MORE PICS & Video – Massage Parlor Raid at Puchong – 28 Jun 2007; Conducted by 30 MPSJ and Jais Staff from 8pm to 4am; 25 Detained; RM80 fine for each

Cheap Massage Parlor Raid at Puchong on 28 Jun 2007;

Conducted by 30 MPSJ and Jais Staff from 8pm to 4am;

25 Detained all l0cal; RM80 fine for each

All the rooms were destroyed

= = =Watch the Video Clip (38 sec, good quality)

= == = == ==

MORE PICS & Video – Day 14-Altantuya Murder Trial; Sirul Did It – Confessed Azilah; Sirul Shocked When Told; Claims Confession under duress & forced

latest Trial on Day 15 (Monday 9th July 2007); 10.00 pm
More details will be in the next POST

Latest UPDATE: July 09 2007

5 grounds to reject 'confession'

R. Surenthira Kumar and Maria J. Dass, from SUN
SHAH ALAM (July 9, 2007): The lawyer defending murder accused Cpl Sirul Azhar Umar today gave five reasons why the court should not admit his client's "confession" that was made to his superior as evidence in the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder case. Kamarul Hisham Kamaruddin told trial judge Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yasin the burden was on the prosecution to prove that the "confession" by Sirul Azhar was made voluntarily. He was referring to the "confession" that Sirul Azhar's superior, ACP Mastor Mohd Ariff, said was made to him while they were on the flight back from Bangkok to Kuala Lumpur. In a trial-within-a-trial to determine the voluntariness of the "confession" and its admissibility, Sirul Azhar had denied he said anything to Mastor.

Kamarul Hisham (BELOW) submitted the five grounds by citing previous cases and authorities to support his argument.

The five grounds are:
* The prosecution has not proved that the alleged confession was made voluntarily;
* Sirul Azhar was not cautioned on his rights under Section 113 of the Criminal Procedure Code;
* It is unclear whether Sirul Azhar was under arrest when he was taken into Mastor's custody ("confession" not made before magistrate or judge);
* Statement supposedly made by Sirul Azhar was involuntary; and
* Sirul Azhar did not read, correct or sign any statement he allegedly made to Mastor, who had assumed the role of investigating officer, when he attempted to extract information on the murder.

Kamarul Hisham said the prosecution had failed to call two material witnesses, Sgt Jelima Tasiran and Cpl Zamri Abu Bakar, the two UTK personnel who accompanied Mastor to Islamabad to bring back Sirul Azhar. He said Jelima and Zamri, having been with Sirul Azhar, must give evidence to negate the fact they may have exercised duress on Sirul Azhar.
"The prosecution cannot reserve to call witnesses and decide to call later, for this does not discharge its burden of proof," said Kamarul Hisham.

He said the court must look into the entire transaction, from the time Sirul Azhar is picked up from his hotel room in Islamabad until he is taken to the Kuala Lumpur police contingent headquarters, to negate oppressive circumstances, not just the particular time the statement was made.
Kamarul Hisham said Mastor had gone to Islamabad with information and with that in his mind, he had formed an intention to compel Sirul Azhar to follow his instructions, to extract a confession from him. He said there was already effective arrest when Sirul Azhar was escorted by Mastor and the two UTK personnel, and seated between two UTK personnel and asked to carry a backpack to prevent him from escaping. Kamarul Hisham said Mastor did not handcuff Sirul Azhar but he said he would arrest Sirul Azhar if he tried to escape.
He said Mastor sat beside Sirul Azhar and asked him a question with a view to extracting a confession, and at the point of making that statement, Sirul Azhar submitted himself to custody and the confession became inadmissible. "The moment he opened his mouth to tell anything incriminating to Mastor, he was already in custody. That confession to Mastor is not admissible by virtue of Section 26 of the Evidence Act," said Kamarul Hisham. As for involuntariness, he said there are three categories involved - inducement, threat, and promise - but his team will only show suspicious surrounding circumstances when the statement was recorded. He said if confession is made under oppressive circumstances, it overrides the categories of inducement, threat and promise.
"It is our argument that the second accused was in a distraught state, under severe anxiety and mental strain, when Mastor asked him repeatedly for an answer," said Kamarul Hisham.

He said he believes the prosecution will raise the question of Sirul Azhar's credibility, but the defence had pointed out that he is a person who is easily confused and is not a calculative witness. He added that Mastor's testimony about what he observed of Sirul Azhar's state of mind was never challenged at all. "We ask that, based on the five grounds, the alleged confession by the second accused be held inadmissible as evidence," said Kamarul.

= = == == = == = == = == = ==
'It was voluntarily and not made under threat'

SHAH ALAM (July 9, 2007): DPP Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah submitted today there was no inducement for Cpl Sirul Azhar Umar to make a confession, and that it was done voluntarily. He said when Sirul Azhar's superior, ACP Mastor Mohd Ariff, 45, said that all was out and that there was nothing to hide, he did not mean to say "make a confession". However, two to three minutes after he asked him, Sirul Azhar made a statement to Mastor. "Mastor told the defence that if Sirul Azhar had not responded, he would have continued asking but this did not happen because he made the statement to Mastor two to three minutes after," said Tun Abdul Majid. He also noted that Mastor was not cross-examined on whether he induced, threatened or promised Sirul Azhar anything if he made a confession.
On why the prosecution did not call Sgt Jelima Dasira and Kpl Zamri Abu Bakar, the two Special Action Unit (UTK) officials who accompanied Mastor to Pakistan to bring Sirul Azhar back, Tun Abdul Majid said it was immaterial to the trial to call them as they were merely escorts. "Mastor was also never challenged on the method he used to extract a statement from Sirul Azhar and if it involved threat, inducement or promises," he said.

He said Sirul Azhar's credibility should also be questioned.
He said the accused had contradicted himself when he said Mastor had spoken to him in a normal tone and later changed his statement to say that Mastor had spoken to him in a commanding voice.
The accused also said he did not believe the story by Mastor that he was being taken back to Malaysia to clear the police's name following a police report lodged against him by his ex-wife, he said. "Sirul Azhar then admitted that he felt at that time that there was a bigger reason and when asked, he said berkenaan kes ini-lah (it's about this case)," said Tun Abdul Majid. Sirul Azhar told the judge he thought the bigger reason which caused him to be anxious may have been something like death involving his ex-wife. "The credibility of the witness should be questioned here because in my opinion Sirul Azhar knew the truth and knew he could not run away from it," he said.

"Sirul Azhar was caught in a compromising situation when he was told the real reason for him being brought home and he could not run away. He had no choice but to respond," he said. In wrapping up his submission, Tun Abdul Majid said: "The prosecution has discharged its burden of proving the confession was voluntary and not made under threat, violence or oppression and we ask the court that the confession by Sirul Azhar be allowed."

= = == == == = = =
Sirul already in custody, says lawyer

SHAH ALAM (July 9, 2007): Lawyer Wong Kian Kheong, representing Abdul Razak Baginda, said the information obtained outside Malaysia can be used as evidence. He said under the Aviation Offences Act, a Malaysian aircraft is considered to be Malaysian territory. Sirul Azhar, when he was being brought back here, had boarded a MAS Airbus 330 to fly from Islamabad to Kuala Lumpur via Lahore and Bangkok. As for the arrest, Wong said when Sirul Azhar agreed to return here from Pakistan, the police had taken him into custody, through the words used by them and their actions. On the question of Sirul Azhar's credibility, Wong said the court ought not to admit the confession if a reasonable doubt has been created.

"As for inducement, personnel with the rank of corporal was asked by his superior who had uttered several words before an answer was given. If that is not an inducement, what else?" said Wong.
= == = = == = == = == = = == == =

What happened today (Day 15)

* Justice Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yasin heard submissions on the trial-within-a-trial to determine admissibility of murder accused Cpl Sirul Azhar Umar's "confession" to his superior officer ACP Mastor Mohd Ariff.
* Sirul Azhar's counsel, Kamarul Hisham Kamaruddin, submitted on five grounds. He took up most of the morning.
* Abdul Razak Baginda's lawyer ,Wong Kian Kheong, followed suit before the lunch break.
* DPP Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah made his submission after lunch.
* Justice Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yasin (BELOW)to decide at 2pm today.

= = == == = ==
Question: Is second accused Cpl Sirul Azhar's alleged "confession" that he killed a Mongolian woman admissible?
Answers:
NO
Defence counsel Kamarul Hisham Kamaruddin
* The prosecution has not proved that the alleged confession was made voluntarily.
* Sirul Azhar was not cautioned on his rights under Section 113 of the Criminal Procedure Code
* It is unclear whether he was under arrest when he was taken into ACP Mastor Mohd Ariff's custody; "confession" not made before magistrate or judge.
* Statement supposedly made by him was involuntary.
* He did not read, correct or sign any statement he allegedly made to Mastor, who had assumed the role of investigating officer, when he tried to extract information on the murder.

YES
DPP Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah
* Sirul Azhar's credibility is questionable, as he had contradicted himself on several points.
* There was no need to call the two other Special Action Unit (UTK) officers who were with Mastor when he brought Sirul Azhar back from Pakistan to testify because they were merely escorting the accused.
* The confession made by Sirul Azhar was voluntary and not under inducement, threat or promises.
* Sirul Azhar had confessed to Mastor as his superior and not as an investigating officer.

Decision:
Justice Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yasin will give his decision at 2pm tomorrow.

= = = == = =

What happened today (Day 15)
* Justice Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yasin heard submissions on the trial-within-a-trial to determine admissibility of murder accused Cpl Sirul Azhar Umar's "confession" to his superior officer ACP Mastor Mohd Ariff.
* Sirul Azhar's counsel, Kamarul Hisham Kamaruddin, submitted on five grounds. He took up most of the morning.
* Abdul Razak Baginda's lawyer ,Wong Kian Kheong, followed suit before the lunch break.
* DPP Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah made his submission after lunch.

* Justice Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yasin to decide at 2pm today.

Question: Is second accused Cpl Sirul Azhar's alleged "confession" that he killed a Mongolian woman admissible?

Answers:

NO
Defence counsel Kamarul Hisham Kamaruddin

* The prosecution has not proved that the alleged confession was made voluntarily.
* Sirul Azhar was not cautioned on his rights under Section 113 of the Criminal Procedure Code
* It is unclear whether he was under arrest when he was taken into ACP Mastor Mohd Ariff's custody; "confession" not made before magistrate or judge.
* Statement supposedly made by him was involuntary.
* He did not read, correct or sign any statement he allegedly made to Mastor, who had assumed the role of investigating officer, when he tried to extract information on the murder.

YES
DPP Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah
* Sirul Azhar's credibility is questionable, as he had contradicted himself on several points.
* There was no need to call the two other Special Action Unit (UTK) officers who were with Mastor when he brought Sirul Azhar back from Pakistan to testify because they were merely escorting the accused.
* The confession made by Sirul Azhar was voluntary and not under inducement, threat or promises.
* Sirul Azhar had confessed to Mastor as his superior and not as an investigating officer.

Decision:

July 09, 2007 19:10 PM
Sirul Azhar Confused When He Allegedly Made His Confession, Court Told

SHAH ALAM, July 9 (Bernama) -- Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar was described in the High Court here today as a robot, in a state of confusion and emotionally oppressed, when he made the alleged confession to his superior on his involvement in the murder of Mongolian Altantuya Shaariibuu. His counsel, Kamarul Hisham Kamaruddin, submitted that Sirul Azhar was not the average reasonable man and could not even understand three questions which were put to him "in one string together". He said the court should not admit the confession as evidence as Sirul Azhar, who is from the Special Action Force, did not give it of his own free will to the squad's deputy commander, ACP Mastor Mohamed Ariff, during their flight from Bangkok to Kuala Lumpur on Nov 6 last year.

Kamarul Hisham said the confession was given involuntarily and was taken under oppressive manner as Sirul Azhar was in a distraught state, under severe anxiety and mental strain in the airplane on his journey back to Kuala Lumpur. This was because Mastor in his testimony had implied that Sirul Azhar must tell him the truth and that he (Mastor) would question him until he got an answer, he said. Kamarul Hisham was submitting at the end of a trial-within-a-trial to establish whether Sirul Azhar's confession to Mastor was given voluntarily.

= = == = = the Judge will decide tomorrow om the admissibility of the confession by Sirul
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC

ABOVE & ABOVE: ACP Mastor arriving in court on Day 14 of Trial. He seemed to enjoy all the attention and focus on him and BELOW: Sirul arriving; He testified in the afternoon in the "trial within the trial". The confession was made on the plane. More details soon

July 05, 2007 18:09 PM
Sirul Trembled When Azilah Exposed He Killed Altantuya

SHAH ALAM, July 5 (Bernama) -- Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar trembled and fidgeted when told that Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri confessed that he (Sirul Azhar) had killed and blown up Mongolian Altantuya Shaariibuu with explosives.

Police Special Action Squad assistant commander, ACP Mastor Mohd Ariff (ABOVE) said Sirul Azhar was clearly in a nervous state after he told him Azhar's revelation on their flight back to Malaysia from Pakistan. "Sirul took several minutes to respond to the allegation against him," said Mastor, when testifying as the 11th prosecution witness in the Altantuya murder trial at the High Court here today.

Sirul Azhar, 35, and Azilah, 30, both from Bukit Aman UTK, are charged with murdering Altantuya, 28, in Mukim Bukit Raja here between 10pm on Oct 19 and 1am on Oct 20, 2006. Political analyst Abdul Razak Abdullah Baginda, 46, is charged with abetting the murder. Mastor, 45, said that information on Azilah's revelation was obtained from CID deputy director Datuk Syed Ismail Syed Azizan, who had instructed him to bring Sirul Azhar back to Malaysia. Mastor said he told Sirul Azhar that the real reason for him to bring him back to Malaysia was over a missing Mongolian woman, and what Datuk Syed Ismail had informed him about Azilah's revelation during interrogation. Azilah's revelation was that the second accused (Sirul Azhar) had killed the Mongolian woman and blown her up with explosives.

"I told him (Sirul Azhar) that since the matter (killing) was now in the open after Azilah had exposed it, there was no need for him to hide anything," he said after he was asked by Deputy Public Prosecutor Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah to relate what happened on the flight. He said Sirul Azhar was seated next to him when he told him about the matter during the flight to Kuala Lumpur after their transit in Bangkok at 11.20am on Nov 6, 2006.

In his testimony yesterday, Mastor said he had initially told Sirul Azhar that he was ordered to immediately bring him back to Malaysia over a police report lodged by his ex-wife against him. Mastor also said yesterday that following orders from Syed Ismail, he left for Islamabad on Nov 4, 2006 accompanied by two UTK members to bring Sirul Azhar back who was on security duty for the Prime Minister who was visiting Pakistan.

Hazman Ahmad, counsel for Azilah, objected to Mastor's testimony today and asked that it not be recorded before the court could decide whether his client's confession was made voluntarily. Hazman: As long as Datuk Syed (Ismail) is not called, the witness' testimony is based on hearsay. We do not know whether the first accused made a confession to Datuk Syed (during interrogation). His (witness) testimony incriminates my client. If the witness is allowed to continue, it would be in the court records and would influence the court. It's better to hold a trial-within-a-trial. The court than began a trial-within-a-trial to decide whether the confession made by Sirul Azhar was voluntary and without threat or force.

The witness was again asked to take his oath to tell the truth before judge Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yassin.Mastor, who has been with the UTK for 19 years, said when tasked with bringing back Sirul Azhar from Pakistan to Malaysia, he instructed Sergeant Jelima Tasiran and Corporal Zamri Abu to accompany him to Islamabad, departing on Nov 4, 2006. Tun Abdul Majid: What was the reason you gave to bring the second accused back when you met him in Pakistan? Mastor: The reason I gave was that his ex-wife had lodged a report against him over a domestic problem and that he should return to Malaysia to solve it in order to protect the good name of the police

= = == =
Sirul Azhar murdered Altantuya, says police deputy commander

DAY 14
SHAH ALAM (July 5, 2007): Cpl Sirul Azhar Umar trembled and fidgeted when told that Chief Insp Azilah Hadri confessed that he (Sirul Azhar) had killed and blown up Mongolian Altantuya Shaariibuu with explosives. Police Special Action Squad assistant commander ACP Mastor Mohd Ariff said Sirul Azhar was clearly in a nervous state after he told him Azhar's revelation on their flight back to Malaysia from Pakistan.
"Sirul took several minutes to respond to the allegation against him," said Mastor, when testifying as the 11th prosecution witness in the Altantuya murder trial in the High Court here today.

ABOVE: the daily covered up Sirul in the trial and BELOW: What he looks like

Sirul Azhar, 35, and Azilah, 30, both from Bukit Aman UTK, are charged with murdering Altantuya, 28, in Mukim Bukit Raja here between 10pm on Oct19 and 1am on Oct 20. Political analyst Abdul Razak Abdullah Baginda, 46, is charged with abetting the murder. Mastor, 45, said that information on Azilah's revelation was obtained from CID deputy director Datuk Syed Ismail Syed Azizan, who had instructed him to bring Sirul Azhar back to Malaysia.

Mastor (ABOVE) said he told Sirul Azhar that the real reason for him to bring him back to Malaysia was over a missing Mongolian woman, and what Datuk Syed Ismail had informed him about Azilah's revelation during interrogation.
Azilah's revelation was that the second accused (Sirul Azhar) had killed the Mongolian woman and blown her up with explosives.
"I told him (Sirul Azhar) that since the matter (killing) was now in the open after Azilah had exposed it, there was no need for him to hide anything," he said after he was asked by Deputy Public Prosecutor Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah to relate what happened on the flight.
He said Sirul Azhar was seated next to him when he told him about the matter during the flight to Kuala Lumpur after their transit in Bangkok at 11.20am on Nov 6, 2006. In his testimony yesterday , Mastor said he had initially told Sirul Azhar that he was ordered to immediately bring him back to Malaysia over a police report lodged by his ex-wife against him.

Mastor also said yesterday that following orders from Syed Ismail, he left for Islamabad on Nov 4 accompanied by two UTK members to bring Sirul Azhar back who was on security duty for the Prime Minister who was visiting Pakistan.

Hazman Ahmad (ABOVE), counsel for Azilah, objected to Mastor's testimony today and asked that it not be recorded before the court could decide whether his client's confession was made voluntarily, reports Bernama.
Hazman: As long as Datuk Syed (Ismail) is not called, the witness' testimony is based on hearsay. We do not know whether the first accused made a confession to Datuk Syed (during interrogation). His (witness) testimony incriminates my client. If the witness is allowed to continue, it would be in the court records and would influence the court. It's better to hold a trial-within-a-trial.

The court then began a trial-within-a-trial to decide whether the confession made by Sirul Azhar was voluntary and without threat or force. The witness was again asked to take his oath to tell the truth before judge Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yassin.
Mastor, who has been with the UTK for 19 years, said when tasked with bringing back Sirul Azhar from Pakistan to Malaysia, he instructed Sgt Jelima Tasiran and Cpl Zamri Abu to accompany him to Islamabad, departing on Nov 4.
Tun Abdul Majid (ABOVE) What was the reason you gave to bring the second accused back when you met him in Pakistan?
Mastor: The reason I gave was that his ex-wife had lodged a report against him over a domestic problem and that he should return to Malaysia to solve it in order to protect the good name of the police.
Tun Abdul Majid: Did he believe the reason?
Mastor: I had a feeling he believed it.
Mastor said on the flight back to Kuala Lumpur after their transit in Bangkok, he revealed to Sirul Azhar the real reason for bringing him back to Malaysia when he was seated next to him in the MAS aircraft.
Tun Abdul Majid: What did you tell him?
Mastor: I told him that the CID deputy director Datuk Syed Ismail had instructed me to bring him back to Malaysia over the case of a missing Mongolian woman. Datuk Syed also told me that during interrogation, the first accused revealed that Sirul Azhar had killed and blown up the Mongolian woman.

Hazman once again objected to the recording of the testimony.
Tun Abdul Majid explained: We need to know what made the second accused confess. So, this evidence is relevant. Only the confession will be an issue, whether it was made voluntarily or not. If later it is decided that it (confession) was not done voluntarily, everything would be wiped out.
Judge Mohd Zaki: It was not a confession, but the real reason that the witness told to the second accused. Continue.
Mastor said although he expected Sirul Azhar to respond, he never coerced, forced, encouraged, pressured or promised him anything.
He said as Sirul Azhar's superior, he only asked him to tell the truth.
"I told him that the case was now in the open, Azilah had divulged what happened and so there was no need to hide anything," said Mastor, adding that Sirul Azhar was trembling and appeared anxious and took two to three minutes before he spoke.

Mastor said he did not record Sirul Azhar's response to Azilah's allegation as he was asking him as his superior and not as an interrogator.
He said on arrival at the KLIA, he informed Syed Ismail about Sirul Azhar's reply before handing him over to the D9 Unit in the Kuala Lumpur police contingent headquarters for further action.

Cross-examined by Sirul Azhar's counsel, Kamarul Hisham Kamaruddin (ABOVE) , Mastor said he knew of Sirul Azhar's involvement in the case before meeting up with him in Pakistan, and felt that he was a suspect who had to face the process of justice.

Mastor admitted to not giving Sirul Azhar earlier the real reason for bringing him back to Malaysia so as to facilitate his task. He said he instructed DSP Fisol Salleh to relieve Sirul Azhar of his duty but was not sure when Fisol asked him to surrender his pistol before leaving for Malaysia. The witness also said that Sirul Azhar, who left Pakistan without his luggage, was under the close watch of him, Jelima and Zamri throughout the journey.
He said in the car to Islamabad airport, Sirul Azhar was flanked by the two UTK members in the back seat.
Kamarul Hisham also queried the witness on the questions that were posed to his client and the answers given during the flight from Bangkok to KLIA.
Kamarul Hisham: Did you pose the questions to him in a commanding manner?
Mastor: Yes.
Kamarul Hisham: He responded?
Mastor: Yes.
Kamarul Hisham: Did you know then that whatever he told you could be used against him in court?
Mastor: Yes.
Kamarul Hisham: Do you agree that each time before the second accused replied, you did not caution him?
Mastor: Agree.
The witness also said that a special team of five to 10 UTK members was instructed to wait for their arrival at KLIA.

Sirul admits giving statement to superior officer

SHAH ALAM (July 5, 2007): Cpl Sirul Azhar Umar today admitted making a statement pertaining to his alleged involvement in Altantuya Shaariibuu's murder to a superior officer. He told the High Court here that that he did so out of restlessness after being asked repeatedly by ACP Mastor Mohd Ariff on a flight from Bangkok to Kuala Lumpur.
He said Mastor often raised his voice to get his response to Chief Insp Azilah Hadri's accusation that he had murdered and blown up a Mongolian woman.
Azilah, 30, and Sirul Azhar, 35, have been charged with murdering the 28-year-old woman.
Mastor had earlier told the court that he was ordered to go to Pakistan and bring home Sirul Azhar who was then on assignment to escort the prime minister on a visit to Islamabad.

On the way back, they made a stop over in Bangkok, reports Bernama.
Sirul Azhar made the admission when examined by his counsel, Kamarul Hisham Kamaruddin, in the trial-within-a trial to determine the admissability of his statement to Mastor in the trial proper.

ABOVE: Sirul as seen by the court artist in explaining th circumstances of his confession

Earlier, when asked by Deputy Public Prosecutor Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah, Sirul Azhar initially said he had never made any statement pertaining to his alleged involvement in the murder but changed his reply after been asked more than three times. Tun Abdul Majid: I say after two or three minutes Mastor gave the exact story (on Altantuya's murder), telling you what he had been told, you gave a response, reply or statement to him.

Sirul Azhar: Now I remember. I did give a statement.
Tun Abdul Majid: Is it now you just remember that Mastor did not ask repeatedly?
Sirul Azhar: He did, he asked repeatedly.
Sirul Azhar repeatedly said several times that the statement he made was following Mastor's firm tone, as though a demand. Mastor was then a commanding officer with the rank of superintendent in the Special Action Squad in which Sirul Azhar is a member.
"In the initial stage, his tone was less firm. Subsequently, he raised the tone and sounded firm. My feeling at the time was very shivering," Sirul Azhar said.
When asked by Kamarul Hisham why he changed his reply, he said: "I am confused because of too many questions". He said when he was told that he had to return to Malaysia because his ex-wife had lodged a report against him and this could tarnish the police's image, he did not believe it but still he had to abide by Mastor's order.

Asked why he did not believe the reason given by Mastor, Sirul Azhar said: "I did not believe it because we separated in 2004 peacefully without any family conflict. Therefore, I feel his statement cannot be trusted." He also said that when Mastor sat beside him in the plane, he became afraid because superior officers seldom met and talked with him. At the time, he was still thinking of what had happened to his wife.
Replying to Tun Abdul Majid who asked whether he felt that the excuse given was too petty because he had thought of something bigger and knew the reason, Sirul Azhar said: "I did not think towards that."
He said the anxiety seen in him at the time was because be thought his ex-wife could have been murdered. Besides, he said, he trembled while being with Mastor because of fear of the consequence if he was to be accused of murder.
When asked what would happen if he did not follow Mastor's order and tried to escape, he said: "I will be arrested. I am worried if disciplinary action is taken, including being sacked and so on."

Sirul Azhar said before he was brought home, he was assigned to give security escort to Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi in Islamabad. He was there for 10 days from Oct 31 to Nov 9.
Kamarul Hisham: Before you went for the assignment, did you apply for the issue of weapon?

Sirul Azhar: Yes, I did. I applied for the weapon on the 30th, a day before departing for Pakistan. It was a Glock 9mm.
Kamarul Hisham: After receiving the weapon, is it a UTK (Special Action Squad) procedure you have to keep the weapon until the duty ends?
Sirul Azhar: Yes.
Kamarul Hisham: Morning, Nov 5, 2006, where were you and what was your assignment?
Sirul Azhar: In the morning, I was assigned as a personal bodyguard to YAB PM. Then, I was on duty in a hotel in Islamabad. At the time, YAB PM was holding a press conference in a hotel room. Then, I stood guard outside the room. Then suddenly, an officer came, DSP Fisol, telling me to get up to a room to prepare food for a Datuk. DSP Fisol asked me to make a handover of duty. I then hurried up to the hotel room. I saw a colleague ready and waiting for the handover of duty and I was told by the colleague who was willing to accept the duty to hand over my pistol to him on ASP Azani's order. I had no other weapon except the pistol. Sirul Azhar said after handing over the pistol, he watched TV and it was then Mastor knocked and entered his room with two other UTK members. He said Mastor ordered him to bring home a pair of clothing and the rest would be taken care of by his colleagues.
Sirul Azhar, who has served with the UTK for 11 years, said he had never disobeyed orders and always followed those of his superior without question. He said on the way home, they stopped in Lahore and Bangkok. At the time, he was tightly guarded and was followed even into the toilet. Upon arrival in Malaysia, he was escorted by seven UTK officers from the door of the plane to the vehicle that took him to the Bukit Aman police headquarters where he was handed over to an investigating officer.

"If from the hotel in Islamabad, I was told to take a taxi alone to go to the airport to return to Malaysia, I would do so. I would return to Malaysia without being guarded as ordered by Mastor and I would not run away, not in Islamabad, Lahore or Bangkok," he said replying to Tun Abdul Majid. Sirul Azhar said that during the conversation with Mastor, he could hear clearly and no one sat in the seat near him in the plane and Mastor's questioning about his alleged involvement in the murder only stopped when food was served. Judge Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yasin fixed Monday (July 9) for all parties to submit their arguments for the trial-within-a trial.

Sirul Azhar murdered Altantuya, says police deputy commander

SHAH ALAM (July 5, 2007): The deputy commander of the police elite special action squad (UTK) said he was informed that Cpl Sirul Azhar Umar, the second accused in the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder trial, killed the Mongolian Russian interpreter last October.
Asst Comm (ACP) Mastor Mohd Ariff, the second in command in the UTK branch where Sirul Azhar, 35, was attached to, said the then Federal CID deputy director Datuk Syed Ismail Syed Azizan told him that it was Sirul Azhar who committed the murder.

Syed Ismail got the information from Chief Insp Azilah Hadri, 30, the first accused in the high-profile murder trial. Mastor, 45, the 11th prosecution witness, said while on a MAS flight from Bangkok to Kuala Lumpur, he explained to Sirul Azhar that he was bringing him back to Malaysia from the escort duty in Pakistan on the orders of Syed Ismail in connection with the disappearance of a Mongolian woman. Testifying on the 14th day of the widely-followed murdered trial, Mastor said Syed Ismail told him that Azilah had revealed during investigations into the murder case that the Mongolian had been murdered and her body was blown up with explosives and that it was Sirul Azhar who did that. Mastor, who had served with the Royal Malaysia Police force for 25 years and had 19 years experience with the UTK, said Sirul Azhar gave him an answer after he informed him of the matter, Bernama reported this morning.

High Court Judge Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yasin then ordered for a trial-within-a-trial to determine the voluntariness of Sirul Azhar’s confession. Giving evidence in the trial-within-a-trial, Mastor said he later asked Sirul Azhar to tell the truth. "The story has been exposed. I hope you tell the truth and you cannot hide anything," he said. Mastor said he observed that Sirul Azhar appeared worried and he responded late, about two or three minutes later.
Queried by lead prosecutor Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah, Mastor said he did not threaten, coerce or persuade Sirul Azhar to reply. Azilah and Sirul Azhar, both from Bukit Aman-based UTK operatives, are charged with murdering 28-year-old Altantuya here between 10pm on Oct 19 and 1am on Oct 20. Political analyst Abdul Razak Baginda Abdulah, 46, is charged with abetting them.The trio faces the death sentence if convicted.
= = ===

Altantuya murder trial: Sirul Azhar did it, said 11th witness
Bernama, SHAH ALAM, Thurs:
The deputy commander of the police elite Special Action Squad (UTK) said he was informed that Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar, the second accused in the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder trial, killed the Mongolian model in October last year.

ACP Mastor Mohd Ariff, the second in command at the UTK branch where Sirul Azhar, 35, was attached to, said the then Federal CID deputy director II (Administration) Datuk Syed Ismail Syed Azizan told him that it was Sirul Azhar who committed the murder.

Syed Ismail got the information from Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri, 30, the first accused in the high-profile murder trial.Mastor, 45, the 11th prosecution witness, said while on a MAS flight from Bangkok to Kuala Lumpur, he explained to Sirul Azhar that he was bringing him back to Malaysia from the escort duty in Pakistan on the orders of Syed Ismail in connection with the disappearance of a Mongolian woman.

Testifying on the 14th day of the murder trial, Mastor said Syed Ismail told him that Azilah had revealed during investigations into the murder case that the Mongolian model had been murdered and her body was blown up with explosives and that it was Sirul Azhar who did that.

High Court Judge Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yasin then ordered for a trial-within-a-trial to determine whether Sirul Azhar’s confession was made voluntarily

= == = = =Watch the Video Clip (1 min 44 sec) - Day 14 Trial

= = == = = == = = == =

Now see the latest post H E R E ON

MORE PICS & Video Clip – Mat Rempits (Bike hell riders of Malaysia) in Action along - Jalan Raja Laut, Jalan Tuanku Abdul Rahman, Bulatan jalan Pahang & Dataran Merdeka on the early hours of Sunday 1 Jul 07; 3 Bikes detained 6 Arrested (+ Form 4 Student)

MORE PICS & Video – Day 13-Altantuya Murder Trial; Special Action Quad Can Take Back Unused Explosive & Act like ROBOTS; "I've nothing to do with you"

Day 13 Video Clip Trial loaded

ABOVE & BELOW: Handling C4 explosives which are very flexible and can be moulded to any shape and placed anywhere

GoTo: Day 14 Trial, H E R E
= = == == = == = == = = =

Day 13 Trial, Jul 05 2007, 6.51am

DAY 13
July 04, 2007 21:21 PM
Some UTK Members May Bring Home Unused Explosives, Court Told

SHAH ALAM, July 4 (Bernama) -- A senior police officer told the High Court here Wednesday that it was possible for explosives not used during training are not returned by special action squad (UTK) personnel to the ordnance store.

The 11th witness in the trial for the murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu, Bukit Aman UTK deputy commander DSP Mastor Mohd Ariff (ABOVE), said yes when Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah asked him whether the quantity of explosives taken out of the store was recorded. He also said in the affirmative when asked whether it was possible for the balance not used was not returned to the store. When asked: "Is it based on trust that materials not used need to be returned?", Mastor replied: "Yes." He said no records were made on the quantity of explosives used in training and there was also no clear procedure to inspect houses of UTK members for bullets, explosives and firearms.

ABOVE: Sirul (left) and Azilah both have explosive usage training

So, he said, he had no knowledge of any officer or personnel of other ranks who kept such items at home. Generally, he said, there was a procedure requiring all personnel to return explosives not used during training to the ordnance store. Earlier, Mastor who has served with the UTK for 19 years, was asked whether he knew Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri and Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar and was asked to identify the two accused in court. He said he knew Azilah as UTK Combat Diving Unit Operations Inspector while Sirul as Communications Unit Corporal in the same unit. He also said each subordinate member in the unit was required to carry out their official duties by following all orders of their superiors without question."In other words, UTK members are like robots," asked Tun Abdul Majid.( BELOW)

"For subordinate members, yes. Like robots. Only receiving orders from superior members," Mastor said. He said that when carrying out his official duty, Azilah, though he was not Sirul's immediate officer, could give orders to Sirul and his instructions need to be followed without being questioned by subordinate personnel. He said that as UTK officer and personnel, the two accused were involved in assignments to escort VVIPs, namely the prime minister and deputy prime minister, and they were allowed to carry firearms when doing the job.

Azilah and Sirul had also undergone the basic training with explosives, he said and added each UTK member had to undergo such training. In the training, Mastor said, they were taught to identify the shapes and uses of explosive materials as well as the way of preparing an explosive charge. Besides that, he said, Azilah had undergone a combat diving specialised training and body-guarding -- a technique to guard VVIP whether on foot or in vehicle. He also said each UTK officer was allowed to carry firearm round-the-clock including when he was not on duty and they were not required to return the weapon to the store, except when they went on leave, throughout their service with the unit. "This is because for the officers, when they receive a call for an operation, they have to go straight to the location from their houses or quarters," he said.

He said a different rule applied to UTK subordinate members as they were allowed to carry and keep firearms only while on duty. Tun Abdul Majid: "Can you explain the procedure to take firearm out of armoury?" Mastor: "Each operative is required to fill an application form and is given the approval for six months for each application. It means, in each January they need to fill the form and the approval is valid until June. "Then, they only need to register out and register in the weapon at the store. If the assignment is more than a week, they need to sign a new entry on Friday each week." Tun Abdul Majid: "What about to take out firearm for training?" Mastor: "For officers, the weapon is considered belongs to them. For subordinate members, weapons come from the pool and kept in the armoury." Tun Abdul Majid: "Officers' weapons are with them?"

Mastor: "Only pistols. An Mp5 needs to be taken from the store. The same procedure is used for bullets."= = == =

More suspense with Sirul's confession tomorrow (Day 14 Trial)

SHAH ALAM (July 4, 2007): Expect more suspense in the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder trial tomorrow when the prosecution submits a confession made by Cpl Sirul Azhar Umar, 35, the second accused.The confession was made before the deputy commander of the Unit Tindakan Khas (UTK) or Special Action Squad in the Bukit Aman police headquarters on Nov 5, 2006.

"I'm introducing a confession which will ensure a trial within a trial. Perhaps we can continue tomorrow," said Deputy Public Prosecutor Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah, who is heading the prosecution, today before the afternoon's proceedings ended.

The confession was made by Sirul to DSP Mastor Mohd Ariff on a flight from Pakistan to bring him (Sirul) back to Malaysia, reports Bernama.
Mastor, 45, the 11th prosecution witness, today testified that he was instructed to withdraw Sirul from his security duty in Pakistan at the time.
Mastor, who has served the police force for 25 years including 19 years with the UTK, said Sirul could not believe it when told that his duty of accompanying the Prime Minister in Pakistan was withdrawn and ordered to return to Malaysia immediately.

Mastor said Sirul kept pestering him to divulge the real reason for him to be asked to return to Malaysia as he was not safistied when told that he had to solve a problem over a police report lodged by his (Sirul's) ex-wife against him.
The witness said that on last Nov 4, he and another two UTK members left for Islamabad, Pakistan, after being instructed by the CID deputy director II to bring Sirul back.
He said he met up with Sirul in a hotel room there about five hours before their flight home. Originally, Sirul should return on Nov 9.

Mastor said Sirul agreed to return and they had to transit in Lahore and Bangkok enroute to Malaysia. Tun Majid: Before arriving in Bangkok, did the second accused (Sirul) ask you anything?
Mastor: Yes. In Lahore, he asked again the reason as he didn't believe that he was brought back due to his ex-wife's police report.
Tun Majid: What did you tell him?stor: I said I would tell him the real story after we left Bangkok by MAS (Malaysia Airlines) flight to KL.
Mastor said while they were on transit in Bangkok, Sirul asked him again and he replied "`when we get on the plane, I'll tell you".

"I've nothing to do with you ..."

SHAH ALAM (July 4, 2007): "I've got nothing to do with you. If you want to do anything, go ahead," Abdul Razak told Mongolian Russian interpreter Altantuya Shaariibuu in his office last August. These words were heard by the political analyst's secretary, Siti Aisyah Mohd Azlan, 24, when Altantuya met Abdul Razak at the front door of his office, the Malaysian Strategic Research Centre.

Siti Aisyah (ABOVE & BELOW) who referred to Altantuya as Amina in her testimony in court, said it was a chance meeting as there was no prior appointment made.

= = == = == = == = ==

Questioned by counsel Wong Kian Kheong (ABOVE)during cross-examination whether Abdul Razakhad hit or threatened Altantuya,
Siti Aisyah said "No".
Siti Aisyah, the 9th prosecution witness, said Abdul Razak did tell her about Altantuya's visit and that she had extorted money from him, adding that because of this, he told her not to let Altantuya into the office.

She said she also knew about the hiring of private investigator P.Balasubramaniam for the same purpose (to prevent Altantuya from seeing Abdul Razak).
Wong: You said Amina (Altantuya) came to the office three times. Did Amina also make phone calls to the office?
Siti Aisyah: Yes. She made several calls.
Wong: Did Amina tell you where she came from?
Siti Aisyah: She said she was calling from Korea. I did not ask her where she came from.
She said when Altantuya called or came to the office, she was never told that Abdul Razak threatened her, adding that she was also not told about the police report made by Altantuya against him.

Abdul Razak did casually tell her about the visit by an officer from the Special Action Squad (UTK) on Oct 18, she added.
Wong: Do you agree that that day was Chief Insp Azilah Hadri's first visit to the office?
Siti Aisyah: Yes, and his only visit.
Wong: Agree that after the meeting with Azilah, that Abdul Razak worked as usual?
Siti Aisyah: Agree.
Wong: Did Abdul Razak ask you to keep the meeting as confidential?
Siti Aisyah: No.
Siti Aisyah said as Abdul Razak's secretary, she knew that he frequently travelled overseas on official duty, including his trip to Hongkong on Oct 24 (first day of Hari Raya Puasa) and that his daughter Roweena and wife Mazlinda Makhzan would fly to England the next day.

Asked about Abdul Razak's character while she was working with him, Siti Aisyah said: "He was a good boss, funny and not violent." She said she also did not believe that Abdul Razak had abetted in the murder of Altantuya, adding that she did not know who committed the murder.

Wong: Did Abdul Razak tell you that police had told him that Azilah killed Altantuya?
Siti Aisyah: I can't remember. I'm also not sure whether Abdul Razak told me how he knew about the murder.
She said on Nov 7, Abdul azak went to the police station to give a statement but he did not tell her for what purpose.
During a 15-minute break, reporters teased Abdul Razak about him being funny. Smiling, he responded: "Well, I made some little jokes in the office."

Cross-examined by Hazman Ahmad (ABOVE) , counsel for Azilah, Siti Aisyah said her testimony yesterday was based on what Abdul Razak had told her, that Azilah had killed Altantuya while she did not have the facts.

She admitted that the information was hearsay and did not know what transpired between Azilah and Abdul Razak when the two men met in the latter's office.

Hazman: Just now you said you did not know who murdered Amina (Altantuya). You did testify that he (Abdul Razak) said Azilah did it. Agree that at that time you had no personal knowledge of who committed the murder?

Siti Aisyah: Agree.
Hazman: You said Azilah accused Abdul Razak of ordering the murder of Altantuya. How did you know about this?

Siti Aisyah: Abdul Razak told me.
Hazman: Did you hear this being said by Azilah to Abdul Razak?

Siti Aisyah: No.
Hazman: Did you know whether it happened or not?

Siti Aisyah: I did not know.

The witness said she gave her cautioned statement to the police four times conducted by Chief Insp Shawal Osman and ASP Aidah Othman, and what she said in court was the same as her statement.

Hazman: Agree that since there were four statements recorded on the same matter, you could have given four different versions?

Siti Aisyah: I disagree.

Hazman: Agree that when there were four statements, you didn't tell thetruth?

Siti Aisyah: I disagree.

She also disagreed with Hazman's contention that there were certain facts in the cautioned statement that were suggested by the police.

Siti Aisyah said on Nov 7, DSP Lim Meng Seah came to the office to take Abdul Razak to the police station, and two to three days after that Abdul Razak returned to the office with a few police officers.

Earlier, before today's hearing began, the 13th day of the trial, the court staff made a "wise" move by fixing a microphone at the witness stand to make the proceedings audible for everyone in court.

Azilah, 30, and Cpl Sirul Azhar Umar, 35, both from the federal police Special Action Squad, are charged with murdering Altantuya, 28, in a location between Lot 12843 and Lot 16735, Mukim Bukit Raja, near here, between 10pm on Oct 19 and 1am on Oct 20. Abdul Razak, 46, is charged with abetment, committed in the Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur between 9.54am on Oct 18 and 9.45pm on Oct 19.

ABOVE: Day 13, wife Mazlinda and daughter Roweena waiting in vain for the wave from Abdul Razak as BOTH his hands were tied behind his back after complaints from other defence lawyers (see bottom story) that he was given special treatment

Security guard's quirky demeanour enlivens hearing

SHAH ALAM (July 4, 2007): The sometimes dead pan expression of a security guard and his extremely poor memory when testifying, enlivened today's hearing of the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder trial after 12 "tense" days. Mohamad Zaini Zainordin, 21, the chief security guard at the Lembaga Getah Asli Malaysia (LGAM) building, first took three minutes to remember his home address. Mohamad Zaini, the 10th prosecution witness, said he was on duty on the night of Oct 17 and completed his 12-hour shift the next day. When asked to read out one of the names recorded in the LGAM Visitors' Book, he said, "There's a name, Azilah binti (daughter of) Hadri, drawing laughter from the gallery including Azilah himself, the first accused. The witness was asked to look again at what was written in the visitors' book by Deputy Public Prosecutor Raya Hanim Rashid before giving his reply. In the book, the court was told, was an entry on the visit by Chief Insp Azilah Hadri, 31, from 9.54am to 11.05am, reports Bernama

However, Mohamad Zaini said he did not know who wrote it down.

Hanim: Who is responsible for the visitors' book? Is it not you as the head?

Zaini: (It's the responsibility of) anyone on duty at the security counter.

When asked to identify DSP Lim Meng Seah who had taken the book from him, Mohamad Zaini made a startled, comical expression.

Judge Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yasin seemed baffled over the witness holding such a responsibility of overseeing 10 other guards.

"Last year, you were aged 20 and already a chief security guard!" quipped the judge, drawing laughter from the gallery.

Altantuya murder trial: Azilah upset over photographers’ action

SHAH ALAM, Wed:, Bernama, Via NST

The first accused in the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder trial, Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri is upset that some media photographers yesterday had tried to pull away his jacket which he used to cover his face when he came to court. His feeling was conveyed by his counsel Hazman Ahmad in the High Court here today which is hearing the high-profile murder trial. Hazman said that yesterday, a group of photographers had encroached the police boundary and acted aggressively as Azilah, 30; Lance Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar, 35; and political analyst Abdul Razak Abdullah Baginda, 46; the other accused, were taken from the court to the lock-up. He said Azilah was also unhappy with the special treatment given to Abdul Razak’s wife, Mazlinda Makhzan who was allowed to accompany her husband to the lock-up, resulting in him and Sirul Azhar to be handcuffed separately at the back, as instructed by Bukit Aman. Judge Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yasin then asked whether the relatives of the first and second accused were given the same privilege.

Hazman: No. Azilah and Sirul Azhar were handcuffed at the back after the directive was given. Yesterday, there was a commotion on the way to the lock-up. The photographers encroached the police boundary and tried to pull my client’s jacket away. He’s asking for some space and not to be harassed by the media like that.

Mohd Zaki: What do you want the court to do?

Hazman: To advise them not to go beyond the boundary.

Mohd Zaki: This happened outside the courtroom.

Hazman: I have to inform the court. My client is under the court’s supervision.

Wong Kian Kheong, counsel for Abdul Razak, then said that his client was also handcuffed at the back like the other two accused.

Hazman said he did want the incident to happen again as it could disrupt the court proceedings, adding that yesterday it took him 15 minutes to persuade Azilah to return to the lock-up.

Wong said he was only informed about the purported special treatment for Abdul Razak’s wife this morning.

“It is not wrong for a wife to accompany her husband to the lock-up, but if instructed not to do so, we will abide. It’s not an issue,” he said.

Hazman: The issue here is that my client had his face covered but it is not against the lock-up rules. A serious thing happened yesterday when a photographer tried to remove the jacket from him.
To diffuse the situation, Mohd Zaki said the incident happened outside the courtroom over which he had no power to make a decision, but would ask the relevant parties to solve the problem. Meanwhile, outside the court, the photographers said the incident was not their doing and as there were so many of them, anything could happen during the commotion yesterday

ABOVE: Karpal Singh still watching carefully on behalf of the Mongolian family Shaariibuu Setev & its Government

= = == = ==Watch the Video Clip - Day 13 Trial

= = == == = == = == = = =

MOR PICS & Video – Day 12-Altantuya Murder Trial; Siti Aisyah: Azilah killed Her; Rohaniza’s 5 contradictions; Threatened, Tortured & Promised Freedom

UPDATE: Day 13 Trial, Jul 04 2007, 10.19 pm

MORE Details in coming next blog
= = = =

DAY 13

July 04, 2007 21:21 PM
Some UTK Members May Bring Home Unused Explosives, Court Told

SHAH ALAM, July 4 (Bernama) -- A senior police officer told the High Court here Wednesday that it was possible for explosives not used during training are not returned by special action squad (UTK) personnel to the ordnance store.
The 11th witness in the trial for the murder of Altantuya Shaariibuu, Bukit Aman UTK deputy commander DSP Mastor Mohd Ariff (ABOVE), said yes when Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah asked him whether the quantity of explosives taken out of the store was recorded. He also said in the affirmative when asked whether it was possible for the balance not used was not returned to the store. When asked: "Is it based on trust that materials not used need to be returned?", Mastor replied: "Yes." He said no records were made on the quantity of explosives used in training and there was also no clear procedure to inspect houses of UTK members for bullets, explosives and firearms.

So, he said, he had no knowledge of any officer or personnel of other ranks who kept such items at home. Generally, he said, there was a procedure requiring all personnel to return explosives not used during training to the ordnance store. Earlier, Mastor who has served with the UTK for 19 years, was asked whether he knew Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri and Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar and was asked to identify the two accused in court. He said he knew Azilah as UTK Combat Diving Unit Operations Inspector while Sirul as Communications Unit Corporal in the same unit. He also said each subordinate member in the unit was required to carry out their official duties by following all orders of their superiors without question."In other words, UTK members are like robots," asked Tun Abdul Majid.

"For subordinate members, yes. Like robots. Only receiving orders from superior members," Mastor said. He said that when carrying out his official duty, Azilah, though he was not Sirul's immediate officer, could give orders to Sirul and his instructions need to be followed without being questioned by subordinate personnel. He said that as UTK officer and personnel, the two accused were involved in assignments to escort VVIPs, namely the prime minister and deputy prime minister, and they were allowed to carry firearms when doing the job.

Azilah and Sirul had also undergone the basic training with explosives, he said and added each UTK member had to undergo such training. In the training, Mastor said, they were taught to identify the shapes and uses of explosive materials as well as the way of preparing an explosive charge. Besides that, he said, Azilah had undergone a combat diving specialised training and body-guarding -- a technique to guard VVIP whether on foot or in vehicle. He also said each UTK officer was allowed to carry firearm round-the-clock including when he was not on duty and they were not required to return the weapon to the store, except when they went on leave, throughout their service with the unit. "This is because for the officers, when they receive a call for an operation, they have to go straight to the location from their houses or quarters," he said.

He said a different rule applied to UTK subordinate members as they were allowed to carry and keep firearms only while on duty. Tun Abdul Majid: "Can you explain the procedure to take firearm out of armoury?" Mastor: "Each operative is required to fill an application form and is given the approval for six months for each application. It means, in each January they need to fill the form and the approval is valid until June. "Then, they only need to register out and register in the weapon at the store. If the assignment is more than a week, they need to sign a new entry on Friday each week." Tun Abdul Majid: "What about to take out firearm for training?" Mastor: "For officers, the weapon is considered belongs to them. For subordinate members, weapons come from the pool and kept in the armoury." Tun Abdul Majid: "Officers' weapons are with them?"

Mastor: "Only pistols. An Mp5 needs to be taken from the store. The same procedure is used for bullets."= = == =

More suspense with Sirul's confession tomorrow

DAY 13
SHAH ALAM (July 4, 2007): Expect more suspense in the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder trial tomorrow when the prosecution submits a confession made by Cpl Sirul Azhar Umar, 35, the second accused.The confession was made before the deputy commander of the Unit Tindakan Khas (UTK) or Special Action Squad in the Bukit Aman police headquarters on Nov 5, 2006.

"I'm introducing a confession which will ensure a trial within a trial. Perhaps we can continue tomorrow," said Deputy Public Prosecutor Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah, who is heading the prosecution, today before the afternoon's proceedings ended.

The confession was made by Sirul to DSP Mastor Mohd Ariff on a flight from Pakistan to bring him (Sirul) back to Malaysia, reports Bernama.
Mastor, 45, the 11th prosecution witness, today testified that he was instructed to withdraw Sirul from his security duty in Pakistan at the time.
Mastor, who has served the police force for 25 years including 19 years with the UTK, said Sirul could not believe it when told that his duty of accompanying the Prime Minister in Pakistan was withdrawn and ordered to return to Malaysia immediately.

Mastor said Sirul kept pestering him to divulge the real reason for him to be asked to return to Malaysia as he was not safistied when told that he had to solve a problem over a police report lodged by his (Sirul's) ex-wife against him.
The witness said that on last Nov 4, he and another two UTK members left for Islamabad, Pakistan, after being instructed by the CID deputy director II to bring Sirul back.
He said he met up with Sirul in a hotel room there about five hours before their flight home. Originally, Sirul should return on Nov 9.

Mastor said Sirul agreed to return and they had to transit in Lahore and Bangkok enroute to Malaysia. Tun Majid: Before arriving in Bangkok, did the second accused (Sirul) ask you anything?
Mastor: Yes. In Lahore, he asked again the reason as he didn't believe that he was brought back due to his ex-wife's police report.
Tun Majid: What did you tell him?stor: I said I would tell him the real story after we left Bangkok by MAS (Malaysia Airlines) flight to KL.
Mastor said while they were on transit in Bangkok, Sirul asked him again and he replied "`when we get on the plane, I'll tell you".

"I've nothing to do with you ..."

SHAH ALAM (July 4, 2007): "I've got nothing to do with you. If you want to do anything, go ahead," Abdul Razak told Mongolian Russian interpreter Altantuya Shaariibuu in his office last August. These words were heard by the political analyst's secretary, Siti Aisyah Mohd Azlan, 24, when Altantuya met Abdul Razak at the front door of his office, the Malaysian Strategic Research Centre.

Siti Aisyah (ABOVE) who referred to Altantuya as Amina in her testimony in court, said it was a chance meeting as there was no prior appointment made.

Questioned by counsel Wong Kian Kheong (ABOVE)during cross-examination whether Abdul Razakhad hit or threatened Altantuya,
Siti Aisyah said "No".
Siti Aisyah, the 9th prosecution witness, said Abdul Razak did tell her about Altantuya's visit and that she had extorted money from him, adding that because of this, he told her not to let Altantuya into the office.

She said she also knew about the hiring of private investigator P.Balasubramaniam for the same purpose (to prevent Altantuya from seeing Abdul Razak).
Wong: You said Amina (Altantuya) came to the office three times. Did Amina also make phone calls to the office?
Siti Aisyah: Yes. She made several calls.
Wong: Did Amina tell you where she came from?
Siti Aisyah: She said she was calling from Korea. I did not ask her where she came from.
She said when Altantuya called or came to the office, she was never told that Abdul Razak threatened her, adding that she was also not told about the police report made by Altantuya against him.

Abdul Razak did casually tell her about the visit by an officer from the Special Action Squad (UTK) on Oct 18, she added.
Wong: Do you agree that that day was Chief Insp Azilah Hadri's first visit to the office?
Siti Aisyah: Yes, and his only visit.
Wong: Agree that after the meeting with Azilah, that Abdul Razak worked as usual?
Siti Aisyah: Agree.
Wong: Did Abdul Razak ask you to keep the meeting as confidential?
Siti Aisyah: No.
Siti Aisyah said as Abdul Razak's secretary, she knew that he frequently travelled overseas on official duty, including his trip to Hongkong on Oct 24 (first day of Hari Raya Puasa) and that his daughter Roweena and wife Mazlinda Makhzan would fly to England the next day.

Asked about Abdul Razak's character while she was working with him, Siti Aisyah said: "He was a good boss, funny and not violent." She said she also did not believe that Abdul Razak had abetted in the murder of Altantuya, adding that she did not know who committed the murder.

Wong: Did Abdul Razak tell you that police had told him that Azilah killed Altantuya?
Siti Aisyah: I can't remember. I'm also not sure whether Abdul Razak told me how he knew about the murder.
She said on Nov 7, Abdul azak went to the police station to give a statement but he did not tell her for what purpose.
During a 15-minute break, reporters teased Abdul Razak about him being funny. Smiling, he responded: "Well, I made some little jokes in the office."

Cross-examined by Hazman Ahmad, counsel for Azilah, Siti Aisyah said her testimony yesterday was based on what Abdul Razak had told her, that Azilah had killed Altantuya while she did not have the facts.

She admitted that the information was hearsay and did not know what transpired between Azilah and Abdul Razak when the two men met in the latter's office.

Hazman: Just now you said you did not know who murdered Amina (Altantuya). You did testify that he (Abdul Razak) said Azilah did it. Agree that at that time you had no personal knowledge of who committed the murder?

Siti Aisyah: Agree.

Hazman: You said Azilah accused Abdul Razak of ordering the murder of Altantuya. How did you know about this?

Siti Aisyah: Abdul Razak told me.

Hazman: Did you hear this being said by Azilah to Abdul Razak?

Siti Aisyah: No.

Hazman: Did you know whether it happened or not?