Saturday, July 15, 2006

MORE Pics - CRASH LANDING of CESSNA Aircraft at KL-SEREMBAN HIGHWAY; HIT LAMPOST broke WING; 2 PILOTS warded KL HOSPITAL

The experimental plane came to a halt with a broken wing



At about 3.30 pm today, a light weight 500 kg experimental aircraft was landing at the old airport in Sungei Besi airforce base when a strong gust of wind swept the two-seater single prop aircraft onto the busy KL-Seremban highway. The unscheduled landing attracted a large crowd of onlookers wanting to find out what was happening and a resulting massive traffic jam which lasted for more than an hour
Above: The crashed lamp post knocked down by the plane

According to a police spokesman, the aircraft hit a lamp post and broke its right wing and came to a halt. The pilot and co-pilot were slightly injured and taken to the KL Hospital for observation and treatment. The civil defense department and the RMAF rescue team cleared the aircraft off the road with police assistance.

Eventually a large crane was employed to lift the damaged aircraft slowly back to the hangar at the airport for a thorough D CA investigation.

The hoisted plane being guided back to the airport hangar



and here are the confliting reports from the papers

First Bernama reported yesterday that the light plane was coming in for a landing when a gust of wind forced it down in the highway... and later, "a crane was used to lift the aircraft" into the air base.

But the NST published a report today which had the plane experiencing difficulties while 'taking off'. And after the crash, the plane was 'towed to the air force base".

And The Star has a rather more dramatic account today, with the plane 'wrecked' after 'coming to a screeching halt' after it landed in the highway.

But at least one aspect of the incident appears to be conclusively proven true from the item in The Star - there was a Bernama pix which showed the plane [damaged but not quite wrecked in my opinion] being lifted by a crane, and not 'towed' as NST had it.

As for the time of the incident, it was at 3.26pm [so precise!]... or 3.45pm... or 3.30pm... depending on which account you read. I would have been more comfortable with 'about 3:30pm'.

These discrepancies in reporting are a big problem as most reporters are not witnesses to what was happening. And when under a deadline would sometime speculate as to what was happening and relied on heresay evidences in filing their reports.

the Bernama report

http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v3/news.php?id=208290

Light Aircraft Lands On Highway, Causes Massive Traffic Jam
July 15, 2006 18:03 PM

KUALA LUMPUR, July 15 (Bernama) -- A light aircraft made an emergency landing on the Kuala Lumpur-Seremban Highway, bringing traffic on the busy stretch adjacent to the Sungai Besi Air Force station to a standstill Saturday.

The yellow-coloured private experimental aircraft was descending on the runway when a strong gust of wind blew the 500kg two-seater, single-prop aircraft onto the busy highway at 3.26pm.

The aircraft then hit a lamp post and landed on the road before coming to screeching halt, a Royal Selangor Flying Club spokesman told Bernama.

He said the pilot and co-pilot were not injured in the incident.

The spokesman said the Civil Defence Department and Royal Malaysian Air Force rescue team cleared the aircraft from the road with police assistance. A crane was used to lift the aircraft, believed to be privately owned, into the air station.

The spokesman said the aircraft was not owned by the Royal Selangor Flying Club or the airforce. Traffic movement returned to normal at about 4.30pm when the road was cleared of the aircraft.

It is learnt the Department of Civil Aviation will conduct an investigation
into the incident. -- BERNAMA
and the NST account
http://www.nst.com.my/Current_News/nst/Sunday/National/
20060716080047/Article/index_html

Aircraft blown off course, lands on highway; 16 Jul 2006

KUALA LUMPUR: A two-seater Zodiac CH701 aircraft crash landed on the Sungei Besi Highway after it veered off its landing path.

The yellow aircraft, operated by the Royal Selangor Flying Club, was taking off at 3.45pm yesterday when it experienced difficulties, forcing the pilot to attempt an emergency landing at the Royal Malaysian Air Force base.

It is learnt the pilot was blown off course by strong winds.

The aircraft clipped a street light and damaged its right wing before coming to an abrupt halt on the highway, narrowly missing several cars. Traffic police sealed off a stretch of the north-bound highway near the air base.

The pilot and co-pilot were unhurt and air force emergency services personnel sprayed foam on the aircraft. The aircraft, imported from the Czech Republic, was towed to the air force base.

teh STAR account
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2006/7/16/nation/
14854584&sec=nation

Aircraft makes emergency landing on highway; Sunday July 16, 2006

KUALA LUMPUR: It wasn't the usual jam-causing mishap that motorists saw at the Kuala Lumpur-Seremban Highway.

A light aircraft made an emergency landing on the highway and brought peak hour traffic to a standstill for over an hour.

Pilots Lee Chong Yen, 69, and Atan Akmar Masbah, in his 50s, escaped the crash landing on the road adjacent to the Sungei Besi Air Force without injuries. Their CH-701 two-seater aircraft was, however, wrecked in the 3.30pm incident.

The yellow-coloured privately-owned aircraft was descending onto the runway when a strong gust of wind blew the 500kg single-prop aircraft onto the busy highway.

It hit a lamp post and landed on the road before coming to a screeching halt, according to a Royal Selangor Flying Club spokesman.

The spokesman said the Civil Defence Department and Royal Malaysian Air Force rescue team cleared the aircraft from the road with police assistance. Traffic movement returned to normal about an hour later.

BERNAMA’s FAUX PAS in the RUSH to Release DETAILS of REPLIES to Dr MAHATHIR Allegations. DISPATCH- Inaccurate, Incomplete and Duplication




Bernama our National News agency under the ambit of the government needs more vigilance in dishing out stories for the world to read. More so as they provide subscription-based news coverage in their News link service.

It looks like this blunder is the case of a "cut and paste" that has gone awry. They should have just cut the Appendix A and paste on it instead of rearrange the order and mess it up.

In their rush to release the TOP story PM's Dept Replies To Dr M's Allegations On Scenic Bridge on July 14, 2006 time stamped 16:05 PM and is still available at

http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v3/news.php?id=208088

they messed up the Allegations. There were a total of SIX in the Appendix A as in
Press Statement On Declassified Documents Pertaining To The Crooked Bridge
July 14, 2006 time stamped 16:40 PM available at

http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v3/news.php?id=2081054

In their haste they have duplicated the
ALLEGATION: That the government's decision to abort the bridge project will cause billions of ringgit in losses (see screen capture 2)

and completely left out
ALLEGATION: That the letter from Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong on April 11 2002 was the final commitment by the republic on the bridge proposal by Malaysia.

On first reading, it caused quite a bit of confusion for those who have not read both the releases.

read the earlier posting on
PM Datuk Seri Abdullah’s DEPARTMENT REPLIES TO ALLEGATIONS on SCENIC BRIDGE

and the lastest posting:
MPs ATTACK Air ASIA in Parliament; CEO TONY Fernandes response to Criticism; TRANSPORT Minister; Datuk CHAN K C defends LIFTING FLOOR Prices for MAS

Friday, July 14, 2006

P M Datuk Seri Abdullah’s DEPARTMENT REPLIES TO ALLEGATIONS on SCENIC BRIDGE – Documents DECLASSIFIED on Crooked Bridge; FACTS & CONCLUSIONS GIVEN

The Breaking News Headlines in Malaysiakini

What we have been witnessing along the past months is Dr Mahathir trying very hard to establish the truth to the questions. He is stating his facts, and you believe facts to be true? Therefore, it becomes an absolute, and that moves it into an expression of a truth, his truth.
Therefore, when Dr Mahathir spoke for his truth, the conflict is when other people also speak of their truth, that we want their truth to be our truth or vice versa.

There is no absolute, everyone speaks from his or her own truth. The point is you speak from your own beliefs, your own expressed beliefs and from the information and “facts” that you have. But facts are changing.. There are truths and there is the definition of a truth. A truth is some expression, which is translatable in every area of consciousness in some manner.

But our PM Datuk Seri Abdullah is a pragmatist. There are truths which are unchanging. But pragmatists do not believe in unchanging truths. All things, to the pragmatist, are changing; even truths. There is no truth within pragmatism! Our PM Abdullah is fully aware of the changing facts and is very much within his focus.

So with the support of the declassified documents, do we accept this new statement as the “absolute truth” of the matter in this scenic bridge saga?

the following is:
PM's Dept Replies To Dr M's Allegations On Scenic Bridge;
July 14, 2006 16:05 PM


KUALA LUMPUR, July 14 (Bernama) -- Former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad recently made several allegations on the Government's decision to abort the construction of the "crooked bridge" to replace the Johor Causeway.

The Prime Minister's Department said the Government wanted to set out the facts and sketch the historical background in which the decision to abort the construction of the bridge was reached.

Below are the allegations, facts and conclusions released by the Prime Minister's Department pertaining to the matter;

ALLEGATION1: That the Singapore Government accepted Malaysia's proposal to build a crooked bridge to replace the Malaysian side of the Johor Causeway.

FACTS: On March 4 2002, Dr Mahathir wrote a letter to Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew regarding Malaysia's proposal on the package of outstanding bilateral issues. Among other things, he proposed to build a new bridge on the Malaysian side at its own cost while Singapore would build the bridge on the Singapore side at its own cost.
Once the bridge was completed, the Johor Causeway would be demolished. Dr Mahathir further proposed that if Singapore did not build a bridge on its side, Malaysia intended to build a bridge on its side. Once this bridge was completed, the Johor Causeway on the Malaysian side would be demolished.

On April 11 2002, (the then Singapore) Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong replied and agreed although his preference was for a full bridge. However, that proposal was made in the context of the package approach for the outstanding bilateral issues which would be further discussed at ministerial and senior officials level.

On Oct 7 2002, Tun Dr Mahathir informed Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong that Malaysia had decided to discontinue discussions on the outstanding bilateral issues as a package and to give the highest priority to resolving the long -delayed water issue, particularly the price review of raw water supplied to Singapore. This move came because there appeared to be no agreement in resolving the issues as a package.

On Oct 14 2002, Goh agreed to discontinue discussions on the outstanding bilateral issues as a package. Singapore withdrew its agreement on the crooked bridge in the context of the package and stated that its earlier agreement to the bridge project was now not applicable.

Goh wrote: "...I had been prepared to make concessions in varying the Points of Agreement (POA) with extra pieces of land, allowing early withdrawal of Central Provident Fund (CPF) deposits and building our part of the bridge to replace the Causeway at our expense, as trade-offs, so that you give us airspace and future water at a fair price... Since you now want to deal with the water issue separately and discontinue the package approach, these trade-offs are no longer possible."

In effect, this letter signalled a return to a status quo position. Prime Minister Goh's statement was not challenged by Dr Mahathir. In fact, there was no reply to Prime Minister Goh's letter by Dr Mahathir.

Singapore reiterated its position in a diplomatic note on Nov 29, 2004 while the Customs, Immigration and Quarantine (CIQ) Complex in Bukit Chagar was being built.

It said: "... These negotiations on a package basis were unilaterally terminated by the then Prime Minister of Malaysia Dr Mahathir on Oct 7 2002."

With the termination of the negotiations on the package of issues, Singapore's agreement for the construction of the crooked-bridge no longer exists.

CONCLUSION: It is incorrect to say that Singapore accepted Malaysia's proposal to build a crooked bridge within its own territory. Singapore's acceptance for Malaysia to build a crooked bridge was at most a reluctant acceptance based on the package approach.

The Allegation2: That the letter from Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong on April 11 2002 was the final commitment by the republic on the bridge proposal by Malaysia.

The Facts: During negotiations between the two countries, there was an understanding that any proposal would not become final unless it was concluded in an agreement signed by leaders of Malaysia and Singapore. This was explained in a letter by Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew to then Minister of Special Functions & Minister of Finance, Tun Daim Zainuddin on August 24 2000.

The letter read: “To make it easier for us to write to each other, to test various options, all notes or letters I send to you or Mahathir, or vice-versa, will be treated as Without Prejudice: that there is no agreement until all points are agreed and signed by the two PMs.”

Conclusion: It is incorrect to say that Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong had given a commitment on the bridge in his letter on April 11 2002. There was no signed agreement between the PMs of Malaysia and Singapore on building the bridge.

ALLEGATION3: That the bridge was not part of the package of bilateral issues.

FACTS: At first, the outstanding package of issues only covered four areas - water, Central Provident Fund, airspace and the relocation of KTM's CIQ complex in Singapore. This was agreed to by both countries in Hanoi on Dec 27 1998.

But later, the bridge project was inserted into the package of issues. Dr Mahathir did so in a letter to Senior Minister Lee on March 4 2002 and the bridge issue became one of five issues in the package titled "MALAYSIA-SINGAPORE PACKAGE OF FIVE ISSUES - MALAYSIA'S PROPOSALS"

CONCLUSION: The bridge became part of the package of unresolved bilateral issues as a result of Dr Mahathir's letter.

ALLEGATION4: That the government's decision to abort the bridge project will cause billions of ringgit in losses.

FACTS: The total cost of building the CIQ, the crooked bridge and the new KTM line across the Johor Straits was RM2.379 billion.
At this moment, the Government is still working out compensation payment to Gerbang Perdana Sdn Bhd. But the fact is that the decision to abort the bridge was not an economic decision. Once it became clear that Malaysia could not build the bridge unilaterally or accede to Singapore's requests, calling off the plan to build the bridge was the most financially
responsible decision to make.

CONCLUSION: It would not have been advisable to spend RM1.13 billion on a structure and be stuck in limbo over its use.

ALLEGATION5: That Malaysia is a "half-past six country with no guts" by calling off the bridge project.

FACTS: Simply put, the Government had to make the right decision, taking into account the interests of Malaysians. It revisited the unilateral proposal by Dr Mahathir to build the crooked bridge but came to a finding that this was not an ideal solution.

A crooked bridge is not a legacy to leave for future Malaysians. In coming to its decision to abort the bridge project, the Government studied not only the Wayleave Agreements but also the Johor-Singapore Water Agreements 1961 and 1962, the Separation Agreement 1965 and took into consideration advice by the Attorney General's Chambers.

This is what the Attorney General's Chambers said: " ... the construction of the scenic half-bridge to replace the Malaysian side of the Johor Causeway must be studied in a holistic manner in view of the fact that the scenic half-bridge would have international legal implications in particular environmental impact to Singapore in and around the Straits of Johor.

"Apart from the above, the construction of the scenic half-bridge will involve the demolition of the Malaysian side of the Johor Causeway. The said demolition would directly affect the water pipeline located inside the Johor Causeway and water pipelines straddling the Johor Causeway. In this regard, legal implications thereof would have to be studied based on the 1961 and 1962, Johor-Singapore Water Agreements, Wayleave Agreements and Separation
Agreement 1965."

"Malaysia as a sovereign and independent state has complete power and authority over its territory and in exercising the said power and authority, no other state may interfere with its affairs. Nevertheless, Malaysia cannot take unilateral action without taking into consideration international law principles and requirements, among others, taking into account the rights and interests of its neighbouring states."

CONCLUSION: With so much uncertainty, it made sense for the Government to take a step back and do the right thing. Running the Government is not about scoring points or engaging in brinkmanship. It is about weighing the pros and cons and reaching a decision that is good for Malaysia.

ALLEGATION6: That Malaysia offered its airspace and sand to Singapore.
FACTS: The issue of allowing use of Malaysian airspace has been on the negotiating table between 1998 and 2002. Dr Mahathir himself inserted this issue in a letter to Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew on March 4 2002. He offered it as a trade-off during negotiations on the package of unresolved issues. With the de-packaging of the bilateral issues, the proposal made by Dr Mahathir is no longer relevant.

Singapore used to enjoy five flight privileges until 1998. It sought all those rights to be re-inserted but the Government of the day was only prepared to offer Search and Rescue and the Northern Transit Corridor rights on terms and conditions to be mutually agreed upon.

The rights of Search and Rescue was offered on the basis of reciprocity and is consistent with international practice. As for Northern Transit Corridor, it only allows RSAF jets to transit over the South China Sea. The jets will not be allowed to roam the Malaysian airspace.

CONCLUSION: The use of Malaysian airspace was raised by Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong during a meeting with Dato' Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi on March 1 2005 in Putrajaya. Singapore said that this issue was of importance to them and said that it would make selling the bridge idea to Singapore more palatable.

Remember, as far as the Republic was concerned, it did not see the need for a bridge to replace the Causeway. It wanted something in return for agreeing to the bridge deal and requested for sand and the use of airspace.
But once it became clear that the Malaysian public was strongly opposed to selling any sand or allowing RSAF jets to use its airspace, the government moved firmly and made the only acceptable decision - it aborted the plan to build the bridge.

Going ahead to satisfy the two conditions the Republic put forward would have meant going against the wishes of many Malaysians. The Government has always stated that its decision is a political decision based on the sentiments, sovereignty and integrity of the people of Malaysia.

-- BERNAMA

July 14, 2006 16:40 PM



Press Statement On Declassified Documents Pertaining To The Crooked Bridge

KUALA LUMPUR, July 14 (Bernama) -- Following is the full statement from the Prime Minister's Department on the declassified documents pertaining to the crooked bridge:

PRESS STATEMENT ON DECLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO THE CROOKED BRIDGE

The Government has declassified several relevant confidential documents and extracts thereof to allow Malaysians to understand why it has reached the decision to abort the bridge project to replace the Johor Causeway.

And in doing so, it has put the record straight on a string of allegations raised by the former Prime Minister, YABhg Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, namely that:

* the Singapore government accepted Malaysia's proposal to build a crooked bridge.

* the bridge was not part of the package of outstanding bilateral issues.

* Malaysia is a "half past six country with no guts" by not going ahead with the crooked bridge project.

* Malaysia put the issue of selling sand and allowing the Republic of Singapore Airforce to use its air space on the negotiating table.

This is only the second time in recent history that information protected by the Official Secrets Act 1972 has been declassified and approved for public consumption - an indication of the Government's seriousness in wanting the people who voted it into power to have the full facts, so that they can appreciate why the Government decided to abort the bridge project.

In the package of documents released are correspondences between Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad and two of Singapore's former prime ministers, Mr. Lee Kuan Yew and Mr. Goh Chok Tong.

Also made public are extracts of the record of the meeting between Prime Minister Dato' Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and Mr. Goh Chok Tong in Kuala Lumpur in March 2005.

The contents of these documents contain three key facts:

1. Discussions with Singapore on the airspace issue are not new and were not mooted by the current Government under Prime Minister Dato' Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad himself included this issue as a trade-off and as part of the package of issues to be resolved with Singapore during negotiations from 1998 to 2002. This is evident from Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad's letter to Senior Minister Mr. Lee Kuan Yew on March 4 2002. This same issue was raised by Senior Minister Mr. Goh Chok Tong during a meeting with Abdullah on March 1 2005. This fact nullifies the suggestion by Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad that it was the present administration that offered RSAF jets use of Malaysian airspace.

2. The sale of sand to Singapore was raised by the Republic during a meeting between Prime Minister Dato' Seri Abdullah Badawi and Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong on March 1 2005. This nullifies argument that the Government put the issue on sand on the negotiating table.

3. Comprehensive advice by the Attorney General's Chambers showed that Malaysia should not proceed to build a bridge unilaterally without complying with our legal obligations. In particular, Malaysia had obligations under the Johor-Singapore water agreements 1961 and 1962, the Wayleave Agreements and the Separation Agreement 1965.

The main obstacle was that the construction of the crooked bridge will involve the demolition of the Malaysian side of the Johor Causeway. The said demolition would directly affect the water pipeline located inside the Johor Causeway and water pipelines straddling the Johor Causeway in which the ownership thereof vests with the Public Utilities Board of Singapore.

The Attorney General's Chambers also stated that under the 1961 and 1962 Johor-Singapore Water Agreements, "Malaysia is required to obtain approval of PUB in relation to the alteration of water pipelines as a result of the construction of a full straight bridge or a scenic half bridge."

The 1961 and 1962 Johor-Singapore Water Agreements are guaranteed under the 1965 Separation Agreement. The water pipelines located inside the Johor Causeway is governed by the 1961 Johor Singapore Water Agreement. Therefore, the provisions of the WayleaveAgreements which is applicable to the water pipelines straddling along the Johor Causeway is not applicable to the water pipeline located inside the Johor Causeway. These facts nullify the allegation that the water pipeline located inside the Johor Causeway could be relocated unilaterally after giving six months notice to Singapore.

Taking into consideration these facts, the present Government had to make a firm decision to reject Singapore's quid-pro-quo proposal on sand and airspace as it would have compromised Malaysia's national sovereignty. It had to make the political decision to abort the bridge project as this was consistent with the sentiment of Malaysians and the interest of Malaysia.

In conclusion, the issue boils down to one simple fact - Malaysia wanted the bridge, and Singapore did not want it.

The full straight bridge that was proposed by Malaysia would have been a symbol of friendship and would have benefited both countries. Nevertheless, the responsibility for achieving this aim does not lie with Malaysia only.

Note: Please refer to Appendix A for further information.

Appendix A: (is SAME as the TOP Part)

Update:July 14, 2006 21:35 PM
Declassified Documents Not For Circulation, Says Samsudin
PUTRAJAYA, July 14 (Bernama) -- The confidential documents declassified by the government to explain its decision to abort the "scenic" bridge project are not meant for circulation to the public, Chief Secretary to the Government Tan Sri Samsudin Osman said Friday.

He said that usually when a document is declassified it would mean that it is not categorised as secret anymore and "if it is to be in the public domain, then I guess it will be accessible to people".

"But it will not mean that we will be circulating the Cabinet minutes all over the place, no way. That's not the way it is going to be, but information from it can be contained in any document that states it," he told reporters after presenting a cheque for RM5,000 from the Putrajaya Corporation to Mercy Malaysia representative Ir Imran Mahzan for victims of the recent earthquake in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Samsudin had earlier received pledges of donation from sponsors for the Putrajaya Treasure Hunt 2006 that will be held on July 23.

Earlier Friday, the Prime Minister's Department said in a statement that among the package of documents declassified are correspondence between former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad and two former Singapore prime ministers, Lee Kuan Yew and Goh Chok Tong, and extracts of the record of the meeting between Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and Goh in Kuala Lumpur in March last year.

The government had decided to declassify relevant confidential documents to reply to the questions posed by Dr Mahathir with regard to several issues, including the aborted "scenic" bridge to replace the Malaysian side of the Johor Causeway, the issuance of Approved Permits for car imports, the non-renewal of Tengku Tan Sri Mahaleel Tengku Ariff's contract as Proton chief executive, and the sale of motorcycle maker MV Agusta SpA for one euro.

-- BERNAMA

see also earlier posting: dated 30th June, which is quite similar to this new statement which has declassified documents
Datuk Syed Hamid : Dr Mahathir’s BELIEFS on SAND AIRSPACE are UNTRUTHS; Datuk Seri Hisham: Dr Mahathir’s friends TAKING ADVANTAGE

ZIDANE Apologized; MATERAZZI Denied RACIST Comment or Aiming ABUSE Zidane's MOTHER; TREZEGUET shoulders BLAME-his crucial PENALTY MISS


David Trezeguet just before the missed penalty shot; 4.37am Malaysian time

The ball was shot a bit too high and bounced off the post

France striker David Trezeguet says he will shoulder the blame for his crucial penalty miss in the World Cup final defeat by Italy
Trezeguet was the only man to miss a spot-kick in the shootout as Italy won 5-3, with the striker's effort coming back off the crossbar with Gianluigi Buffon diving the wrong way.
The duo currently play together at Juventus, but Trezeguet has denied that that was a factor in his miss.
He said: "It's true that I know Buffon very well, but I didn't change my style of striking the ball because of that.
"I didn't think I hit the ball badly. I think it's important that one takes responsibility for their acts and I walk with my head held up high.
"We have to accept defeat, look ahead, this is part of football.
"We did dominate and I don't think we were inferior to Italy.
"Unfortunately, we weren't able to score and the game was decided on penalties. We knew then that it could go either way


No regrets from Zidane; Thursday Jul 13 2006 07:37
France legend Zinedine Zidane has apologised for headbutting Italy defender Marco Materazzi in the World Cup final, but says that he does not regret his actions.
Zidane spoke on French television about his assault on Materazzi, which led to a red card in the final match of his illustrious career, with the Azzurri going on to clinch World Cup glory after a penalty shootout.


Zidane said: "It was inexcusable. I apologise, but I can't regret what I did because it would mean that he was right to say all that.
"It was seen by two or three billion people on television and millions and millions of children were watching.
"It was an inexcusable gesture and to them, and the people in education whose job it is to show children what they should and shouldn't do, I want to apologise.
"We always talk about the reaction and obviously it must be punished. But if there is no provocation, there is no need to react.
"Above all it was a very serious provocation. It was an inexcusable gesture but the real culprit is the person who provoked it.
"Do you imagine that in a World Cup final like that with just ten minutes to go to the end of my career, I am going to do something like that because it gives me pleasure?"
Of the nature of what Materazzi had said to him, Zidane added: "You hear them once and you try to move away, but then you hear them twice and then a third time.
"I am a man and some words are harder to hear than actions. I would rather have taken a blow to the face than hear that."
After ending his career with a red card in extra time of the World Cup final, France’s Zinedine Zidane was named the Golden Ball award winner, given to the most outstanding player of the tournament. Zidane edged out Italian captain Fabio Cannavaro in voting decided by media members. It is the third time in a row that a player from the losing side in the championship team won the award.

Zidane was great at times in this tournament but frankly I don’t think enough tohis play was good merit him winning the award. Perhaps members of the media saw it as an opportunity to honor a player who has been great throughout the years, but I think they made the wrong choice. I would have gone with Cannavaro.
The other awards from the 2006 World Cup:
Golden Shoe (top scorer): Miroslav Klose (Germany)
Most Entertaining Team: Portugal
Best Goalkeeper: Gianluigi Buffon (Italy)
Best Young Player: Lukas Podolski (Germany)
Team Fair Play Award: Spain and Brazil

Meanwhile Italy defender Marco Materazzi has again denied making any racist comment or aiming abuse at Zinedine Zidane's mother before being headbutted by the Frenchman in the World Cup final.
Zidane has broken his silence to level allegations of serious abuse against Materazzi, but the Azzurri stopper says his conscience is clear.
He said: "I didn't mention anything about religion, politics or racism.
"I didn't insult his mother. I lost my mother when I was 15 years old and still get emotional when I talk about it.
"Naturally, I didn't know that his mother was in hospital but I wish her all the best. Zidane is my hero and I have always admired him a lot."
Materazzi had earlier told Gazetta dello Sport: "I held his shirt for a few seconds only, then he turned to me and talked to me, jeering.
"He looked at me with a huge arrogance and said 'if you really want my shirt I'll give it to you afterwards'. I replied with an insult, that's true.
"It was one of those insults you're told dozens of times and that you often let fall on a pitch.
"I did not call him a terrorist. I did not bring up Zidane's mother, for me a mother is sacred."
Meanwhile, FIFA president Sepp Blatter has warned that Zidane could be stripped of the Golden Ball award as the World Cup's best player, saying: "The FIFA executive committee has the responsibility of intervening when it is a matter of conduct which goes against the ethics of the sport.
"That is why I gave the orders to our disciplinary commission to investigate what happened.
"To see him, Zidane, acting like that leaves me vexed, both for himself and for all sense of fair play."

Wednesday, July 12, 2006

SPEEDY GONZALES in MALAYSIAN CABINET: No 1- SAMY VELLU-RM17,460 (143); Fong Chan Onn - RM15,230 (115); Syed Hamid Albar –RM15,200 (121)






No 17 - Chan Kong Choy, Transport Minister
Graphics Courtesy Malaysiakini

When Malaysiakini had the exclusive exposure (see above) on 10th Jul 2006; 18 ministers were identified with unpaid summons, many people with the ministers' car registration numbers did their own checking and alerted them that "many more are involved". So many are not "cleaned"

Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu led the pack of defaulters. There is confusion on the 2nd spot; Datuk Seri Fong has more fines than Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Albar who has more summons on his name. All of them will denied they were actually driving their cars, it must be the Datins, the sons or daughters; but all will have no choice but to pay up to follow the leadership by examples principle.

From the cabinet list and the majority of people with summons, it seems every tom dick and harry is overspeeding (assuming it is the major offence). What the police should do now is to actually analyze where most of the summons come from and at what speed they were caught and at which stretch of roads. They must utilize the ICT experts and determine what should be the appropriate speed limit for that stretch of road.

The speed limits are very outdated in a great number of places and are essentially “speed traps zone” for all motorists. When the roads are widened to accommodate speedier movement of traffic, speed limits should be adjusted to reflect on the better road conditions.
What is outdated is the Road Ordinance which should undergo a detailed study and the appropriate clauses be amended.

The following is Bernama account which is bare
Najib Pledges To Settle Summonses, Wants Ministers To Do The Same
PUTRAJAYA, July 11 (Bernama) -- Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak said Tuesday he would settle his outstanding traffic summonses and urged fellow ministers slapped with fines for traffic offences to pay up.

Explaining how he ended up being on the list of federal ministers with unpaid summonses for traffic violations, the Deputy Prime Minister said: "As you know, I don't drive the cars, others drive." "So, I don't know the car had been summoned and the people responsible didn't tell me," he said of the list put up on a website showing him at the sixth spot with 67 summonses since March 1999 amounting to RM7,820 in total compounds after reduction.

Topping the list is Works Minister Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu followed by Human Resources Minister Datuk Seri Dr Fong Chan Onn, Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Albar, Entrepreneur and Cooperative Development Minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin and Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Mohamad Nazri Abdul Aziz.

Queried about the list at a press conference after chairing a meeting on jobless graduates here, Najib said: "Many of these are personal cars driven by others I'm not aware of. Whoever's name is on the list, we'll take action to settle the summonses. We'll settle this matter."

The NST account gave more details of the total amount and the number of summons.
Najib to settle RM7,820 in traffic fines; 12 Jul 2006
PUTRAJAYA: Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has to pay RM7,820 to settle summonses for traffic offences by a car under his name.

"I’ll settle it. But it wasn’t me driving the car," he said in a light-hearted tone to reporters who raised the issue with him yesterday.

Najib is number five on an Internet news daily site of ministers who have not paid fines for speeding offences.

The list was published online yesterday, with Najib having 67 unpaid summonses, the oldest one on March 27, 1999 and the most recently issued summons on April 16, this year.

"Yes, I know all about it, I know I’m number five on the list," Najib said. He was speaking at a Press conference after chairing a meeting by the special committee on unemployed graduates.

He said the summonses were issued on his personal car which was driven by other people.
"I didn’t know my car was summoned, whoever was driving also neglected to tell me. But we will settle it," he said.

On the same list, Works Minister Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu was number one with the highest number of unpaid summonses – 143 with RM17,460 in fines after reductions.

Second is Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Albar, who owes RM15,200 for 121 unpaid summonses over the past seven years.

He is followed by Human Resources Minister Datuk Seri Dr Fong Chan Onn with 115 summonses and RM15,230 in fines.

Fourth was Entrepreneur and Co-operative Development Minister Datuk Mohamed Khaled Nordin, who owes RM12,190 for 93 summonses.

.. and here are the comments extrated from readers in Malaysiakini
Malaysian Voter: Your report of “elite speedsters” including cabinet ministers - it’s interesting that it included the transport minister who has preached road safety - with unpaid fines of traffic offences is an inescapable fact that they did not put to practice what they had publicly preached. Certain ministers who lamented about our high accident rates are also implicated in the speeding offences.

It is indeed an “eye-opener” which reflects our quality of political leadership and the double standard where top leaders are exempted from the deadline imposed by the traffic police in the payment of fines. No wonder, the saying that Malaysians are taking comedians seriously and politicians as a joke.

It is a known fact from their former drivers that they normally flicked their cars’ head-lamps lights as they approached an “anti-speeding operation” indicating their VIP status to avoid being summoned. Or the drivers switched on their emergency lights as they sped beyond the authorised speed limits, after all, the cars carried “special passengers”. It is indeed a great disappointment but kudos to our traffic police for their integrity and transparency.

Meng: I do not understand why ministers get a discount for their speeding fines. If anything, the ministers should be fined twice the amount because they should set an example on obeying the law. I really deplore this type of preferential treatment and find it disgusting that this government asks us to change our lifestyle, to be thrifty, to eat less sugar, to use less energy, to pay our traffic summonses, etc. Yet our own BN leaders have more traffic summonses then two hands put together, and they have no warrant of arrests? This is selective persecution.
David Yee: Please continue to highlight this issue until they pay up, and in particular Samy Vellu. In Australia, the ministers will have to probably resign.
*************************
Update: Jul 13 06
http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/53812

Why ministers' licences not revoked?; Bede Hong Jul 13, 06 11:53am

The revelation that a majority of ministers in the cabinet have accumulated nearly 1,000 unpaid summonses raises questions as to how the road taxes for their vehicles could be renewed each year.

According to an official at the Road Transportation Department (JPJ), owners of vehicles with outstanding traffic fines cannot renew their road taxes until payments have been made.

It is illegal for motorists to use a vehicle without a current road tax, which must be renewed annually.

When renewing road taxes, information on a road user's unpaid summonses would show in the computer network which is directly linked to the JPJ's mainframe computer.

Motorists are then told to clear their unpaid summons before they can renew their vehicle's road tax.

This is, of course, in theory. The reality is quite different, said a motoring expert, who declined to be named.

He said there seem to be some bureaucratic glitches between the police and the JPJ.

"Summonses information must first get to JPJ," he said.

"If the police does not send over the information, then a motorist would not have a record. That is why sometimes you could renew your road tax even when you have a backlog of several summonses from years ago. It's because the information has not reached JPJ yet."

However, the expert said that if a car owner is unlucky enough to be issued a traffic summons by a JPJ officer, it is a "guarantee" that the owner would be unable to renew the road tax of the vehicle if the owner does not pay up. Summonses are usually issued by the police, as JPJ has less manpower.

Demerit points

Another question, although not related to road tax renewal, was why the driving licences of the politicians, or their drivers', were not suspended after having committed dozens of traffic offences.

The JPJ has a road safety demerit system called Kejara. It is a point demerit system whereby if a motorist exceeds 15 points, the user's drivers licence could be suspended for six months.

Ensuing offences would result in further suspension and finally a permanent cancellation of the drivers licence.

Speeding, the most common offence committed by the ministers, carries demerit points of between 6 and 15 points, depending on the severity of each offence.

"However, for the demerit system to work, police officers would have to fill out forms. It's a complicated system, which of course does not work because you don't see any of the ministers' licences suspended or revoked," said the motoring expert.

Double standards

He also criticised several ministers, including Deputy Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, who claimed that they were not driving their cars when the traffic offences were committed.

"If you look closely at the bottom of the traffic summons, it is stated that if you are not the driver of a vehicle, but someone else was driving your vehicle, then you can fill out the form and direct the police's attention to that particular person. The police would then reissue the summons.

"We can't know for sure whether a minister was behind a wheel or not. But you can't expect people to believe that you had no knowledge of the traffic offences committed in vehicles under their names.

"The only scenario I can imagine is that their aides could be hiding the summonses from them, but it's very unusual as the summonses were not paid for up to seven years," he said.

On why the ministers have been getting away with it for so long, the expert felt it was due to a mix of procrastination, inefficiency and a fear of penalising high-profile politicians.

"The summons are issued to high-profile car owners. You know where their offices are. The police cannot claim that these people cannot be traced.

"They can't say we cannot find them... even if that is the case, you can send a formal notice to their office," he said.

The police said more than RM2.82 billion remain uncollected in traffic summonses issued between 2001 and 2004 to some 9.4 million drivers nationwide.

Malaysiakini has sent a request to the traffic police for an interview last week and has yet to hear from them.

Full list of cabinet members and their unpaid fines
http://www.malaysiakini.com/pages/ctf2/


http://www.malaysiakini.com/letters/53834
and comments in a letter
LETTERS: VIP traffic summonses: Why no arrest warrants?
Sulaiman Rejab Jul 13, 06 4:02pm

I refer to your exclusive report 18 more ministers among 'elite' speedsters. http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/53643

If one says that selected prosecution does not take place in Malaysia, please laugh. Ministers are getting away with unpaid traffic summonses while the ordinary man is being dragged to the lock-up in the wee hours of the morning.

Inspector-General of Police Mohd Bakri Omar must explain the police's failure to arrest the prime minister, the deputy prime minister and other cabinet ministers for not paying their traffic summonses, some dating back to late 1990s.

Why the double standard? When the ordinary man, who surely earns much less than these ministers, fails to pay his or her summonses, the police take great pains to go to court and obtain warrants of arrest.

If the IGP cannot give a satisfactory answer as to why there are no warrants of arrest against these ministers, who in their hypocritical political speeches and Hari Raya messages advice motorists to drive slowly and carefully, then he should obviously resign for failing in his duties.

No doubt that in most cases, it is the ministers' drivers who commit the traffic offence, but while ferrying whom?

The deputy prime minister has collected summonses dating back to 1999 and owes the government about RM8,000. And guess what? No warrant of arrest. Works Minister S Samy Vellu, with 143 unpaid summonses, still owes the government RM17,460.

He is followed by Foreign Affairs Minister Syed Hamid Albar, who has racked up 121 unpaid summonses totaling RM15,200 over the past seven years.

Close on his heels is Human Resources Minister Dr Fong Chan Onn, with a debt of RM15,230 from 115 summonses issued from May 21, 2001 up to April this year.

Entrepreneur and Co-operative Development Minister Mohamed Khaled Nordin is said to owe RM12,190 from 93 summonses over a period of seven years.

Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi had 11 summons, Women, Family and Community Development Minister Sharizat Abdul Jalil had 23 and International Trade and Industry Minister Rafidah Aziz had 10. Youth and Sports Minister Azalina Othman had 28 recorded against her name.
The Minister of Transport (also has 14 summons
under his name
) speaking to newsmen

Update 13th July 06
No special treatment for ministers: Chan
Giam Say Khoon Updated: 08:45PM Thu, 13 Jul 2006
PUTRAJAYA: There is no special treatment for ministers who, like ordinary citizens, must pay up their traffic fines.

Transport Minister Datuk Seri Chan Kong Choy said today (July 13, 2006) ministers will not be spared simply because they are ministers.

However, he said he was told that most of the time, the car registered under the minister's name is not driven by the minister but his driver.

"Anyway, this is not an excuse for them not to pay their outstanding summonses," he told reporters after announcing a road safety mobile exhibition.

"The ministers should also advice their drivers to drive safely and follow strictly the traffic rules and regulations."

Chan said that during the cabinet meeting on Wednesday (July 12, 2006), the ministers discussed the matter and (decided) that those booked must pay up. According to recent news reports, several ministers chalked up high outstanding traffic fines.

NIGHTMARE - ILLEGAL RACE Police OPERATION on Saturday morning; 400 M’sian Cars IMPOUNDED; 40 SUMMONS (@RM300); MASSIVE Jams 2nd Link

Above: Helicopters were used in the Operation to check on escaping vehicles

Below:
The massive jam in queuing up for the
Road Block on the road to 2nd Link


In the wake of police operation in the wee hours of Saturday which saw an estimated 600 people and 400 cars being rounded up for illegal racing, PLUS Expressways Bhd, operator of the Second Link Highway, has issued a stern warning that such activities will not be allowed anymore.

The residents of Gelang Patah, located about five kilometres from the expressway, have complained about the noise caused by the weekend illegal racing which has been going on for the past five or six months.

They said luxury cars such as Mercedes Benz, Porsche and Mitsubishi with modified engines were used in the races, defined as drag racing by enthusiasts where a straight stretch of the highway, usually a kilometre long, is used.

On Saturday night, police moved in with a helicopter, 10 patrol cars and 140 men on motorcycles and arrested 600 people, including spectators. A total of 400 cars and 150 motorcycles were also impounded.

GOOD NEWS for Drag Racing
Maybe the situation (illegal racing) has gone out of hand. We meant well when we organised the Second Link Drag Challenge three months ago to give drag racing enthusiasts a chance to try out their favourite sport.

"And we did it under close supervision from the authorities," added Khalilah.

But there is an alternative for those who still want to do drag racing.

According to Khalilah Mohamed Talha, PLUS Expressways Bhd’s assistant general manager, Corporate Communications, told Bernama Monday, "a 1km permanent drag racing track at the Action Sports Adventure Paradise (Asap) in nearby Nusajaya was almost ready for use"

The developer, UEM Land Bhd, had been conducting tests on the track and it should be open to the public soon, she added.

And for those returning home to Singapore it ws indeed a nightmare to be caught in the police dragnet. Apparently, they noted down almost all the registration numbers of those involved (including spectators) and video taped the illegal race and you can imagine how much time it took for them to one by one verify the vehicles involved during the Roadblock. So for many, it was a 6 hours or more ordeal and frustration. Read the report from S'pore's "ELECTRIC NEWS" below:-
*************************************************

..and here is the NST account on Illegal Second Link race: RM300 fine for offenders
11 Jul 2006 Chuah Bee Kim

JOHOR BARU: Those involved in the illegal race at the Second Link over the weekend have been slapped with a RM300 compound fine each.

Police issued 40 summonses, amounting to RM12,000, to owners of the vehicles used in the race. They included nine motorcyclists, whose vehicles were seized during the big-scale operation to nab illegal racers.

However, only 38 owners have claimed their vehicles. In all, 400 Malaysian-registered cars were impounded at the Johor Baru North police station following the operation. Among the cars at the police station were a Porsche and a BMW.

The car owners were fined for offences such as illegal modifications, fancy licence plates and glass tints, which were not approved by the Road Transport Department.

Johor Baru North traffic police chief Inspector Bakri Zainal Abidin said an additional RM8,140 was collected from 62 previous summonses issued to the car owners.

Of the 600 drivers detained, 50 were sent for drug tests and one tested positive for heroin.

The operation involved a helicopter, 140 policemen on motorcycles and 10 police cars at the access road leading to the Second Link bridge in Gelang Patah.

Bakri also warned that spectators would also be hauled up if they were caught at illegal races.

"We noticed there were students among the crowd who had lined up to cheer the motorcycles and cars, but we decided to let them off with a warning this time."

As for tracing the organiser of the race, Bakri said the case was still being investigated.

During the race, the cars and motorcycles sped along the three-kilometre stretch with hundreds of spectators cheering them on.

The residents of Gelang Patah had been complaining for the past three months about the noise from the modified engines and the crowd. The six-lane road is turned into an illegal racing circuit every weekend.

and here is the perspective account from the Singapore end complaining about


Detained at road block for hours, S'porean claims M'sian police told her:

Need the loo? Do it in bushes; by Zubaidah Nazeer
July 11, 2006

HUNDREDS of cars were stopped on the highway by the Malaysian police early yesterday morning. They were held up for hours as helicopters swooped in and documents were confiscated.

Travellers, including many Singaporeans, had to go without water and food. Even toilet breaks proved to be difficult. Later, a long line of cars was escorted to a police station, where there was more waiting.

It was mid-morning before some of the Singaporeans got back. The road block was near Gelang Patah on the Second Link highway in Johor, and one of those held up said she heard the police mention illegal racing.

Ms Siti (not her real name), a customer service officer, said she was with nine friends. They had driven from
Singapore to Pasir Gudang in six cars. There, Ms Siti, 25, claims they watched a legal car race at 11pm on Saturday. Around 1.45am, the group left.

They headed to the Second Link to meet a friend who was waiting for them at the petrol station near the Malaysian checkpoint. They planned to go for supper after that.

The cars - all travelling one behind the other on the left lane at about 100kmh - passed a highway toll booth near Gelang Patah.

NIGHTMARE

Then, as they neared the road leading to the Second Link, they were stopped by the police. Ms Siti noticed more cars in front. After about 20 minutes, they were waved to move on. Less than five minutes later, about 2km away, they noticed a jam. This is where their nightmare began.

Said Ms Siti: 'We saw something like 300 cars. We thought it was strange that there were so many cars at this time of the night.' About 50 of these cars had
Singapore plates, she and her friends estimated. She saw three patrol cars and more police officers stopping cars.

Her friend, Kevin, 26 (who also did not want his full name revealed), claimed: 'I asked the police officers what's going on and he just said, 'Shut up and wait'.'

The Subaru WRX driver, who was leading the group, was then asked to surrender his passport, identity card and driver's licence. Said another member of the group, Mr Syamsul Mohd, 33, a civil servant: 'I was told to give my passport, but my friend, who was also in my car, was not asked for any documents.'

Added Ms Siti: 'The police officers were speaking in Malay and told us we had been caught for illegal racing.' Said Mr Kevin: 'It was a massive jam. I saw uncles and aunties, some in family saloon cars, stuck in the roadblock.' The cars were inching forward and were being guided to U-turn on to the other side of the road to form two lines - one for Singapore-registered cars and the other for Malaysian ones.

Said Ms Siti: 'I saw two helicopters circling. Then one of them somehow landed on the road.
'I saw people coming out of their cars to take pictures and videotape the whole thing.'

She also spotted photographers, possibly from the media. They were stuck there for nearly three hours. Said Mr Syamsul: 'It was getting irritating. We did not know why we were
targeted and stopped.'

Ms Siti claimed: 'I wanted to go to the toilet, so I told a police officerto let us off, but he just told me to do it in the bushes like how the men do. She also saw motorcyclists with big bikes stopped.

Just before
5am, they were instructed to follow each other in a line. A Malaysian police car was leading the line with another one at the end. They arrived at Skudai Police Station and were told to park in the compound. There were about 200 cars there, they estimated.

POLICE ASKED FOR CAR KEYS

Said Mr Kevin: 'The officers asked me for my car keys and said they wanted to hold my car to check for illegal modifications. They told me I can come back on Tuesday. 'I asked why they need it and they accused me of challenging them. Then one officer told me if I wanted to challenge him, challenge him in court.'

He added: 'I just kept quiet because I did not want to anger them anymore... But I was upset.'
He tried calling numbers back home, and even the Singapore High Commission in
Kuala Lumpur, but he couldn't get anyone.

Said Mr Syamsul: 'No one attended to us. The officers looked busy and none of us dared to question them.' Five hours into their ordeal and none of them had any food or water.

So Mr Kevin walked a kilometre to the nearest petrol station as shops in nearby Skudai Parade had not opened yet, to get some pastries and water for himself and his friends.

Mr Syamsul claimed: 'When we asked to go to the toilet, the officers told us to join a queue for two cubicles for hundreds of us.' Around
9am, names were called out one at a time. Those called were given back their documents and told they could drive off.

Mr Syamsul recalled the officers going through a handwritten list of car numbers and just telling him he could go off, with no explanation. At first, the police officers told Mr Kevin he could not leave.

Said Ms Siti: 'We demanded to know why and what proof they had. We kept demanding until the officers talked among themselves and, just like that, they released him.'

By the time they made their way back to
Singapore, Ms Siti was late for her 9 am shift at work and called in sick.

Mr Kevin, who runs his own logistics business, had to cancel an appointment in the morning, and his girlfriend, who was with him, rushed to work at
11am. When The New Paper contacted the Skudai police station, a spokesman confirmed that they had a roadblock operation early yesterday morning. But she declined to give more details.
____

Tuesday, July 11, 2006

MORE Pics - HIGH DRAMA RM100,000 ROBBERY Failed - Setapak ; TWO Killed - Victim Killed, SUSPECT Shot TWICE, then Killed Himself.

Above: The robbery scene, in front of Sri Pelangi condominium

Below: The press photographers and the curious crowds



Two Men Killed And A Cop Injured In Attempted Robbery KUALA LUMPUR, July 11 2006, -- High drama unfolded at Jalan Genting Klang near Setapak Tuesday during a robbery attempt which left two men dead and a policeman injured.
The victim who resisted and got shot

Sentul OCPD ACP Mohamed Rodzi Ismail said the incident occurred at 10.30am after Chin Kim Kian, 26, and a friend parked their car at the parking lot in front of a row of shops next to the Sri Pelangi condominium.


The suspect got shot twice and then killed himself with his own gun

They were to deposit RM100,000 in the PBB bank across the road when the suspects, Liew Wan Fu, 26, who was riding pillion on a motorcycle, and an unidentified accomplice approached them.
"Liew cornered Chin and his friend at gunpoint and forced them to hand over the money. The victim probably resisted and was subsequently shot in the chest, killing him instantly," he told reporters at the scene.

He said three policemen who were patrolling the area saw the incident just as the suspect was about to flee.
"One policeman fired two shots at the suspect, the first hitting him in the waist. The suspect fell on the second shot which hit him in the chest. "However, as the policeman were about to approach him, the suspect aimed his .38mm at his own head and fired," Mohamed Rodzi said. He said that although the suspect was wearing a helmet, the close range at which the shot was fired caused the bullet to penetrate the suspect's helmet and head and hit the policeman on his left leg.

He said the 22-year-old constable, Abdi Abdul Mahad, from the Setapak police station was sent to the Kuala Lumpur Hospital for his injury.
However, the suspect's accomplice managed to flee in the commotion, while Chin's friend was unharmed. Police managed to recover the RM100,000, he said. Mohamed Rodzi said checks revealed that the suspect, who lived in Jalan Kuchai Lama, was wanted for a murder case last year, and it was learnt that both the victim and his friend worked in a mobile phone shop in Taman Danau Kota here.

Update..
...and here is the STAR 's report on 12th Jul
Cornered gunman then shoots himself in the head; BY KULDEEP S. JESSY

KUALA LUMPUR: An armed robber shot dead a cellular phone shop employee after grabbing a bag containing RM100,000 from him and later killed himself when policemen cornered him and a shootout ensued.
The robber, 26, took two shots to the chest and waist before shooting himself in the head. The bullet from the robber’s gun pierced through his helmet and lodged into a policeman’s left leg in the 10.30am incident at Jalan Genting Kelang, Setapak.
Witnesses said the robber, who was shot in the chest and waist, was lying on the ground and clutching the moneybag when he lifted his gun to shoot himself.
The cellular phone shop employee was identified as Chin Kim Kian, 23, from Desa Country Homes in Rawang.
Sentul OCPD Asst Comm Mohd Rodzi Ismail later identified the dead robber as Liew Wan Fu, 26, from Jalan Kuchai Lama who was wanted by police for a murder-cum-robbery in 2005.
The injured police constable, Abdi Abdul Mahad, 24, from the Setapak police station is being treated at Kuala Lumpur Hospital and is in stable condition.
The drama unfolded at about 10.30am when two employees of the phone shop were walking towards a nearby bank to deposit RM100,000.
The workers had parked their car opposite the bank and were standing on the road shoulder when two men on a motorcycle pulled up near them.
The pillion rider snatched the bag containing the RM100,000 and ran off on foot when Chin gave chase and managed to catch up with the robber.
During the scuffle that ensued, the robber whipped out a revolver and shot Chin dead.
Three policemen on their rounds witnessed the incident and immediately cordoned off the area.
One of them took aim at the armed robber who was about to hop onto his accomplice’s motorcycle. Two of the shots hit the robber.
The accomplice, who was riding a Honda EX-5, sped off on seeing his comrade fall.

MORE Pics - ROBBERY at VICE PRESIDENT Bungalow Home in Ampang; Woman shot in getaway GEN 2 Car and SPANAIRD BOYFRIEND detained within 10 mins

The rented Gen-2 car came to a halt after being shot at

Police personnel inspecting the car and tacking the bulet holes

A woman was shot in the knee when their getaway Gen 2 car tried to ram against the police patrol vehicle within 10 minutes of breaking into the bungalow house of a senior vice president of a stock broking firm in Taman Sri Ukay in Ampang on Monday.

The marked bullet holes; the police are experts and are
trained to shoot "below" the vehicle to disable it


Ampang OCPD said that they had to fire four shots at the criminal’s car while trying to escape and ramming into a patrol car. The vehicle despite being shot at speeded up and changed position but finally came to a halt at Lorong 7A with a flat tire.

The cause of the car coming to a stop - flat tyre caused by the police sharp shooters

The Spaniard fled the scene on foot leaving his injured girlfriend in the car. He was arrested minutes latter.
Police recovered the stolen goods which a laptop, a camera and jewelry from the car and other break in tools. Initial investigation showed that the Gen-2 was rented from another foreigner.

The recoverd stolen goos, camera (left), Ac/DC
adapter, Laptop and jewelry below



The folowing more detailed account from today's STAR explained why the COPS were there witrhin minutes.

STAR, Tues Jul 11; Cops nab robber couple; By KULDEEP S. JESSY

KUALA LUMPUR: A couple fleeing from police after breaking into a bank executive’s home at Taman Seri Ukay, Hulu Klang, here was arrested following a high-speed car chase.

The drama unfolded when the executive’s mother heard someone cutting the grille at the back of the house.

She immediately contacted her son, who then called the Ampang police.

Ampang Jaya OCPD Asst Comm Azri Ahmad said upon seeing a patrol car approaching the house, the couple got into their getaway car and fled the scene.

STOLEN GOODS: Policemen recording the items found in the couple's car believed to have been stolen from the house in Taman Seri Ukay, Hulu Klang Monday.
“At first, the woman, in her 30s, was driving. However, several minutes later the man, in his 20s, took over the wheel as the police car was catching up with them,” he said.

“One of the two policemen in the patrol car fired four shots to the left side of the couple’s car after the man drove it in a dangerous manner causing it to brush against the patrol car.

“One of the shots hit the woman’s right leg while another hit one of the tyres,” he said, adding that the driver of the getaway car had refused to heed warnings to stop.

ACP Azri said the man claiming to be a Colombian and the woman, reportedly a Malaysian, were finally arrested when the man stopped the car.

He said police managed to recover a laptop computer, a digital camera and several pieces of jewellery believed to have been taken from the executive’s house.

The owner of the house, who declined to be identified, said he had told his mother to lock herself in a room.

The assistant to a deputy president of a bank said he contacted the Ampang police before rushing home.

Luckily the robbers did not know that my mother was in the house,” he said, adding that yesterday’s incident was the second time that robbers had broken into his home in as many years.

Monday, July 10, 2006

MORE Pics –SIX Family members CHEATED DEATH – KANCIL CAR lost Control flew into a RAVINE; FATHER & SON suffered SERIOUS INJURIES

The car after being pulled out and inspected by traffic police

The aftermath of the Kancil after the impact on the ravine,
a total loss perhaps for insurance, but parts can still be cannibalise.


SIX family members cheated death when the car they were traveling plunged into a ravine at 11km in Wang Klin in PERLIS on Saturday, 8th Jul 2006. Two were seriously injured with head, hand and leg injuries. The injured (sitting in the front) were the driver (in the early twenties) and his father 61. They were warded in the Tuanku Fauziah hospital in Kangar. The Police DSP said the driver loss control of the car before plunging into the ravine.

The 32 year old wife and the two children and another relative (sitting at the back) sustained light injuries. They were on their way to open a stall in the day market when the accident occurred at about 8.30 am in the morning.


Family members who escaped salvaing the belongings from the ravine floor

Once again this matchbox car is inherently dangerous and unstable to move around at higher speed and should be confined within a housing estate or a kampong. But for a car, distance is no limit when started.

The Kancil after a wash with 'sky water'


See ROBBERY at TMN SRI UKAY, WOMAN SHOT, SPANAIRD ARRESTED

9 MORE Pics – WORLD CUP 2006 – ITALY 5 France 3 PENALTY Kicks; 1 – 1 at Full Time; 7 min Penalty Goal by Zidaine Equalized at 19 min by Mazzerati


The jubilant Italian Captain Fabio Cannavaro hosting up the most coveted Football Cup

and the winning Italian Squad posing with the Cup



It is OVER the World Cup 2006 for Football. It was 1-1 Full time and ITALIANS won by penalty kicks 5-3 when France Trezeguet's shot hit the post and bouncing out,

Zidaine put the French ahead in the 7 min and Mazzeratie equalized at 19 min and there were no goals till end of extra time


Above: Zidane penaly shot into the Italian Goal at the 7 min

Below: The Italian's Jubilation after the 19 min Equalizer


Below:The clinging Penaly that gave the Italians 5 - 3 win over the French team


Below:The joy and jubilation immediately the
win was secured at about 4.40 am M'sian time






and read this Reuter's detailed account via Bernama; July 10, 2006 09:51 AM
Italy win fourth World Cup after shootout; Mitch Phillips

BERLIN, July 10 (Reuters) - Italy won the World Cup for the fourth time on Sunday when they beat France 5-3 on penalties after the teams finished level at 1-1 in a dramatic final that saw French captain Zinedine Zidane sent off in extra time.

After David Trezeguet hit the bar with his spot kick the Italians kept their nerve to end their penalties curse with fullback Fabio Grosso converting the fifth and decisive kick.

Zidane, who opened the scoring with a penalty after seven minutes, was sent off nine minutes from the end of extra time for a head butt into the chest of Marco Materazzi, who had equalised for Italy with a 19th-minute header.

It was certainly not the way Zidane would have wanted to end his glorious career as he became only the fourth player to be sent off in a World Cup final but the Italians did not care.

Instead, it was Italy captain Fabio Cannavaro, exemplary again in his 100th international, who lifted the trophy to add to the Azzurri's successes of 1934, 1938 and 1982.

They have become the second most successful team in World Cup history after Brazil, who have won it five times.

"I have to say thanks to the players," said Italy coach Marcello Lippi. "This is the most satisfying moment of my life.

"The players have unlimited heart, character and personality," he added. "We are very happy."

It had looked good for France early on and for long periods of the game when they looked the more creative side.

Their penalty came after Florent Malouda drove into the box and was felled by a clumsy challenge from Materazzi.

NONCHALANT CHIP

Zidane opted to nonchalantly chip his spot kick above the diving Gianluigi Buffon and the ball struck the bar before bouncing down behind the line to put France ahead.

The linesman signalled a goal and Zidane celebrated the first and only time an opponent had scored against Italy in the tournament. Previously they had conceded just one own goal.

Zidane, who headed two goals in the 1998 showpiece match, became only the fourth player to score three times in World Cup finals after Brazilian duo Vava and Pele and England's Geoff Hurst, who got a hat-trick in the 1966 final.

Italy equalised 12 minutes later when Materazzi atoned for his earlier misdemeanour by rising magnificently above Patrick Vieira to head home an Andrea Pirlo corner from the right.

It was the first time both teams had scored in the final in 20 years and Italy went close again in the 36th minute when striker Luca Toni headed against the bar from Pirlo's cross.

France started the second half full of running with their lone striker Henry Thierry, who was a frustrated, unused substitute in the 1998 final against Brazil, looking dangerous.

Fabien Barthez was beaten again in the 62nd minute by a Toni header which was ruled out for offside but France remained the more adventurous amid the tiredness as the error count rose.

EXTRA TIME

They could not force a way through, though, and the final went into an extra 30 minutes for the fifth time.

Zidane could have finished the night as a two-goal hero, just as he was eight years ago, when he forced a spectacular save from Buffon after 105 minutes as he met Willy Sagnol's cross with a stunning header.

Instead, he ended the match in disgrace when, after an exchange of words with Materazzi, he felled the centre back with an angry butt.

The officials seemed to miss the incident but the Italian players remonstrated loudly and Argentine referee Horacio Elizondo ended Zidane's career nine minutes prematurely with a straight red card.

Italy had beaten Germany with two goals at the end of extra time in their semi-final but, despite their man advantage, they were out on their feet and unable to muster any further attacks.

"We can say that Zidane being sent off was the killing moment of the game," said France coach Raymond Domenech.

"Especially in extra time the Italian team were obviously waiting for the penalty shootout."

Having lost all three of their previous shootouts, including against France in the 1998 quarter-finals and Brazil in the 1994 final, Italy must have feared the worst.

This time though they were nerveless with five confidently struck kicks. France, however, were shorn of four probable first-choice penalty-takers through substitutions and the red card.

Six years ago Trezeguet scored a golden goal winner in the European Championship final that Italy had led until injury time but this time fate was against him.

Unlike Zidane's penalty in normal time, Trezeguet's struck the bar and bounced on the wrong side of the line.

Grosso, who was the late hero of Italy's second round win over Australia and the semi-final victory over Germany, applied the final touch to spark wild celebrations. Zidane did not reappear to collect his loser's medal.

More pictures to come on the PENALTY Kicks in the next post...watch this space......

for those with time continue reading ........ Dr S Hawking: How can the human race survive the next hundred years? In a world that is in chaos politically, socially & environmentally-Q &A to YAHOO

MORE Pics – MV LOGOS - FLOATING BOOKSHOP in PORT KLANG till END JULY;10 – 10 pm (Tue -Sat); 2 – 10 pm (Sun & Mon) - 6000 books on DISPLAY

Only one way up the the Floating Book shop ship


The Book Browers - young and old

After a lapse of almost 20 years the MV LOGOS SHIP is in Port. The novelty of boarding a ship to buy a book is attracting a steady stream of visitors to the Floating Book Shop berthed at Port Kelang. Being on board the vessel which was built in 1914 is part of the excitement.

The studious browers reading

The child, the kid and the grandfather browsers

On board the vessel, visitors can have access to more than 6000 books on a diverse range of topics.
The vessel will be in Port Kelang until end of the month and the next stop is in PASIR GUDANG for two weeks and then to KUANTAN Port for 10 days.

The adults at the rows and rows of book shelves on board

OPENING HOURS: 10.00 am to 10.00 pm from Tuesday to Saturday
2.00 pm to 10.00 pm on Sunday and Monday. Clear dierctions are given to go to the appropriate dock and you can get real bargains as the prices of some of the books are going for a song.




See the latest WORLD FOOTBALL CUP Final - 9 MORE Pictures

Sunday, July 09, 2006

Dr S Hawking: How can the human race survive the next hundred years? In a world that is in chaos politically, socially & environmentally-Q &A to YAHOO




Dr. Stephen Hawking
” I'm a theoretical physicist and the Lucasian Professor of mathematics at the University of Cambridge, and a fellow of Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge. I've continued my career there, despite enduring severe disability caused by motor neurone disease (specifically, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis). My 1988 book, A Brief History of Time, became a best-seller and brought my work in physics to a broader group so that all people could learn from it, rather than just academics.”

Dr Stephen posed this question to Yahoo Ans 4 days ago and CNN pick up the story (see below) and by Friday afternoon, no less than 17,000 answers were submittewd. At the time this post was uploaded no less than 20532 anwers were received. You can also give your answers.

And here is what I have responded below, you can see it here

We will survive; the human race can survive the next hundred years by being yourself; this automatically fulfills any responsibility. The gods created the Universe out of joy, playfulness and creativity, not because they thought they had to. Your being is blessed and spontaneous because it is. And fulfilling it with nature automatically fulfills your purposes and, in your terms, your responsibility.

You are awake who believe you dream. You are dreaming who believe you are awake; for the terms are meaningless. You make your tomorrow out of your desire & lust, as you form your present and your past. Your gut awareness is a god in you laughing, so rejoice and enjoy!

Now, there are no limitations or divisions to the self. You can indeed depend upon seemingly unconscious portions of yourself. The seemingly unconscious portions of your body draw energy from food and molecules, from the air to form your body.

All this happens because the inner portions of your being operate spontaneously, joyfully, freely; and all of this occurs because your inner self believes in you, often even while you do not believe in it.

The you that you consider yourself to be is never annihilated. Your consciousness is not snuffed out, nor is it swallowed, blissfully unaware of itself, in some nirvana. You are as much a part of a nirvana now as you ever will be. You are in the process of expanding your psychic structure, of becoming a conscious participant with the soul. You are becoming what your soul is.

You must learn to trust your own spontaneous nature. Your nervous system knows how to react. It reacts spontaneously when you allow it to. .In spontaneity there is a discipline that utterly escapes you, and an order beyond any that you know. Spontaneity knows its own order.

If you learn to trust your being, then you will be able to trust your institutions and your civilizations. You equate spontaneity with irresponsibility; abandon with evil. If you abandon yourselves to yourselves, then what good would seem to spring out of the heavens of your being?

Our civilization is in sad straits because we have denied spontaneity or fulfillment to individuals, and ALL our institutions are based upon that premise.

You think that, left alone, the natural inclinations of man would destroy civilization. Then what, indeed, started civilization, if not the natural inclinations of man? What began the cooperation that allows people to unite even in tribes, if not the natural inclinations of man?

Our world is in dire straits because we do not trust ourselves. Our social institutions are set up to fence in the individual, rather than to allow the natural development of the individual.



and here is the CNN report
Stephen Hawking has a question for you 'How can human race survive?' astrophysicist asks on Web site

Friday, July 7, 2006 Posted: 2327 GMT (0727 HKT)

NEW YORK (AP) -- Some questions even stump Stephen Hawking.

The famed British astrophysicist and best-selling author has turned to Yahoo Answers, a new feature in which anyone can pose a question for fellow Internet users to try to answer. By Friday afternoon, nearly 17,000 Yahoo Inc. users had responded to Hawking.

Hawking's question: "In a world that is in chaos politically, socially and environmentally, how can the human race sustain another 100 years?"

Some of the answers were short -- "get rid of nuclear weapons" -- and others vague -- "Somehow we will." Many were doubtful: "I don't think it is possible unless we expand into space."

A number of people suggested thinking differently, ending bickering or fostering cooperation.

Officials at Cambridge University, where Hawking is a mathematics professor, confirmed that Hawking wrote the message but said he would have no further comment.

Hawking's groundbreaking research on black holes and the origins of the universe has made him one of the best-known theoretical physicists of his generation. Author of the global best-seller "A Brief History of Time,"
Hawking is known for proposing that space and time have no beginning and no end.

Lately, he has been pondering the fate of humans.

In a speech June 13 in Hong Kong, Hawking said the survival of the human race depends on its ability to find new homes elsewhere in the universe because there's an increasing risk that a disaster will destroy Earth.

He said that if humans can avoid killing themselves in the next 100 years, they should have space settlements that can continue without support from Earth.

Hawking is one of 10 celebrity questioners Yahoo solicited as part of its "Ask The Planet" campaign.

The Internet company spent weeks trying to track Hawking down but got his participation within a day of reaching the correct assistant, said Patrick Crane, vice president of marketing for Yahoo Search.

The question was submitted a few days before the Hong Kong speech and posted Wednesday.

Over the next week, Yahoo employees are expected to work with Hawking to sift through the answers and select one or several to highlight as best responses.

Yahoo Answers, like an offering from Google Inc. and one planned by Microsoft Corp., is among the services aimed at tapping the collective intelligence. It's based on the premise that humans as a group can do a better job at finding information than machines or a single person can.

Anyone can ask or answer a question, regardless of expertise, though Yahoo will eventually implement a rating system meant to elevate users with better reputations, based on their past questions and answers.

Questions typically get 6 to 10 answers.

Past celebrity participants include Donald Trump, Isaiah Washington, Al Gore and "Click & Clack," the hosts of NPR's "Car Talk." U2 lead singer Bono closed the celebrity series Friday by asking, "What can we do to make poverty history?"


and here are some comments from a blogger at

Stephen Hawking Makes a Cameo

When I found out that Stephen Hawking was going to be asking the Answers community a question, I could hardly contain my excitement. Our weekly meetings sometimes derail into “wouldn’t it be cool if?” sessions, and Stephen Hawking is one name that consistently surfaces during these discussions.

Aside from being one of the world’s leading theoretical physicists, Stephen Hawking has also made some popular guest appearances on television – as a member of the Vice Presidential Action Rangers on Futurama, and as Lisa’s savior on The Simpsons. Now he’s joined the Answers community to ask, “How can the human race survive the next hundred years?

Already popular amongst Answerers, some ponder why he has yet to win a Nobel Prize, while others question his religious beliefs. I’m certain Professor Hawking will be pleased to see that his own ideas about black holes and the survival of the human race are being discussed on Answers.

Who knows, maybe Stephen Hawking will pen a new book based on his experiences in the Answers-verse entitled, “A Brief History of Yahoo! Answers.” In it, he could compare the range of Answers’ gravitational pull to that of a black hole.

Mario
*****************************
you can also give your answers here

and check the latest posting Jul 21 06
ANWAR IBRAHIM’S EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW–Final – PERILS SUPPORTING DR MAHATHIR; COLLABORATION - PAS, PKR & DAP; BETTER Muslim Non-Muslim UNDERSTANDING

Get complete protection against viruses, worms and Trojan horse programs – CA Anti-Virus 2008! Click here for cheap hotels
www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from Multidimid. Make your own badge here.
Blogroll Me!

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

Add to Google Add to Google
Google
 
Web powerpresent.blogspot.com