of Hotel Malaya, where the Mongolian stayed. The images were shown on the screen of a 21-inch television placed on the prosecution's bench in the High Court here.

Insert ABOVE: Pic of Sirul Azhar, Is that him?

ABOVE & BELOW: Image 1 - Taken with different cameras & from different angle

INSERT is enlarged of person, further enlargement is NOT possible as the pixel of this picture & the TV resolution is NOT high

= == = == = = == = = == = = == = == = =

ABOVE & BELOW: Image 2 - Taken with different cameras & from different angle

They revealed the two men, respectively wearing a white T-shirt and a yellow-blue striped T-shirt and pants, roaming the hotel lobby, the lift area, entering the lift and on the 7th and 11th floors between 4pm and 5pm on Oct 18 last year, a day before Altantuya was allegedly killed. Another television set was placed on the judge's bench for Justice Datuk Mohd Zaki Yasin who is presiding over the trial which entered its 19th day.

ABOVE & BELOW: Image 3 - Taken with different cameras & from different angle


Based on observation of the images which were not clear, the man in the yellow-blue striped T-shirt resembled Sirul Azhar, from the shape of his face and the physical aspect. At a glance, the other man looked like Azilah. Azilah, 30, and Sirul Azhar, 35, are charged with murdering Altantuya, 28, at a location between Lots 12843 and 16735, Mukim Bukit Raja, between 10pm on Oct 19 last year and 1am the following day.



= == = == = == = =




= = == == = =

Altantuya Did Not Complain, Hotel Employee Tells Court

SHAH ALAM, July 16 (Bernama) -- A Hotel Malaya employee in charge of the front office told the High Court here today that he had never received any complaint from Altantuya Shaaribuu when she was staying there in October last year.


N. Haridharan (ABOVE), 22, said if the Mongolian woman lodged complaints, he surely had recorded them and informed the hotel manager on duty. He also said that Altantuya checked into the hotel on Oct 9 at about 2am but because of the hotel policy, the registration form showed that she checked in on Oct 8. He said this in reply to Abdul Razak Abdullah Baginda's lawyer, Wong Kian Kheong, on the 19th day of trial for Altantuya's murder.

ABOVE: an artist impression of Chief Inspector Azilah and BELOW , Cpl Sirul

Two policemen (ABOVE) from the Special Action Squad -- 30-year-old Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri and Cpl Sirul Azhar Umar, 35, -- are charged with the murder while political analyst Abdul Razak, 46, is alleged to have abetted them. In previous proceedings, two Mongolian women who were with Altantuya, Uuriintuya Gal-Ochir and Namiraa Gerelmaa, said Abdul Razak's private detective, Suras Kumar, had harassed and threatened them at the hotel.

= = == = == =


ABOVE: The 3rd accused Abdul Razak arriving in court on Day 19 Trial
ABOVE & BELOW: The two hooded policemen arriving. Why are they helping their own people to dress in such a way to hide their faces or guilt?

Cloudy images from CCTV, prosecution sweats
R. Surenthira Kumar; SUN
DAY 19

SHAH ALAM (July 16, 2007): A technical hitch and obsolete equipment had the prosecution in the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder trial sweating today. Hotel Malaya's closed-circuit television (CCTV) system had recorded the images of two men entering and leaving the hotel's 8th floor, where Altantuya Shaariibuu stayed on Oct 18. One of the men wore a yellow shirt and dark coloured long pants and the other in light coloured shirt and dark trousers. The prosecution wanted the hotel's operations manager Loo Mow Chan, who was testifying on the 19th day of the infamous murder trial, to state that the images in the CCTV were taken in the hotel lobby and lift area on the 8th floor. Loo testified that they were.

At this point, the prosecution had problems trying to get the recording to be played back smoothly. Instead the playback went staccato and the images were also not clear. This is because the player used by the prosecution was not compatible with the video tape, the court was told. After a lot of time was wasted trying to register a clear image, the court decided to reserve as evidence the CCTV images.
Judge Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yasin said the images will be viewed later with the proper equipment.
Loo was continuing his testimony which started last Thursday (July 12).
The playback equipment consisted of two monitors, one for the gallery and the other for the judge, video cassette player and cable connector set. The monitor showed a 16-frame image of the 16 CCTV recordings at various locations in the hotel, from the lobby to the lift areas and also from the 3rd to the 10th floors.
The recordings played in the court began from
4pm to 5pm and after midnight on Oct 18, 2006.
Altantuya was allegedly murdered between 10pm on Oct 19 and 1am on Oct 20 2006.
DPP Manoj Kurup had a difficult time with the recording, playing it and rewinding it, to get to the images of the two men captured by the CCTVs on the lobby, lift area and the lift exits on the 7th and 8th floor.

Manoj then asked Loo to refer to the earlier photographs of the images taken by the police from the hotel's monitors and compare them to the images being shown on the monitors in the courtroom. At one point, Manoj asked why Loo had testified that the images were on the 7th floor whereas the recording showed it was on the 8th floor.
Loo (ABOVE) said he thought the images were on the 7th floor, when in fact the recordings were of the 8th floor, based on the markings on the 16-grain image.
Manoj: Can you explain why the clock is showing that time?
Loo: Because the system is not compatible with the player. The player cannot read the tape properly.
Manoj: So the timing as shown happens because this player has compatibility problem?
Loo: Yes
Manoj: Not because there is anything wrong with the tape?
Loo: Yes
Manoj: So if we play with a player that is compatible, the timing would not run?
Loo: Yes
Asked by Mohd Zaki if the system used in Hotel Malaya could be used to replay the recordings, Loo said it was out of order, but with their system, the recording could be viewed clearly.

"Are you going to get a replacement? The system is obsolete, isn't it?" asked DPP Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah.
Loo replied the replacement would be a new and better system.
Asked by Mohd Zaki if the DPP can get better equipment for the CCTV recordings to be viewed again when the afternoon session begins, Tun Abdul Majid said it had taken them two days to procure the present equipment.
"This system is obsolete," said Mohd Zaki to Tun Abdul Majid.

Loo was later asked on the guest list and he said Altantuya was registered into Room 817, then she changed to Room 801 and finally Room 821.
He said Altantuya checked in on Oct 9 and checked out on Oct 27.
Manoj also asked Loo about Room 823 which was registered under two unidentified persons names, but stopped short, saying the relevance of the question will be shown later.
= = == = == =
SHAH ALAM (
July 16, 2007): The prosecution's lack of preparation for today's hearing of the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder trial was glaring.
They were playing back Hotel Malaya's closed-circuit television (CCTV) recording of two men seen entering the hotel and going up to the 8th floor where Altantuya stayed on Oct 18. But the images were unclear, and could not be played back smoothly. Instead, the images came out in random order, and the reading of the time the images were caught was also wrong. The prosecution tried to fix it. The court's policemen had a go at it.

ABOVE: Loo trying to fix and get the images running but without success

Hotel Malaya's operations manager Loo Mow Chan (ABOVE) , who was continuing his testimony, had it going for a while but it then went on the blink. A technician from a TV station covering the trial was also asked to help. So did a police forensics department official. They were dealing with an obsolete system. The hotel's system had gone bust and the prosecution took two days to procure the player to do the job.
The prosecution took several breaks to try and overcome the problem.
In the end, judge Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yasin had to reserve using the CCTV recording and the images taken from it as evidence until the technical hitch was resolved.

Prosecution sweats
SHAH ALAM (July 16, 2007): The prosecution sweated today, defeated by outdated technology. They desperately attempted to show the court the CCTV images recorded in Hotel Malaya on Oct 18. The hearing took off late due to the technical failure. The prosecution and the policemen tried to solve the problem but failed. Later, the hotel's operations manager had a go at it but only had the video running for a while. Even technicians from a private TV station gave the prosecution a hand.
The images recorded by the hotel CCTVs turned out to be not very clear as the recordings were captured on VHS tapes which have been phased out. A police forensics department personnel who had been roped in to assist in the exercise, also gave up, as the equipment used when the tapes were retrieved by the department for investigation was different from the one used in court today. The prosecution took several breaks to solve the problem, causing judge Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yasin, to quip:
"I have been up and down (referring to him leaving and returning to his chair) the whole day." He also asked the prosecution how they would know if the recordings can be viewed clearly and in a smooth flowing manner tomorrow as the tapes would be in the court's possession and it can only be tested when the court resumes sitting. DPP Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah said it could be tested only tomorrow and hoped the private company engaged to do this would succeed. He added the police forensics department would also bring their equipment which was used by them when they took the tapes for investigations, in case the private company fails.

When court resumed hearing after lunch, Hotel Malaya front office assistant N. Haridharan, 20, confirmed Altantuya Shaariibuu had checked into the hotel at 2am on Oct 9. He said he had filled the particulars in the guest check-in form with Altantuya's name, date of birth, passport issuance date and her nationality.
He said Altantuya filled in the address requested in the form and was given Room 817 after she had paid a cash deposit of RM300.
During cross examination, lawyer Wong Kian Kheong asked Haridharan if the hotel room was equipped with a safety latch and a peep hole, he said yes.

What happened today (Day 19)
* Hotel Malaya operations manager Loo Mow Chan continued his testimony from last Thursday (July 12).
* Court had difficulty viewing the CCTV recording as the playback equipment was not compatible with the video tape. Judge decides to view it later with the right equipment.
* After lunch, Loo resumed testimony, followed by the hotel's front office assistant, B. Haridharan


= = = = = =Watch the Video Clip (1 min 44s) and Enhanced Images



= = = = = == = = == = == =

MORE PICS & Video – Altantuya Murder Trial – Day 19 -8 CCTV Images of Accused in White & Yellow-Blue T-shirts - Hotel lobby & lift areas, Oct 18 06

DAY 19 TrialJul 16 2007-- 8 CCTV Enhanced Images loaded see below- they are real extracted from the tapes shown on TV
Go H E R E for the details

ABOVE: The Court Room Scene - Day 19 Trial (trying to view the CCTV Footages, but the Equipment used was not compatible for VHS tapes)-with two monitors - one for the Judge and the other for the prosecution

= = = = = == = = == = == =

Monday, July 16, 2007

MORE PICS & Video – LCCT Disabled Protest against AIRASIA - Uncaring & Discriminatory Attitude; Where is your Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)?

UPDATE: DAY 19 TrialJul 16 2007

8 CCTV Images loaded see below

- they are real extracted from the tapes as shown on TV

July 16, 2007 19:32 PM
Images Of Two Men- Believed To Be Azilah And Sirul Captured On Hotel's CCTV

SHAH ALAM, July 16 (Bernama) -- The Altantuya Shaariibuu murder trial was shown eight images of two men believed to be the accused, Chief Insp Azilah Hadri and Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar, which were captured on the closed-circuit television (CCTV) of Hotel Malaya, where the Mongolian stayed. The images were shown on the screen of a 21-inch television placed on the prosecution's bench in the High Court here.


They revealed the two men, respectively wearing a white T-shirt and a yellow-blue striped T-shirt and pants, roaming the hotel lobby, the lift area, entering the lift and on the 7th and 11th floors between 4pm and 5pm on Oct 18 last year, a day before Altantuya was allegedly killed. Another television set was placed on the judge's bench for Justice Datuk Mohd Zaki Yasin who is presiding over the trial which entered its 19th day.

Based on observation of the images which were not clear, the man in the yellow-blue striped T-shirt resembled Sirul Azhar, from the shape of his face and the physical aspect. At a glance, the other man looked like Azilah. Azilah, 30, and Sirul Azhar, 35, are charged with murdering Altantuya, 28, at a location between Lots 12843 and 16735, Mukim Bukit Raja, between 10pm on Oct 19 last year and 1am the following day.



= == = == = == = =




More details & Pics will can besee in Next POST on Day 19 Trial, Go H E R E

= = == = ==





Protest held against AirAsia

SEPANG: More than 20 disabled and wheelchair-bound members of the Barrier-Free Environment and Accessible Transport Group (BEAT) held a protest against AirAsia for its refusal to take passengers who were completely immobile.

ABOVE: V Murugeswaran and BELOW: Aroika

The protesters, headed by the group's co-ordinator Christine Lee, and assistant co-ordinators V. Murugeswaran and Peter Tan, demanded AirAsia reviews its policies and takes reasonable steps to ensure facilities and services provided at the low-cost carrier terminal (LCCT) are non-discriminatory.


Include us: The Barrier-Free Environment and Accessible Transport Group holding the protest at LCCT yesterday. It wants AirAsia to review its policies and ensure it is disabled-friendly. Lee said that unlike KLIA, the LCCT does not incorporate aerobridges, which allow easier access for passengers to board planes. “Passengers are instead required to walk up a flight of boarding stairs – a daunting task when one is disabled from the waist down,” she said. Lee said that when booking AirAsia tickets online, a separate icon would appear on the website asking if the ticket purchaser would require “special assistance”. “If you clicked 'yes', then you won't be able to proceed with your booking.



“That's when I called AirAsia's call centre, and was told that they were unable to accept passengers who are completely immobile. “This is even stipulated in AirAsia's terms and conditions!” she added. Lee also said that AirAsia charged RM12 for renting out a wheelchair, which a passenger could use to go from the ticketing counter to the departure hall. “One would then have to go from the check-in gate to the aircraft without the wheelchair, which is quite absurd.” Murugeswaran pointed out that AirAsia also stipulated that the carriage of persons with limited mobility was subject to whether they were able to climb the boarding stairs unaided or aided.

Passengers who are unable to board the stairs without any assistance would be requested to travel with a caregiver or companion. “This is blatantly discriminating, unfair and unacceptable. We want to be independent and not have to rely on other people to chaperon us when travelling,” he said, adding that nothing has been done despite BEAT holding a dialogue with AirAsia on the matter more than two years ago. During the protest, BEAT also urged Malaysia Airports Bhd to ensure all new and old airports in the country are equipped with facilities to improve accessibility to disabled passengers. When contacted, an AirAsia spokesman said they were unable to comment on the matter at present.

= = == = =Watch the Video Clip (1min 7sec) - Demo Protest against AirAsia AT LCCT



= = == = ==

DATE : 15TH JULY, 2007, SUNDAY, 11 AM AT LCCT

PRESS STATEMENTS ON AIRASIA’S REFUSAL TO TAKE PASSENGERS WHO REQUIRE SPECIAL ASSISTANCE TO BOARD AIRCRAFT.

We, members of Barrier-free Environment and Accessible Transport Group ( BEAT), are gathered here this morning, to express our outrage and disappointment with AirAsia, for its refusal to take passengers who require special assistance to board the aircraft.

In AirAsia’s Terms and Conditions, it states :-

1. AirAsia is unable to accept passengers who are completely immobile
2. As access to our aircraft is by the boarding stairs, the carriage of persons with limited mobility is subject to whether they are able to climb the boarding stairs unaided or aided.
3. A passenger who is able to walk up the boarding steps unaided may travel without a carer.
4. If the passenger is unable to climb the boarding stairs without any assistance, then AirAsia will request that the passenger travels with a carer.

We find AirAsia’s terms and conditions blatantly discriminating, unfair and unacceptable !! A check with AirAsia Call Centre confirms that only those who DO NOT require special assistance to climb the boarding stairs are allowed to travel in AirAsia. These terms and conditions have denied disabled passengers and persons with limited mobility, their right to fly like everyone else !! These terms and conditions imposed by AirAsia has caused further inconvenience and hardship to them.

The freedom to fly should be applicable to EVERYONE including passengers who are immobile and persons with limited mobility who may travel unaccompanied but require assistance to go onboard the aircraft.

AirAsia, Asia’s leading and largest low fare airline, has failed to live up to its slogan “Now Everyone Can Fly”. It is obvious that “ Now Not Everyone Can Fly” and “ Now Not Everyone Is Allowed To Fly in AirAsia”.

AirAsia has failed in its responsibility and obligation to provide facilities and services without discrimination, harrassment and vilification of its passengers.

We are here to reaffirm our commitment to fight any form of discrimination against disabled persons !! Discrimination against any person on the basis of one’s physical condition is a violation of the inherent dignity and worth of the human person.

We are here to demand that AirAsia reviews its policies and takes reasonable steps to ensure that the facilities and services provided and the terms on which they are provided are non discriminatory !!

The provision of such facilities not only benefit disabled passengers but also senior citizens and international tourists who are wheelchair users and their family members who may choose Malaysia as their holiday destination. Besides this, it also further enhance the corporate image of AirAsia and tourism industry of Malaysia.

We also call on Malaysia Airports Berhad to make sure that all new and old airports be equipped with facilities to improve accessibility to disabled passengers.

We are deeply concerned that despite assurances from relevant authorities and Ministers, disabled persons continue to face barriers and discrimination in their everyday life.

Come this 31st August, Malaysians from all walks of life will be celebrating our country’s 50th year of independence. But disabled persons here are still struggling to understand and experience the meaning of independence.

We have internationally well known mega development projects called Southern Corridors, Northern Corridors, Eastern Corridors, etc, etc, but disabled persons are still struggling to get out of their house corridors !!

We have RapidKL which has launched 1200 new buses on the roads but none of these are accessible buses. Despite our appeals, Prasarana, a 100% government owned company, continues to purchase and launch non-accessible buses ! We have newly launched taxis which cannot take wheelchair passengers due to limited booth space filled with gas tank !

We have light rail transit system called STAR Line or Ampang Line and Monorail but are completely inaccessible ! Now, we have AirAsia, which has done the nation proud by being the fastest growing and largest low fare airline in the region, refusing to take passengers who are immobile requiring assistance to go onboard !

We call upon YAB Dato Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, as Prime Minister of Malaysia, to hear our cries and consider our pleas for full inclusion in the overall Masterplan and Masterpolicy of the country. We ask to be treated with the same dignity and respect as equal members of society and full citizens of the country.

We also urge our Prime Minister to review the proposed Disabled Persons Act and to endorse the “ UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities” to protect and guarantee disabled persons the same rights as other persons and to eliminate all forms of discrimination against them.

Thank you.

Christine Lee
BEAT Coordinator

V. Murugeswaran
BEAT Assistant Coordinator

Peter Tan
BEAT Assistant Coordinator

Barrier-Free Environment and Accessible Transport Group (BEAT) comprises 18 Organisations as listed below :-

• Persatuan Damai Orang-Orang Kurang Upaya Selangor & W.P
• Malaysian Spinal Injuries Association
• Persatuan Mobiliti Selangor & Kuala Lumpur
• Persatuan Orang-Orang Cacat Anggota Malaysia
• Society of the Blind in Malaysia
• Malaysian Association for the Blind
• Society of the Chinese Disabled Persons Malaysia
• Persatuan Kristian Shuang Fu untuk orang Kurang Upaya Kuala Lumpur
• Beautiful Gate Foundation for The Disabled
• Persatuan Pemulihan Orang Cacat Selangor & Wilayah Persekutuan
• Selangor Cheshire Home
• Malaysian Information Network on Disabilities
• Dignity & Services
• United Voice (Self-Advocacy Society of Persons with Learning Disabilities Selangor & Kuala Lumpur)
• Selangor Council for Welfare and Social Development
• Majlis Paralimpik Malaysia
• Malaysian Council For Rehabilitation
• Lovely Home-


MORE PICS – RM4.6 (or 6.1?) billion 180Km IPOH-RAWANG High Speed Double Rail Link Starts Early Next Year after 6-year Record Delay; A White Elephant?

Started in July 2000 and was scheduled to complete in June 2003 but was delayed due to non payment of cost overrun to initial contractor DRB-Hicom in 2003 and in 2005 re-awarded to UEM World Bhd and is now 99% ready and scheduled to start operation in early 2008 according to the Transport Minister who paid an inspection visit at the Ipoh end. Mitsui & Co Transport Systems is touching up the last part of the contract work as the infrastructure works are fully completed. Initially it was a 2-year, then 4-year and now a 6-year delay.
But what is the cost overrun? According to DAP’s calculations the original RM4.6 billion is now ballooned to RM6.1 billion. (see below)
= = == = == = == = == =

Scope of Electrified Double Track Project Between Rawang and Ipoh
This project involves the construction of a new track (179 km) and upgrading of the existing track to allow for a maximum design speed of 160 kph. The other components of the project involved the construction of 41 new concrete railway bridges, culverts, 14 stations, 40 overhead road bridges to eliminate all level crossings, overhead 25kV 50Hz electrification system, modern signalling and communication, Automatic Fare Collection system, land acquisitions and relocation of squatters.
The main objectives are:-
* to extend the existing commuter service from Seremban - Rawang sector to Seremban - Tg. Malim sector with an average number of service of 100 trips a day.

* introduction of a rapid intercity service, between Ipoh – Sentral KL for 16 services a day and ultimately 32 services a day.
* to upgrade existing rail infrastructure for the increase in track capacity for commuter, intercity and freight trains.
The balance of the infrastructure works which were spearheaded by UEM World had been completed on March 2007 and the system works by Mitsui Transportation Systems are expected to complete by end 2007. Testing and commissioning of KTMB’s train service will be conducted intensively to enable commercial operation by early 2008.

First phase of KTM Commuter Services between Rawang and Rasa stretch was officially launched by the Honourable Minister of Transport on 21 April 2007. Upon completion of the whole project by end 2007, KTM Komuter service will be extended up to Tanjung Malim and KTMB will be able to introduce the Rapid Intercity train service from KL Sentral to Ipoh with a journey time of 2½ hours.

= = = == =
July 06, 2007 21:26 PM
Rawang-Ipoh Double Track Almost Complete


SERDANG, July 6 (Bernama) -- The Rawang-Ipoh double track commuter train project is nearing completion, said Transport Minister Datuk Seri Chan Kong Choy. "It is almost 99 percent completed. I will be making inspections on it next week," he told reporters after launching the Permai Central Transport Hub near here today. The RM4.6-billion project spanning 180km, which will provide Rawang and Ipoh a high speed rail link, would be operational by early next year, he said.

ABOVE & BELOW: The tracks are ready and designed for 160 kph speed and so are 41 new concrete railway bridges, culverts, 14 stations, 40 overhead road bridges to eliminate all level crossings. Only waiting for Mitsui Transportation Systems to complete by year end the installattion, testing and commissioning of the electricals and controls.

Meanwhile, Chan said contractors involved in the Ipoh-Padang Besar double tracking project were working on its cost with the Economic Planning Unit (EPU), Finance Ministry and his ministry.
The 330km-project is expected to resume early next year and due for completion in 2012. It was postponed in 2003 to curtail government spending on mega projects.

ABOVE & BELOW: The Minister arrived in style - in a train

"Once this project is completed, we do not see any problem in operating a commuter train service between Penang and Ipoh," Chan said. On the Sultan Azlan Shah Airport upgrading project, he said a study was still underway to ascertain whether the project will just involve extension of the runway or include the expansion of the airport terminal building.

"My officers are meeting with the EPU and Finance Ministry to follow up on the matter. It might take two to three weeks to come up with the costing for the project," he said.
= == = = == = == =

Ipoh-Padang Besar rail project to start early 2008

`CONSTRUCTION work on the double-track electrification project from Ipoh to Padang Besar at the border with Thailand is expected to start early next year, Transport Minister Datuk Seri Chan Kong Choy said today.


ABOVE: The big IPOH signage at the newly renovated railway Station (BELOW). Now how many are traveling on a daily basis from Ipoh to Rawang or Ipoh to KL? Traffic increases only at the week-ends and end of the months. So this fast train service (2-1/2 hrs) journey might be a while elephant in the early days in its deployment!. Some might find it cheaper to take a train than to drive. And what would be a reasonable fare compare to the current bus fares?

At present KTM is charging RM8.10 from Rawang to Seremban (appro 80Km). So the 180 km Ipoh to Rawang would be around RM18.00? And Ipoh to KL RM22. 00? This is Double the Current bus fares! Who would then take a train if it is more expensive and not much faster?

However, he said the cost of the project, which would be under the Private Financing Initiative (PFI), was yet to be determined as the Transport and Finance Ministries have not concluded their negotiations with the MMC-Gamuda consortium involved.

ABOVE & BELOW: The Minister's arrival was given VIP treatment

“We expect the work to commence early next year. The Ipoh-Padang Besar project will take five years to complete,” he told reporters after concluding an inspection of the Rawang-Ipoh double tracking railway project by train.

ABOVE & BELOW: after nothing to see except the same double tracks and the station, he was briefed on the stages of construction

The 330-kilometre project north of Ipoh to Padang Besar was awarded to a consortium under MMC Corp and Gamuda Bhd three years ago but it was postponed in 2003 to curtail government spending on mega-projects.

Gamuda and MMC are expected to spend about RM9 billion on the project.— Bernama Jil 12 07

= = = =

Govt Mulls Proposal To Takeover KTMB - Chan

KUALA LUMPUR, July 7 (Bernama) -- The government is considering a proposal to revert Keretapi Tanah Melayu Berhad (KTMB) to a public body after 15 years of privatisation, said Transport Minister Datuk Seri Chan Kong Choy.

He said the Railwaymen Union of Malaya (RUM) had proposed to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi that the government take KTMB under its wings following losses by the company. "The ministry will study and prepare a report on the second memorandum sent by RUM to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi on May 31," he said at a dinner organised by RUM tonight.
RUM sent the first memorandum on the proposal to Abdullah on Oct 11, 2004.

KTMB was privatised on Aug 1, 1992. In 1997, it came under the supervision of the Merak Unggul Consortium, a company said to have incurred "losses running into millions of ringgit before tax." Chan said the ministry would support a proposal that would benefit the nation and sector but fell short of stating his support for the proposal by RUM.
= == = == ==

BACKGROUND toProject delays:

Date: Sep 2003
Rail project delayed by contractor claims
FRANCIS FERNANDEZ

THE steering committee set up by the Transport Ministry to oversee the RM4.6 billion, 180km Ipoh to Rawang double tracking project, hasn’t met for more than 10 months, sources said yesterday. Under the original plan, the special committee, headed by the Ministry’s secretary-general Datuk Zaharah Shaari, was to meet weekly with the lead contractors and the main sub-contractors of the project to help fast track the completion of the job, which has missed its target completion date by close to three years. The double tracking project was supposed to be completed by 2003, but now industry players say that it might only be completed by early 2007. The project is split into two portions. The first is the civil and structural works, which is worth about RM2.6 billion, and the second portion is the systems works, which is worth about RM2 billion. The lead contractor for the civil and structural works is DRB Hicom Bhd, while the systems works contract was given to Mitsui & Co Ltd, Japan's second largest trading company.
The system works can only start when the civil portion is 90 per cent complete. The civil and structural works is said to be about 85 per cent complete. Mail Money was told that the project is progressing at slightly under 0.5 per cent a month. At its peak, the progress was between 0.5 per cent and 1 per cent a month. Much of the delay is believed to be due to the variation claims put forward by the main contractors for the job. Both Mitsui and DRB have put in compensation claims, which in total exceed RM1 billion. It is believed that the steering committee hadn’t met partly because of the disputes regarding the financial claims, as the contractors want a clear picture if their claims will be paid.
Mail Money had previously reported that the Government is in the midst of negotiating with Mitsui over its claims, while the claims made by DRB might go into arbitration.

While its not known why the Ministry hasn’t called for a steering committee meeting, industry players say there is little value in calling for such a meeting now because the delay in the project is not because of logistics but is mostly centered on the financials.

= = == = =
Malaysia axes DRB-Hicom from rail job; 13 May 2005

Malaysia has removed DRB-Hicom Bhd as main contractor for the country's biggest rail project, which is behind time and over budget, sources familiar with the situation said on May 13. The government intends to give the remaining work on the RM2.60 billion project to UEM World Bhd, sources close to the government and the firms told Reuters.

The government, DRB-Hicom and UEM World declined to comment. DRB-Hicom, which has interests ranging from auto distribution to property and infrastructure, is 15.8% controlled by tycoon Tan Sri Syed Mokhtar Al-Bukhary.

A source close to the deal said DRB-Hicom, which faces a cost overrun of RM700 million, plans to ask the Transport Ministry to reconsider its decision but this could not immediately be confirmed.The source said the Transport Ministry terminated the DRB-Hicom contract two weeks ago."UEM was given the letter of intent about a week ago to take over the unfinished portion for RM1.10 billion," the source added."DRB is seeking to be allowed to finish the job if the government pays RM700 million to meet the cost overrun. The government could save RM400 million."
DRB-Hicom, which won the contract in 2000, has blamed the delays on factors such as land acquisition and late payments. "It's a complex project. The budget was tight from the outset," said a consultant working on the project. "You are looking at an extra RM1 billion." Newspapers have said work on the 180km track between Rawang and Ipoh is 65% complete, but 17 months behind schedule and RM700 million over budget.
The link is the second leg of an ambitious plan to modernise the country's rail system with two parallel lines of electrified track running the entire length of peninsular Malaysia.

= = == =
DRB-Hicom’s RM4.6bil rail contract terminated Sunday May 15, 2005

PUTRAJAYA: The Government will take over the Rawang to Ipoh electrified railway double tracking project from DRB-Hicom, the Transport Ministry said. It said in a statement yesterday that with the decision, the contract given to project main contractor DRB-Hicom on July 3, 2000 had been terminated. The balance of work under the contract would be given to another entity, which has yet to be appointed, the statement said. Arrangements to appoint a new party to take over the uncompleted works are now being finalised. The statement, however, did not indicate when the contract was terminated. It was reported that the RM4.6bil project was behind schedule and had gone over the budget. The 182km track is said to be 82% completed but is 17 months behind schedule. The latest completion date reported was 2007. KTM Berhad’s electrified double track sector in the Klang Valley now spans 150km covering Rawang, Seremban, Sentul and Port Klang. The expansion of the double track from Rawang to Ipoh is seen as an important part of the modernisation of the railway system. It aims to reduce travel time between Ipoh and Rawang from the present three and a half hours to two and a half.

= = == = == = == = =

DRB-Hicom fully paid for 'normal claims'
22 May 2005 11:45 AM

By Jimmy Yeow
The government has fully paid DRB-Hicom Bhd, the main contractor for the RM2.58 billion Ipoh-Rawang electric double-tracking rail project, for earlier agreed works, but not for some RM700 million in variance order for additional works. Second Finance Minister Tan Sri Nor Mohamed Yakcop said the "normal claims" had been fully paid. "The variance order is a separate issue," he told reporters after opening Avenue Capital Resources Bhd's “Bangunan Avenue” in Kuala Lumpur on May 20. He declined to elaborate. He was responding to a question on claims by DRB-Hicom that it had not been fully paid for completing 88% of the civil works of the project as well as some RM700 million in variation cost owed by the government. DRB-Hicom had mutually terminated the contract with the government in view of the huge debt owing by the government.
Nor Mohamed said the task of appointing the main contractor to replace DRB-Hicom was with Transport Ministry. “It is the government’s intention to complete it as soon as possible,” he said. United Engineers (Malaysia) Bhd (UEM), which is in talks with the government, is a front-runner for the job to complete the remaining works.
UEM subsidiary UEM Builders Bhd, which is a sub-contractor for the building of RM650 million worth of bridges in the rail project, said earlier on May 20 that it was keen to take up the responsibilities.

[…]
= = == = = == =

Media Statement; by Lim Kit Siang ________________________________

(Ipoh, Saturday): When Chan Kong Choy replaced Dr. Ling Liong Sik as Transport Minister in May 2003, one of his priorities was a “fast-track” programme to complete the RM4.6 billion Ipoh-Rawang electrified double tracking project which was one year behind schedule. The double tracking project was originally scheduled to be completed in 35 months in June 2003 from the commencement of the contract in July 2000.

Kong Choy’s first Ministerial initiative has proved to be an unmitigated failure as his “fast-track” double-rail programme has become a joke as the nation’s slowest ‘fast-track’ project to nowhere”!
This was vividly illustrated during the winding-up of the Transport Ministry in the 2006 Budget debate on Wednesday night.

As Kong Choy was overseas, I asked the Deputy Transport Minister, Tengku Azlan for the latest cost of the Rawang-Ipoh double-tracking project. The Deputy Minister did not know. I asked when the double-tracking project would be completed. The Deputy Minister did not know. What were the new contractual terms in the replacement of DRB-Hicom Bhd by UEM Builders Bhd as the main contractor for the project? The Deputy Minister did not know! In the middle of the year, the Transport Ministry had announced that the government was taking over the double-tracking project and handing it over to UEM Builders as the new “lead contractor”.

What is the progress of the double tracking project since the UEM takeover of the project from DRB-Hicom in the past five months? The Deputy Transport Minister does not seem to have any clue. The RM4.5 billion Rawang-Ipoh electrified double-tracking project is in two packages - the RM2.58 billion infrastructure works originally awarded to DRB-Hicom and RM1.9 billion systems works awarded to Mitsui & Co Transport Systems.
In my media statements in May 2005, I had said that despite Kong Choy’s “fast track” programme announced in September 2003, work had been at a standstill for a year because of the dispute over the variation orders claims amounting to some RM700 million by the lead contractor for civil and structural works, DRB Hicom. The questions which I posed to Kong Choy on
May 11, 2005 remains as valid now as five months ago, viz:

(i) whether UEM Group Bhd had replaced DRM Hicom as the lead contractor for the unfinished portion of 18% of the project at an additional cost of RM1.1 billion, hiking the infrastructure costs from RM2.58 billion to RM3.68 billion; and
(ii) how public interests are served by such last-minute “change of horse” in the lead contractor.
With the Deputy Transport Minister unable to answer simple questions in Parliament about the project, such as the new date of completion and its cost, I have reason to believe and fear that Kong Choy’s slowest “fast-track” project to nowhere is shaping up to be a mega-scandal in
Malaysia in the 21st century.
Kong Choy’s first duty on his return from overseas is to give a full and satisfactory explanation and accounting of his “slowest ‘fast track’ double rail project to nowhere”. He should explain why the one-year delay in the completion of the project when he took over as Transport Minister has now become at least a four-year delay if not longer – despite all the government talk about efficiency, accountability and integrity which are all absent in the “slowest ‘fast-track’ development project to nowhere”.

Kong Choy must explain what measures he had taken to ensure that the Rawang-Ipoh double-tracking project does not become a mega-scandal involving corruption on a major scale with the attendant crimes of criminal breach of trust and abuse of power.

= = == == = = =

Bursa Malaysia Announcement
Subject: Electrified Double Tracking Rail Rawang-Ipoh Project

Contents :
Further to our annoucement dated 13 April 2006, DRB-HICOM Berhad ("DRB-HICOM" or "the Company") is pleased to announce that the Government and the Company had amicably
resolved on the settlement for the payment of variation order and loss and expense claims in relation to additional works done on the Rawang-Ipoh portion of the Electrified Double Tracking Rail Project with the final and full settlement of RM425 million.

Subsequent to this, DRB-HICOM is in further discussion with the Government in regards to related issues pertaining to liquidated ascertained damages and release of performance bond. DRB-HICOM is hopeful and positive that this matter will also be amicably resolved in due course.

DRB-HICOM is thankful that the long-drawn episode has obtained the support and understanding of the Government of Malaysia, the relevant Ministries and Authorities and KTMB. DRB-HICOM also wishes to record appreciation to its Consultants and Sub-Contractors for their patience and understanding extended to the Company

.

= = = == = =

Kong Choy should explain why Transport Ministry terminated DRB-Hicom as the main contractor for the RM2.6 billion civil and infrastructure works for the Ipoh-Rawang electrified double-tracking because of DRB-Hicom’s RM700 million Variation Order (VO) claims but is prepared to recognize and pay for the RM700 million VO if UEM World takes over the unfinished 12% of contract for RM1.1 billion


2nd Media Statement; by Lim Kit Siang; (21/05/2005)

(Petaling Jaya, Saturday): A week after the Transport Ministry’s statement last Saturday announcing that the government had removed DRB-Hicom Bhd as main contractor of the RM2.6 billion civil and structure works for the RM4.6 billion Ipoh-Rawang electrified double-tracking rail project, the country is none the wiser about the whys and wherefores to the biggest failure of Datuk Chan Kong Choy in his two-year stint as Transport Minister as well as the biggest PMC (Project Management Consultant) failure to date.

One of the first challenges assumed by Chan when he took over as Transport Minister from the former MCA President, Datuk Seri Dr. Ling Liong Sik, in mid-2003 was to announce a “fast track” programme to complete the Ipoh-Rawang double-tracking project which was already two years behind the original schedule, i.e. to be completed in 35 months in June 2003 from the commencement of the contract in July 2000. In September 2003, Chan announced a “fast track” programme to complete the Ipoh-Rawang double tracking project before October 2005 for the new train service to start in early 2006.

The dynamo of this “fast track” programme was a steering committee which Chan formed and headed by the Transport Ministry secretary-general Datuk Zaharah Shaari to look after the progress of the project. Chan said the steering committee would meet weekly with the main contractors to solve the problems faced in the course of implementing the project. However, instead of meeting weekly, Chan’s “fast track” high-powered steering committee had not met for the past one year! Chan’s “fast track” programme was even slower than during Liong Sik’s stewardship of the Transport Ministry, achieving only some 42 per cent of the construction pace of the previous period. In the 39 months from July 2000 to September 2003, some 72% of the project was completed or an average rate of 1.8% completion of the project per month. However, in the 21 months of “fast track” under Chan, only some 16% of the project was completed, bringing the total completion of the civil works to 88 per cent, or an average rate of 0.76% completion of the project per month under the “fast traick”– which is only 42 per cent of the rate during Liong Sik’s time.
When Chan took over as Transport Minister, the Ipoh-Rawang double tracking was two years behind schedule. Now, there is a four-year delay, with the RM4.6 billion project ending up costing more than RM6 billion. This is because of the sharp jump in the costs of both the two packages of the RM4.6 billion Ipoh-Rawang double-tracking project – the RM2.6 billlion civil works by an increase of RM1.1 billion while the RM1.9 billion systems works awarded to Mitsui & Co. Transport System increased to RM2.4 billion with media reports of Mitsui’s RM450 million variation order claim.

It is clear that the main reason why the Transport Ministry has terminated DRB-Hicom as the main contractor for the civil and infrastructure works for the Ipoh-Rawang electrified double-tracking is because of the unresolved dispute over DRB-Hicom’s RM700 million Variation Order claims, which was submitted before Chan’s “fast track” programme.

DRB-Hicom had claimed that the RM700 million Variation Orders were valid and legitimate as they were made on the advice and instruction from several government agencies, including the Transport Ministry and the Public Works Department. This is however contested by the Ministry of Finance.
If the DRB-Hicom’s RM700 million Variation Order claims had been approved, Chan’s “fast tracking” of the Ipoh-Rawang double-tracking rail project would have remained on track, i.e. completion before October this year for the new service shortening the Kuala Lumpur-Ipoh journey to two hours and 15 minutes with all scheduled stops (an express rail journey will take one hour and 50 minutes) to begin early next year.

Without going into the merits or otherwise of the dispute over DRB-Hicom’s RM700 million variation order claims, Parliament and the Malaysian taxpayers are entitled to a full explanation from Chan Kong Choy why the government has taken the extraordinary position clearly against public interest of refusing to recognize the RM700 million Variation Order claims by DRB-Hicom, but yet prepared to recognize and pay for the whole Variation Order claims if the contract is taken over by UEM World, at a cost of RM1.1 billion (inclusive of the disputed RM700 million Variation Order claims) for the balance of the 12 per cent of unfinished portion of the contract.

Malaysians must find this most strange and inexplicable – why the government refused to recognize and honour DRB-Hicom’s RM700 million Variation Order claims which would have ensured that Chan’s “fast track” programme would have succeeded, and yet prepared to recognize the RM700 million Variation Order claims if the UEM World takes over the contract at an additional cost of RM1.1 billion for only 12% of the uncompleted portion of the project.

Get complete protection against viruses, worms and Trojan horse programs – CA Anti-Virus 2008! Click here for cheap hotels
www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from Multidimid. Make your own badge here.
Blogroll Me!

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Add to Google Add to Google
Google
 
Web powerpresent.blogspot.com